Re: Ports management in 4.11

2007-03-29 Thread Charles Sprickman
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007, Garrett Cooper wrote: Charles Sprickman wrote: Hi all, I understand 4.11 is dead, but I've still got about 20 odd boxes to take care of for the next few months until we can figure out what breaks in 6.x for us. I saw that it's recommended to use the &quo

Ports management in 4.11

2007-03-20 Thread Charles Sprickman
Hi all, I understand 4.11 is dead, but I've still got about 20 odd boxes to take care of for the next few months until we can figure out what breaks in 6.x for us. I saw that it's recommended to use the "RELEASE_4_EOL" tag when updating the ports tree to make sure that we have a stable ports

Re: [nycbug-talk] creating "local" ports (fwd)

2006-11-03 Thread Charles Sprickman
Hello all, I'm finding that there are a number of ports that we need to patch for some functionality that's unique to our business (qmail, mailfront, etc.). Currently we just do "make patch" and then apply our patches. This works, but is a bit of a pain to maintain. Is there a way to create