On 01/10/13 20:48, Warren Block wrote:
> Most recent version:
Please feel free to commit your patch.
Thanks,
Beat
> Index: ports/UPDATING
> ===
> --- ports/UPDATING(revision 310189)
> +++ ports/UPDATING(working copy)
> @@ -5
On 01/07/13 15:22, Mikhail T. wrote:
> On 07.01.2013 03:33, freebsd-ports-requ...@freebsd.org wrote:
>> portname: accessibility/kdeaccessibility description:
>> Accessibility applications for KDE maintainer:po...@freebsd.org
>> deprecated because: Depends on QT3; unmaintained expiration
On 09/07/12 13:18, Ivan Voras wrote:
> On 07/09/2012 14:36, Beat Gaetzi wrote:
>
>> For those reasons by February 28th 2013 the FreeBSD ports tree will
>> no longer be exported to CVS. Therefore ports tree updates via CVS
>> or CVSup will no longer available after that
The development of FreeBSD ports is done in Subversion nowadays.
For the sake of compatibility a Subversion to CVS exporter is
in place which has some limitations. For CVSup mirroring cvsup
based on Ezm3 is used which breaks regularly especially on amd64
and with Clang and becomes more and more unm
Hi,
Today, 18 years ago the first version of Mk/bsd.port.mk was committed
to CVS. From the CVS log:
# cvs log -r1.1 Mk/bsd.port.mk
Working file: Mk/bsd.port.mk
head: 1.738
[...]
description:
revision 1.1
date: 1994/08/21 13:12:57; author: jkh; state: Exp;
Commit my
2012/7/23 Michael Scheidell :
> did I break something?
> svn commit had no pretty blank template anymore, like cvs commit did.
Make sure you have the FreeBSD specific options in the Subversion
port enabled:
ENHANCED_KEYWORD=on (default) "Enhanced svn:keyword support"
FREEBSD_TEMPLATE=on (default)
Hi Peter,
2012/7/18 Peter Jeremy :
> Thank you for your efforts in migrating the ports repository.
>
> On 2012-Jul-16 15:22:13 +0200, Beat Gaetzi wrote:
>>The ports tree switched to Subversion this weekend. CVS commit mails
>>will be turned off soon. If you like to receive t
2012/6/27 Alex Dupre :
> Beat Gaetzi ha scritto:
>> Yes, to get SeaMonkey 2.10.1 running we need to change parts of
>> bsd.gecko.mk which affects other ports and this needs more testing.
>
> Is such path available somewhere?
Yes, but testing is still ongoing so use it at y
2012/6/27 Marco Alberoni :
> Hello, are there any problems for the release of the Seamonkey 2.10.1 port?
Yes, to get SeaMonkey 2.10.1 running we need to change parts of
bsd.gecko.mk which affects other ports and this needs more testing.
Beat
___
freebsd
2012/6/20 Boris Samorodov :
> Hi All,
>
> Andrew, thanks for your time and help!
>
> 19.06.2012 21:14, Andrew W. Nosenko написал:
>
>> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 6:16 PM, Boris Samorodov wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi List,
>>>
>>> I use clang compiled world (WITH_CLANG_IS_CC="YES" and
>>> WITH_LIBCPLUSPLUS="YES"
2012/2/21 Boris Samorodov :
> On 21.02.2012 16:59, Olivier Smedts wrote:
>
>> Some help from the gecko team ? :)
>
>
> It was not a success for me:
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome/2012-February/026907.html
Well gecko@ is not the same as gnome@ ;)
Its's one of my open tasks but
On 05.03.2011 12:48, Heino Tiedemann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is there someone who likes to go for the Firefox 4 in ports?
>
> maybe into www/firefox-devel?
>
>
> Firefox 4 is in the State "beta 12" - what means it is the release
> candidate.
Firefox 4 is available for FreeBSD for a long time in our
On 14.11.2010 22:00, Kris Moore wrote:
> On Sun 14/11/10 3:44 PM , Anonymous wrote:
>> Kris Moore writes:
>>> On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 12:24:44PM -0700, Warren Block wrote:
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 14/11/2010 18:18 Warren Block said the following:
>> On Sat,
On 26.10.2010 15:45, Alexey Shuvaev wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 10:02:10AM +0200, Beat Gaetzi wrote:
>> On 25.10.2010 23:03, Ilya A. Arhipov wrote:
>>> Crash using OSS when trying to rewind html5 video.
>>>
>>> You can look here: https://bugzilla.mozilla.o
On 25.10.2010 23:03, Ilya A. Arhipov wrote:
> Crash using OSS when trying to rewind html5 video.
>
> You can look here: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=605861
> Also i create pr: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=151728
Committed. Thanks!
