On 2020-12-04 12:29, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Am I the only one who sees this (critical) problem after upgrade from
MariaDB 10.3.23 to newer version (10.3.25 or 10.3.27)?
There is our customized fine-tuned /usr/local/etc/my.cnf for years
untouched by pkg install or pkg upgrade. After the last
On 2018-11-12 19:13, Leander Schäfer wrote:
Hello,
databases/mariadb103-server doesn't want to build any more. I use
poudriere to build own local package repositories. It seems like one of
the two last updates broke databases/mariadb103-server port for me:
- 12 Nov 2018 16:58:52 or
- 10 Nov 2018
On 2018-10-17 0:26, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Hi po...@freebsd.org
cc br...@freebsd.org maintaine= of ports/security/openssl
On current, 12.0-ALPHA9, this kills pkg:
pkg install openssl
uname -r# 12.0-ALPHA9
cd /usr/src
cat .ctm_status # sr
Hi,
FreeBSD 12 has switched to OpenSSL 1.1 in 1200085
(https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/r339270) and there's
considerable fall-out in packages as a result.
The fall-out in packages should align nicely with the results of
building with security/openssl-devel or security/openssl111 (s
On 2018-08-19 0:25, Dewayne Geraghty wrote:
Bernard,
Given the silly way that the openssl crew have decided to name their
releases I think this is a good approach for the moment. I wonder how
they'll number an update to 1.1 :) (1.1A 1.2?) or what an update to
1.1.1 - a rod for their own back,
Hi All,
I've received a request to update the security/openssl-devel port to
1.1.1 (see https://bugs.freebsd.org/230679).
When 1.1.0 was added to the tree, I recall that I've had discussions
about the name of the port (openssl11, openssl-devel). Can't find the
thread, but we ended up with se
m/freebsd/freebsd-ports/blob/master/www/mod_log_sql
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 12:52 PM, Łukasz Wąsikowski
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> W dniu 2018-04-11 o 20:29, Bernard Spil pisze:
>>>
>>> > You are all maintainer of a port that depends on www/apa
et me and apache@ know if you can
update the port to use 2.4 or if there's a different port we should be
pointing to in MOVED.
Thank you for your cooperation!
With kind regards, Bernard Spil (with hat apache@)
2018-04-08 12:57 GMT+02:00 Bernard Spil :
> There's been no-one wanting
There's been no-one wanting to keep Apache 2.2 that has come forward.
Expect www/apache22 to be removed later in the week. Cleanup of
Mk/Uses/apache.mk after that.
2018-03-27 14:52 GMT+02:00 Bernard Spil :
> Hi all,
>
> Just noticed that the Apache project has removed the patche
Hi all,
Just noticed that the Apache project has removed the patches they had
for 2.2.34.
http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/patches/apply_to_2.2.34/
Combined with the security update of 2.4 branch to 2.4.33 leads me to
believe that Apache 2.2 is now vulnerable and no patches will be
prov
On 2018-03-21 17:53, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 04:55:59PM +0100, Bernard Spil wrote:
I'm open to suggestions on keeping both version 1.1.0 and 1.1.1 in the
tree,
Well, there is a -devel port to keep the development version of
OpenSSL,
no need to have more tha
Hi All,
I've been maintaining a port for OpenSSL 1.1.1 for myself for a while,
the port is at version 1.1.1.p3 as of today (see
https://github.com/Sp1l/ports/tree/master/security/openssl-master). It
works well with ${USESDIR}/apache.mk and DEFAULT_VERSIONS=
ssl=openssl-devel.
A while ago I
On 2017-03-03 18:35, Калоян Механджийски wrote:
Hello
I tried about 1 year ago Galera cluster with MySQL and it didn't work
out so back then I tried as I tried today MariaDB 101 with Galera
cluster.
I see that both Galera and MariaDB ports are being modified but the
combined configuration don't
On 2017-04-18 21:45, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Miroslav Lachman wrote on 2017/03/31 15:31:
I don't know if it was "pkg" fault or mariadb101-server and
mariadb101-client conflict.
I did standard "pkg upgrade" and at the end I have half files of
mariadb101-client missing:
# pkg check -Ba
Checking
On 2017-04-13 13:43, Rafael Henrique da Silva Faria wrote:
Hi everyone, I'm trying to compile Heimdal with LibreSSL on a server,
but there is a odd problem.
