Kubilay Kocak wrote:
> On 18/11/2015 9:48 PM, Fabian Keil wrote:
> > Roger Marquis wrote:
> >
> >> I need to get license info from a batch of ports and packages.
> >>
> >> Problem is not all the specified ports/pkgs are installed or have licens
Roger Marquis wrote:
> I need to get license info from a batch of ports and packages.
>
> Problem is not all the specified ports/pkgs are installed or have license
> info in their Makefile. Is there a reliable way to enumerate port or
> package license strings, preferably without fetching a pac
Jeffrey Bouquet via freebsd-ports wrote:
> This might be related to a thread (pcmanfm) today in the forums with
> similar issues.
>
> Suddenly after today's pkg update of gnome stuff, firefox and
> seamonkey permit browsing UNTIL one tries to save a page, it
> seems, then no further interaction
Scott Furry wrote:
> On 09/03/2015 08:46, Fabian Keil wrote:
> > Juergen Lock wrote:
> >
> >> I just saw vlc 2.2.0 is out and updated the port, please test:
> >>
> >>https://people.freebsd.org/~nox/tmp/vlc-2.2.0-001.patch
[...]
> > The only
Juergen Lock wrote:
> I just saw vlc 2.2.0 is out and updated the port, please test:
>
> https://people.freebsd.org/~nox/tmp/vlc-2.2.0-001.patch
Thanks for the update.
I get a couple of warnings at build time:
configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --disable-egl, --disable-libvnc,
"Christopher J. Ruwe" wrote:
> I am well aware that very probably I might be starting a rant thread,
> however, I am genuinely interested in opinions from the community.
>
> Since version 24, Emacs, the very good operating system missing only a
> decent editor, has developed a package manager fo
Fabian Keil wrote:
> Jan Beich wrote:
> > diff --git security/afl/Makefile security/afl/Makefile
> > index e197507..db31853 100644
> > --- security/afl/Makefile
> > +++ security/afl/Makefile
>
> Thanks a lot for the patch, I updated the shar file and will
Jan Beich wrote:
> Fabian Keil writes:
>
> >> [*] Testing the CC wrapper and instrumentation output...
> >> AFL_QUIET=1 AFL_INST_RATIO=100 AFL_PATH=. ./afl-clang -O2 -pipe
> >> -fstack-protector -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2
> >>
Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 20 Nov 2014, at 17:51, Jan Beich wrote:
> ...
> > while poudriere caught Clang i386 failing
> >
> > [*] Testing the CC wrapper and instrumentation output...
> > AFL_QUIET=1 AFL_INST_RATIO=100 AFL_PATH=. ./afl-clang -O2 -pipe
> > -fstack-protector -fno-strict-alias
Jan Beich wrote:
> Fabian Keil writes:
>
> > Vitaly Magerya wrote:
> >> I don't know what this part is supposed to do:
> >>
> >> # Workaround to make sure clang isn't confused for gcc
> >> CC=${COMPILER_TYPE}
> >>
&
Vitaly Magerya wrote:
> On 11/20/14 17:02, Fabian Keil wrote:
> > Does it work for you if you replace the line with:
> > MAKE_ARGS+= CC=${COMPILER_TYPE}
> > ?
>
> Yes, this fixes all the problems; AFL now installs fine.
Great, thanks for the feedback. I upd
Vitaly Magerya wrote:
> On 2014-11-20 14:43, Fabian Keil wrote:> Quoting the pkg-descr:
> > | American fuzzy lop is a fuzzer that employs a novel type of compile-time
> > | instrumentation and genetic algorithms to automatically discover clean,
> > | interesting tes
I'm looking for testers for a port of American fuzzy lop.
Quoting the pkg-descr:
| American fuzzy lop is a fuzzer that employs a novel type of compile-time
| instrumentation and genetic algorithms to automatically discover clean,
| interesting test cases that trigger new internal states in the tar
Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 12:16:01PM +0200, Fabian Keil wrote:
> > I'm looking for a way to let "pkg add" install packages that are
> > known to work but supposedly have the "wrong" architecture:
> >
> > root@privoxy
I'm looking for a way to let "pkg add" install packages that are
known to work but supposedly have the "wrong" architecture:
root@privoxy-jail / #pkg add /var/ports/packages/ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_7,1.txz
Installing ImageMagick-6.8.0.7_7,1...Installing libXrender-0.9.8_2...Installing
libX11-1.6.2_2,
FreeBSD Ports Management Team Secretary wrote:
> In years gone by, and I am thinking of FreeBSD 7.0 specifically, portmgr@
> gave some latitude to *ALL* committers to "just fix things" to get a port
> into shape. In the case of 7.0, it was making ports build for gcc4.
>
> What we have laying ah
Fabian Keil wrote:
> I'm occasionally missing packages after trying to rebuild them with
> portmaster.