Beat
__
On 08/10/10 14:38, Jimmie James wrote:
> On 08/10/10 08:30, Beat Gaetzi wrote:
>>> On 08/05/10 03:27, Beat Gaetzi wrote:
>>>> On 05.08.2010 05:53, Jimmie James wrote:
>>>>> On 03.08.2010 18:59, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
>>>>>> On 8/3/10 3:05
> On 08/05/10 03:27, Beat Gaetzi wrote:
>> On 05.08.2010 05:53, Jimmie James wrote:
>>> On 03.08.2010 18:59, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
>>>> On 8/3/10 3:05 AM, Beat Gaetzi wrote:
>>>>> On 03.08.2010 02:59, Doug Barton wrote:
>>>>>>>
On 05.08.2010 05:53, Jimmie James wrote:
> On 03.08.2010 18:59, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
>> On 8/3/10 3:05 AM, Beat Gaetzi wrote:
>>> On 03.08.2010 02:59, Doug Barton wrote:
>>>>> Just curious about the status of native Thunderbird 3.1.x. IMO the
>>&
On 03.08.2010 20:52, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 08/03/10 09:59, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
>> On 8/3/10 3:05 AM, Beat Gaetzi wrote:
>>> On 03.08.2010 02:59, Doug Barton wrote:
>>>> Just curious about the status of native Thunderbird 3.1.x. IMO the
>>>> linux
On 03.08.2010 20:52, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 08/03/10 09:59, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
>> On 8/3/10 3:05 AM, Beat Gaetzi wrote:
>>> On 03.08.2010 02:59, Doug Barton wrote:
>>>> Just curious about the status of native Thunderbird 3.1.x. IMO the
>>>> linux
On 03.08.2010 18:59, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> On 8/3/10 3:05 AM, Beat Gaetzi wrote:
>> On 03.08.2010 02:59, Doug Barton wrote:
>>> Just curious about the status of native Thunderbird 3.1.x. IMO the linux
>>> version is a significant improvement over 3.0.x, so I&#
On 03.08.2010 02:59, Doug Barton wrote:
> Just curious about the status of native Thunderbird 3.1.x. IMO the linux
> version is a significant improvement over 3.0.x, so I'd like to run the
> native version and get out of "clunky font land" sometime soon. :) Do
> y'all have a roadmap? If I missed i
On 22.06.2010 09:23, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 06/21/10 23:25, b. f. wrote:
>> Doug Barton wrote:
>>> On to the next victim. :) In my ongoing campaign to build my ports with
>>> gcc 4.5.1 thunderbird was the next to fall. Full log is at
>>> http://people.freebsd.org/~dougb/tbird.txt
>>
>> Before you
Hi,
On 04/23/10 07:32, David Probst wrote:
> I was wondering if you could tell me if the FreeBSD 8.0 port for
> lightning 1.0+ to run with Thunderbird 3 is going to be available in the
> near future.
You could use the lightning port from our development repository:
# svn co
https://trillian.chru
Hi,
> Hello,all!
> I'm trying to install firefox 3.6 from /usr/ports/www/firefox.
> First, I pkg_delete'd previousely installed firefox 3.0,
> but when doing make install clean I see the following errors:
> ../../dist/system_wrappers/pango/pango.h:3:30: error: pango/pango.h:
> No such file or dire
Hi,
Boris Samorodov wrote:
> Hello Ed,
>
> thanks for your hard work!
>
> On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 20:42:54 +0100 Ed Schouten wrote:
>
>> I've noticed there is some breakage in ports, but it shouldn't be too
>> serious.
>
> Seems that emulators/virtualbox-ose is broken:
Yes, there is a pr open wit
David Southwell wrote:
>> Beat Gaetzi wrote:
>>> Philipp Wuensche wrote:
>>>> Martin Wilke wrote:
>>>>> Please report any functionality which was working with previous
>>>>> versions of VirtualBox and no longer working with 3.1.2 or any b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
First of all thanks a lot for all the valuable feedback. We have updated
the ports to fix the reported problems:
- - virtualbox-ose-additions:
- Update to a more recent svn snapshot. The kernel module from 3.1.2
was not loadable.
- Adjust pkg-
Philipp Wuensche wrote:
> Martin Wilke wrote:
>> Please report any functionality which was working with previous versions of
>> VirtualBox and no longer working with 3.1.2 or any build failure.
>
> Seem like the fix from
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/emulators/virtualbox/files/patc
Beat Gaetzi wrote:
> Rainer Hurling wrote:
>> On 24.12.2009 09:46 (UTC+1), Scott Bennett wrote:
>>> On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:46:06 + Anton Shterenlikht
>>> wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 12:36:12PM +0100, Rainer Hurling wrote:
>>>&g
Rainer Hurling wrote:
> On 24.12.2009 09:46 (UTC+1), Scott Bennett wrote:
>> On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:46:06 + Anton Shterenlikht
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 12:36:12PM +0100, Rainer Hurling wrote:
On 22.12.2009 10:38 (UTC+1), Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 21,
Scott Bennett wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:46:06 + Anton Shterenlikht
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 12:36:12PM +0100, Rainer Hurling wrote:
>>> On 22.12.2009 10:38 (UTC+1), Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 09:47:33PM +0100, Rainer Hurling wrote:
> Accord
Hi,
Maxim wrote:
> I have problems with make install VirtualBox from ports on FreeBSD
> 7.2-RELEASE amd64.
> Ports are cvsupped.
> Install options selected: QT4, DBUS. All other options unchecked.
> I have reviewed make log for errors but didn't find any.
Could you please try building with X11 su
33 matches
Mail list logo