Actually, I'm updating a working server, updated the LibreSSL version,
and tried to recompile all dependent ports with "portmaster -fr
libr
On 2016-11-10 3:34, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Miroslav Lachman wrote on 2016/11/09 15:43:
Please update port to 10.1.19. It includes critical fixes
https://jira.mariadb.org/browse/MDEV-10977
https://jira.mariadb.org/browse/MDEV-10394
We are getting following error on some machines too.
ERROR] In
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2016-09-01 11:07, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 31 Aug 2016, at 19:03, Doug Barton wrote:
>>
>> August 31, 2016 12:37 AM, "Bernard Spil" wrote:
>>> On 2016-08-30 17:45, Doug Barton wrote:
>>>
>>>
On 2016-08-30 17:45, Doug Barton wrote:
Since the last commit to the mariadb10* ports the resulting binaries
dump core on 9.3-RELEASE-p43, even for a simple --help option. I am
assuming that is not the intended result
Doug
Hi Doug,
Nope, that is not intended. Assume this is the 10.0.27 u
ongs a lot more.
>>
>> +--On 22 août 2016 20:30:15 +0200 Bernard Spil wrote:
>> | Curious to know how we should procede with the upgrade of the OpenSSL
>> | port to 1.1.0!
>>
>> All ports need to work with it, I'm sure software like BIND9 do not build
>> with
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 5:01 PM, Bernard Spil wrote:
> 2016-08-27 11:18 GMT+02:00 Dirk Meyer :
>> Hallo Ollivier Robert,
>>
>>> [01:19:54] >> Failed ports: lang/go14:build security/libssh2:build
>>> devel/libevent2:build archivers/libarchive:bu
On 2016-08-24 22:08, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Bernard Spil writes:
Today new vulnerabilities with (3)DES and BlowFish were made public
You're referring to something different than the HTTPS/OpenVPN
attacks? Because it really wouldn't be accurate to describe those
as vulnerabilit
On 2016-08-23 14:42, Matt Smith wrote:
On Aug 22 20:39, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
ports-committers is a *NEVER POST DIRECTLY TO* list, so, moving it to
ports@ where this belongs a lot more.
+--On 22 août 2016 20:30:15 +0200 Bernard Spil
wrote:
| Curious to know how we should procede with the
On 2016-08-06 23:17, Mark Felder wrote:
On Sat, Aug 6, 2016, at 07:34, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
On 6/08/2016 7:23 AM, Michael Grimm wrote:
> Hi —
>
> Kubilay Kocak wrote:
>
>> Unfortunately you are yet one more example of a user that's been left in
>> the lurch without information or recourse wonde
On 2016-07-24 14:25, Jim Ohlstein wrote:
Hello,
On 07/24/16 05:42, Mark J. Carpio wrote:
Hello all,
I am seeing an issue when attempting to update mariadb10.1
uname:
FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE-p4 #0: Sat May 28 12:23:44 UTC 2016
r...@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2016-06-28 16:58, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> +--On 28 juin 2016 10:30:10 -0400 Dan Langille wrote:
> |> On Jun 28, 2016, at 7:56 AM, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> |>
> |>
> |>
> |> +--On 27 juin 2016 17:22:56 -0400 Dan Langille wrote:
> |> | I've been wor
On 2015-12-03 16:28, Ruud Boon wrote:
Awesome!!
Thnx again!
On 03 Dec 2015, at 16:11, Bernard Spil wrote:
On 2015-12-03 14:22, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
On 4/12/2015 12:02 AM, Ruud Boon wrote:
Hi,
Thnx for maintaining the letsencrypt port!
I’m wondering if you have any plans to upgrade to the
On 2015-12-03 14:22, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
On 4/12/2015 12:02 AM, Ruud Boon wrote:
Hi,
Thnx for maintaining the letsencrypt port!
I’m wondering if you have any plans to upgrade to the just release
v0.1.0?
Cheers,
Ruud
You're welcome :)
Bernard (cc'd) just landed the 20151123 update 2 days
On 2015-12-03 14:22, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
On 4/12/2015 12:02 AM, Ruud Boon wrote:
Hi,
Thnx for maintaining the letsencrypt port!
I’m wondering if you have any plans to upgrade to the just release
v0.1.0?
Cheers,
Ruud
You're welcome :)
Bernard (cc'd) just landed the 20151123 update 2 days
28 matches
Mail list logo
