FYI, There are over 12 PR's with ntfs in the pr title.
The in-kernel ntfs implementation formerly published as part of the base
system is officially dead and has been removed from 10.0.
Time is due to remove all those pr's targeted at the in-kernel base
version of ntfs.
71774, 73484, 80088,
FYI, There are over 100 PR's with sysinstall in the pr title.
sysinstall is officially dead and will not be receiving any
fixs since bsdinstall replaced it. Time is due to remove all those
pr's targeted at sysinstall.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org maili
These ports already have been staged and are very simple script only
ports which are ready to be committed.
191660 qjail bug fix
191502 qchroot new port
190259 ppars updated
186269 can be closed
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing lis
Vitaly Magerya wrote:
On 2014-06-03 11:05, David Chisnall wrote:
We are pleased to announce that the FreeBSD project has begin the
transition from the GNATS bug-tracking system to Bugzilla. The
Bugzilla installation can be found here:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
It doesn't seem to be
Perry Hutchison wrote:
Some months ago, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
... if you need any help staging your ports I can provide reviews.
I have a couple of ports that need staging support added, and I've
finally managed to find time to look into it. Having read such
documentation as I could eas
The security/ppars port currently has this statement
RUN_DEPENDS= p5-Net-Netmask>=0:${PORTSDIR}/net-mgmt/p5-Net-Netmask
Here is the problem, if "pkg install p5-Net-Netmask" is done prier to
make install on the port, the port checks the hosts ports tree for
/net-mgmt/p5-Net-Netmask and recompil
Erich Dollansky wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, 04 May 2014 21:10:53 -0400
Fbsd8 wrote:
Erich Dollansky wrote:
I just installed chrome inside a jail. It does not display
anything. No matter what it is like settings or configuration or
any website. The same works as expected when chrome runs inside the
Erich Dollansky wrote:
Hi,
I just installed chrome inside a jail. It does not display anything. No
matter what it is like settings or configuration or any website. The
same works as expected when chrome runs inside the host system.
The chrome version is Version 33.0.1750.152 (256984).
When I r
It's only a script.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/181945
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
ill...@gmail.com wrote:
On 27 August 2013 20:13, Fbsd8 wrote:
I just did a portsnap run that updated the base port system.
Now I see a port's distfile going to /var/ports/distfiles instead of
/usr/ports/distfiles.
Is this a error in the newly updated base port system which contain
I just did a portsnap run that updated the base port system.
Now I see a port's distfile going to /var/ports/distfiles instead of
/usr/ports/distfiles.
Is this a error in the newly updated base port system which contains the
default port make environment?
_
I added this to my port Makefile for portname-3.2
CONFLICTS portname-1.* portname-2.* portname-3.[0-1]
Now I want to display a message block with instructions on how to handle
the conflicts. Is there a post-conflicts target or some other target
that gets processed around the conflicts process
Dirk Engling wrote:
Dear JoeB,
since you just threatened me via private email to expose my evil plans
of preventing your ubercool project from taking FreeBSD by storm, I
would like to comment on your views and your project publicly
On 22.03.13 23:12, Fbsd8 wrote:
On the subject of qjail
Chris Rees wrote:
On 20 July 2012 14:47, Fbsd8 wrote:
Script started on Fri Jul 20 09:25:23 2012
# /usr/ports/lang/php5 >make config
# /usr/ports/lang/php5 >make install clean
===> php5-5.4.4 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/apxs - found
===> php5-5.4.4 depends on file: /u
Script started on Fri Jul 20 09:25:23 2012
# /usr/ports/lang/php5 >make config
# /usr/ports/lang/php5 >make install clean
===> php5-5.4.4 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/apxs - found
===> php5-5.4.4 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/autoconf-2.69 - found
===> php5-5.4.4 depends on executable
What I want to know is this new pkg system going to remove the
requirement of having the complete ports tree on my system?
What I am looking for in an port system, is to install a port and any
files needed for the parent port and its dependents to automatically be
downloaded. So in the end my
Just downloaded phpmyadmin for 9.0 system.
The port files seem to be named wrong.
Makefile,v distinfo,v pkg-descr,v pkg-plist-chunk,v
make install command issues error message "Don't know how to make install."
I see on the web ports system that this port was just updated 5 days
ago. Looks l
I maintain a port that accesses the release distribution files. Now with
9.0 having a different path /i386/i386 and the files being compressed
first with tar and then again with xz I need to change the port to
access the new layout and file format.
I would like to leave the current version in
I have a lot of free time now that I am retired. I see a large number of
ports in open status that have been waiting to be committed longer than
30 days.
What is the procedure to become a ports committor?
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
htt
19 matches
Mail list logo