> For example I just "lost" liferea:
And somewhat related:
##
fk@r500 ~ $portmaster /usr/ports/lang/python3
===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/lang/p
RW wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Oct 2013 12:44:52 +0200
> Fabian Keil wrote:
>
> > I'm occasionally missing packages after trying to rebuild them with
> > portmaster. For example I just "lost" liferea:
> >
> > fk@r500 ~ $portmaster liferea
> >
I'm occasionally missing packages after trying to rebuild them with portmaster.
For example I just "lost" liferea:
fk@r500 ~ $portmaster liferea
===>>> Currently installed version: liferea-1.8.15
===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/net/liferea
===>>> Gathering distinfo list for installed ports
==
Juergen Lock wrote:
> It's this time again, there's a new vlc version out and I want
> to update the port:
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~nox/tmp/vlc-2.0.7-001.patch
>
> Please give this a good testing and report any issues you find, thanx! :)
So far I haven't noticed any issues. Thank
Juergen Lock wrote:
> Port update:
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~nox/tmp/vlc-2.0.6-001.patch
>
> Please give this a good testing again...
Works for me so far. I mostly tested with DVDs.
Fabian
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Eitan Adler wrote:
> I have been trying to capture the differences between LEGAL and the ports
> tree.
> At this point I am convinced we need a new variable to capture in a
> machine usable way issues such as "special permission granted to
> distribute under the GPL" or "No license -- see
> http
Fabian Keil wrote:
> Thomas Kinsey wrote:
>
> > I've noticed that rule numbers do not display in pftop, and further that
> > this
> > (http://openbsd.7691.n7.nabble.com/pftop-Rule-number-shown-as-quot-0-quot-or-quot-quot-td122537.html)
> > seems to re
Thomas Kinsey wrote:
> I've noticed that rule numbers do not display in pftop, and further that this
> (http://openbsd.7691.n7.nabble.com/pftop-Rule-number-shown-as-quot-0-quot-or-quot-quot-td122537.html)
> seems to resolve the issue.
>
> Not being fluent in C, I'm not really sure what is goin
"Michael Zoon" wrote:
> >From: Jerry
> >Bash is currently at Bash-Release: 4.2, patch level 42. The port's
> >version is only at patch level 37, which was released on 16-Jul-2012.
> >This is an important port and since the freeze is over with, I was
> >wondering if this port will be updated?
Scot Hetzel wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> wrote:
> > Is somewhere written policy or portmgr recommendation about ports behavior
> > on install / deinstall?
My impression is that every maintainer has her own undocumented
policy although the approache
Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> I'm seeing shhguard-ipfw sig 10 on start on my machines updated to 9-STABLE
> (eg.
> FreeBSD 9.1-STABLE #5 r244924: Tue Jan 1 19:45:55 EET 2013
> :/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
> ) while on some -PRERELEASE it's running fine.
> Anyone seeing something similar?
"Herbert J. Skuhra" wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 13:18:35 +0100
> Fabian Keil wrote:
>
> > s...@tormail.org wrote:
> >
> > > I'm an i3 user on FreeBSD, and really love the WM. I think we need a new
> > > maintainer for the port(1) in F
s...@tormail.org wrote:
> I'm an i3 user on FreeBSD, and really love the WM. I think we need a new
> maintainer for the port(1) in FreeBSD, though, because current one doesn't
> ever update it and ignores my mails. 4.4 has been out a little while, but
> we only have 4.2. I'd like to follow the lat
Juergen Lock wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 11:54:15PM +0100, Pawel Pekala wrote:
> > Dnia 2012-12-19, o godz. 22:44:00
> > Juergen Lock napisa?(a):
> > > It's this time again, there's a new vlc release out and I want to
> > > update
> > >the port:
> > >
> > > http://people.freebsd.org/~nox
Juergen Lock wrote:
> As there were a few problems with vlc 2.0.3 I'd like people to test
> the 2.0.4 update before I commit it:
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~nox/tmp/vlc-2.0.4-001.patch
Thanks.
1. The OPUS option has no description.
2. Doesn't configure for me with NCURSES:
checking
Doug Barton wrote:
> I'm doing some updates and came across mail/postfix-policyd-spf which
> relies on mail/libspf2-10. The latter had a vuxml entry added on
> 2008-10-27. So my question is, why has mail/libspf2-10 been allowed to
> remain in the tree vulnerable for almost 3 years?
>
> Wouldn't
Michael Butler wrote:
> Seems that the change to the mount flags in recent -current has broken
> the compilation of sysutils/fusefs-kmod :-(
>
> It now needs something like the attached to compile,
The attachment didn't make it. Anyway, there's already a PR about it:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/
"Jeremy Messenger" wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 04:57:04 -0500, Fabian Keil
> wrote:
> > In related news, is anyone currently working on a webkit update?
> >
> > Neither uzbl nor the latest Liferea release are satisfied
> > with the versio
Andriy Gapon wrote:
> webkit-gtk2 fails to build after libtool-2.2.6a update.
> Auto tools provide some helpful self diagnostics:
> ===> Configuring for webkit-gtk2-1.0.1_8
In related news, is anyone currently working on a webkit update?
