___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Michael Butler via freebsd-ports writes:
> The removal of the packed_simd patch might be premature.
>
> I now cannot build either firefox or thunderbird. Both fail with
> something like ..
>
> error: aborting due to previous error
>
> For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0
INDEX build failed with errors:
Generating INDEX-11 - please wait..--- describe.accessibility ---
--- describe.arabic ---
--- describe.archivers ---
--- describe.astro ---
--- describe.audio ---
--- describe.benchmarks ---
--- describe.biology ---
--- describe.cad ---
--- describe.chinese ---
--- d
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you
## Michael Butler via freebsd-ports (freebsd-ports@freebsd.org):
> The removal of the packed_simd patch might be premature.
>
> I now cannot build either firefox or thunderbird. Both fail with
> something like ..
Cannot confirm, I got e.g.
Makefile ident: $FreeBSD: head/www/firefox/Makefil
The removal of the packed_simd patch might be premature.
I now cannot build either firefox or thunderbird. Both fail with
something like ..
error: aborting due to previous error
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0432`.
error: could not compile `packed_simd`
I've updated old samba410 to samba413-4.13.1_1 on my 12-STABLE (r367937)
system. Package has been built by local poudriere, jail is equivalent to host
(installed from same src+obj).
Package has been built with minimal options to support standalone sever: no
AD/DC, no Kerberos, no DNS updat
Hi Yuri,
Am 24.11.20 um 10:06 schrieb Yuri Pankov:
Rainer Hurling wrote:
Yesterday I committed net/hblock [r556099] after changing the patch to
PLIST_FILES (instead of pkg-plist with only two files) against the
suggestion of the submitter. The line in question is:
PLIST_FILES=bin/${PORTNAME}
Rainer Hurling wrote:
Yesterday I committed net/hblock [r556099] after changing the patch to
PLIST_FILES (instead of pkg-plist with only two files) against the
suggestion of the submitter.The line in question is:
PLIST_FILES=bin/${PORTNAME} %%MANPAGES%%man/man1/hblock.1.gz
I made this change
Yesterday I committed net/hblock [r556099] after changing the patch to
PLIST_FILES (instead of pkg-plist with only two files) against the
suggestion of the submitter.The line in question is:
PLIST_FILES=bin/${PORTNAME} %%MANPAGES%%man/man1/hblock.1.gz
I made this change because it allows the
10 matches
Mail list logo
