On 05/03/2012 04:48, Super Bisquit wrote:
New error is: /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libicui18n.so.46" not
found, required by "libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0".
I have libicu18n.so.48.
I'm running portupgrade -a -f on my machine.
That's a fault found in many ports. Hidden dependencies.
Many ports au
/bttransfer.cpp:24:
/usr/local/include/torrent/download.h:43:31: error: sigc++/connection.h:
No such file or directory
/usr/local/include/torrent/download.h:44:34: error:
sigc++/functors/slot.h: No such file or directory
Thanks for any workaround...
Angelo Turetta
What I understand from this page:
https://www.isc.org/software/dhcp/versions
is that the only version of isc-dhcp-server currently available from
ports is EOL and soon-to-be deprecated (dhcp31 and dhcp40 are marked
BROKEN).
Is there any work going on, just not to reinvent the wheel?
Angelo
There seem to be a variable expansion problem: %APPNAMELC is not
supposed to be part of a filename, I suppose.
This happens on 7-STABLE AMD64 about two months old.
Any glue?
Angelo.
Scanning dependencies of target kate-plugins-handbook
[ 29%] Generating index.cache.bz2
kio_help4(18866) KLoca
a binary package for open-vm-tools
and open-vm-tools-nox11 in the 7.1 release.
Thanks,
Angelo Turetta
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
I seem to remember some work on building ports/packages in a chroot
using DESTDIR.
I found a lot of infrastructure in bsd.destdir.mk, does anybody know
what status all that stuff is at?
Any docs/errata/TODO worth reading before experimenting with it?
Thanks a lot,
Angelo Turetta
Does anyone know why http://www.nagios.org/ lists version 3.0.3 as
'latest stable', while in FreeBSD ports 3.0.3 is listed as nagios-devel?
May I suggest something like:
net-mgmt/nagios -> net-mgmt/nagios2 (repocopy)
net-mgmt/nagios-devel -> net-mgmt/nagios (update)
Or is ther
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Hi All,
If nobody objects I'll submit this about 24 hours from now since I've
already posted and Vivek previously agreed.
Once www/rt38 is in, I'd like to do the same for www/rt34
which would give us 2 rt ports around ~2009 down from 6.
Looking at the patch you po
hat could I use
for binary upgrades on the production servers?
Thanks,
Angelo Turetta
Modena - Italy
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Every new version has such *evident* regressions!
Beside needlessly repackaging ports that fail build when doing "-a -p"
(obviously non repeatable by the developers), and sometimes failing to
reinstall a package if the install phase fails (also non reproducible,
but happening nonetheless in pr
Thomas Zander wrote:
There it is:
http://www.rrr.de/~riggs/mplayer/m20071021.tar.bz2
May I ask you: if the software is at 1.0.rc2, why the port version is
set at 0.99.xx?
You might want to make some test on your own, but in my experience using
a version like 1.0.r2 is supported by the port s
I only tested on RELENG_6/AMD64.
Let me know how it works for you
Angelo Turetta.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
havior? Maybe it's
happening because the implicit update takes precedence over the '-o' switch?
Angelo Turetta
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Peter Jeremy wrote:
One system had a couple
of problems with portupgrade apparently forgetting to re-install
packages after uninstalling them - which took a bit of cleaning up -
and losing pieces of packages ('pkg_info -g' reported files missing).
This is an annoying known issue
http:
phase.
I don't think this is the intended behaviour.
Angelo Turetta
Modena - Italy
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 10:32:40 -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 10:48:52AM +0200,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: undefined reference to `lua_createtable'
LuaExtension.o(.text+0x34d): In function
`cf_scite_constname(lua_State*)':
[...]
The question is why
The recent upgrade of p5-FreeBSD-Portindex improves processing of master
/slave ports, but highlighted a dozen ports with a wrong MASTERDIR
syntax (eg. it ends with a slash)
Someone cares to fix? I attach a cumulative patch.
Thanks,
Angelo Turetta
Index: japanese/kinput2-canna/Makefile
17 matches
Mail list logo