Neither uzbl nor the latest Liferea release are satisfie
Mark Linimon wrote:
> With 8.0 coming up, it's time to take a look at the ports that have
> been broken by some recent changes to freebsd-current. I have put
> a list of these ports, categorized by which change, on the wiki at
> http://wiki.freebsd.org/PortsBrokenOnCurrent.
>
> These changes ar
Shaun Amott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 06:46:27AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 07:13:04PM +0530, Ashish Shukla
> > ??? wrote:
> > > ...
> > > > So either encoding them so they do get properly decoded, or ensuring
> >
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ashish Shukla आशीष शुक्ल) wrote:
> I'm a maintainer of some of the FreeBSD ports. Whenever I post followup
> to any PR using Gnus or Mutt, the attachment gets messed up on web
> interface[1]. Any ideas with what MUA settings should I post followups ?
I think the web interface d
"Dan Langille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The following error persists:
>
> > ==>Entering directory /usr/home/dan/src/bacula-bat/work/bacula-
> > 2.2.4/src/qt-console
> > /usr/local/bin/qmake-qt4 -unix -o Makefile bat.pro
> > Cannot find file: bat.pro.
> > *** Error code 2
>
> To debug this, I
Florent Thoumie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As some of you may know already, X.org released X11R7.3 yesterday. Since
> we already made the move to modular ports for 7.2, the work to update
> ports to 7.3 was much faster.
>
> It's not likely to cause any major breakage but I'd like to get some
Simon Barner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I finally fixed the valgrind build with gcc 4.2. Could you
> please verify that
>
>a) the port also build on 7-current,
>b) that there are no regressions (I did a quick test on 6.2,
> and it seems to work).
I didn't notice any regressions o
David Southwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> merits /demerits of alternatives:
> Currently Running freebsd 6.1 and given the need to upgrade to 6.2.
>
> Is there any advantage in upgrading the system to 6.2 before upgrading
> Xorg or should I do it the other way round.
Upgrading to 6.2 first mak
"Andrew Pantyukhin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Reporting success on one of my desktops. It's a current/i386
> box with a little over 1000 packages (after the upgrade).
No major problems on RELENG_6/i386 with little over 700 packages.
At first xorg's radeon driver was really slow after the
upda
Vittorio De Martino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Il Sunday 22 April 2007 21:38:12 Thierry Thomas ha scritto:
> > Le Jeu 19 avr 07 à 1:00:38 +0200, Vittorio De Martino
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > écrivait :
> > > > I have just upgraded FreeMAT to 3.1, which fixes the inv() problem, and
> > >
[CC'ing ports@ again]
Gabor Kovesdan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fabian Keil escribió:
> > Gabor Kovesdan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Fabian Keil schrieb:
> >>
> >>> Gabor Kovesdan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
Gabor Kovesdan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fabian Keil schrieb:
> > Gabor Kovesdan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> What about grepping in the output of pkg_info? Or even better just
> >> grepping in ls ${PKG_DBDIR} to determine whic
Gabor Kovesdan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fabian Keil schrieb:
> > Also by now my goal has been slightly changed and I want
> > to give the user the choice to either use one of the Tor
> > ports, or on none (if Tor is running on a remote system or
> > in a
I maintain the ports security/dns-proxy-tor and
security/trans-proxy-tor which both require a Tor
control port being available somewhere to do their job.
They can work with both Tor versions in the ports collection
(security/tor and security/tor-devel), and I originally wanted
to register a depend
"Atz-Soft" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd be interested in the policy about new ports in the following situation:
>
> The program has the GNU General Public License as published by the Free
> Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your option)
> any later version.
> The pr
Scott Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Although privoxy 3.0.6 is supposed to have a package available, it
> is apparently not on the FTP server(s) at freebsd.org
I can't comment on the contents of the FTP servers, but if you
use FreeBSD 6.x, you can get a package at:
https://sourceforge.
"[LoN]Kamikaze" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've got two FreeBSD boxes, one where the latest enlightenment updates
> didn't make any problems and one where graphics/epsilon and
> x11-toolkits/ewl seek libraries in /usr/X11R6/lib instead
> of /usr/local/lib.
>
> Does anyone have an idea, what mig
Roman Bogorodskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fabian Keil wrote:
> > My system is FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE, and I have the feeling
> > that CONFLICTS aren't working at all, at least for the "conflicting"
> > ports I tried:
> >
> >
While trying to create a port for Privoxy 3.0.5 beta
I noticed that on my system CONFLICTS aren't working
as expecting.
The port is:
http://www.fabiankeil.de/sourcecode/freebsd/privoxy-devel-3.0.5.shar
Inside the Makefile I have the line:
"CONFLICTS= privoxy-[0-9]*"
which is supposed to confl
Adrian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After recently cvsuping my ports tree, enlightenment-devel failts to
> compile with:
>
> -f ".deps/e_entry_dialog.Tpo"; exit 1; fi
> if cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I../.. -I../../src/bin
> -I../../src/lib -DUSE_E_CONFIG_H -I/usr/X11R6/include
> -I/usr/
54 matches
Mail list logo
