Success at last on Pi3 aarch64, was Re: Firefox build failure

2020-09-01 Thread bob prohaska
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 08:35:59AM -0700, bob prohaska wrote: > > In the meantime a clean restart is going, it looks like firefox > got bumped to version 80. Perhaps that'll make a difference. To > conserve resources I'm using a plain vanilla make. If use of a > ports management system is mandator

Re: What is: py3kplist???

2020-09-01 Thread Raphael Kubo da Costa
On 9/1/20 8:13 PM, Willem Jan Withagen wrote: > Hi, > > In my ceph port one of the maintainers added this to > > USE_PYTHON= cython py3kplist > > But I'm trying to find out what it does? > And it is not (yet) on the USE_PYTHON page in the ports handbook. It's documented in Mk/Uses/python.mk

What is: py3kplist???

2020-09-01 Thread Willem Jan Withagen
Hi, In my ceph port one of the maintainers added this to USE_PYTHON= cython py3kplist But I'm trying to find out what it does? And it is not (yet) on the USE_PYTHON page in the ports handbook. --WjW ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http

Re: Updated ports not actioned - bugzilla being ignored

2020-09-01 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > net-p2p/gtk-gnutella https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247914 This one fails on i386 current. See the PR itself for details. -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372Now what ? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org

Re: pkg-fallout on one of the ports I maintain

2020-09-01 Thread Niclas Zeising
On 2020-09-01 11:46, Bob Eager wrote: Almost certainly the -fno-common problem with clang 11. This now defaults to -fno-common, which causes multiply defined symbols at link time if something is declared global in more than one module (instead of extern in all but one module). There is a similar

Re: How do port man pages get into https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?

2020-09-01 Thread Michael Gmelin
On Mon, 31 Aug 2020 20:33:34 +0200 Wolfram Schneider wrote: > On Wed, 26 Aug 2020 at 18:50, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > > > > Hi! > > > > > > man.cgi has provisions for most of this already, it's only > > > > missing some job to regulary extract the latest > > > > > > > > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub

Re: pkg-fallout on one of the ports I maintain

2020-09-01 Thread Bob Eager
Almost certainly the -fno-common problem with clang 11. This now defaults to -fno-common, which causes multiply defined symbols at link time if something is declared global in more than one module (instead of extern in all but one module). There is a similar problem with gcc. Declaring -fno-commo

pkg-fallout on one of the ports I maintain

2020-09-01 Thread Sean Greven
Hi there I have received a number of messages from pkg-fallout regarding the port I maintain, and pkg-fallout maintains that my port is broken. The really strange thing here is that I am able to build it in all the versions up till 13.0-CURRENT. The port builds without any errors. Any one with a

Re: Updated ports not actioned - bugzilla being ignored

2020-09-01 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > P.S. Apologies for using the word "ignored" - it's an emotive word, and > that wasn't the intent - I didn't mean it in a critical way. Well, the correct word would be 'drowned' 8-} Those PRs drowned in the flood of PRs -- and the committers drowned with them 8-} At least the rtc one is com

Re: Updated ports not actioned - bugzilla being ignored

2020-09-01 Thread Jamie Landeg-Jones
P.S. Apologies for using the word "ignored" - it's an emotive word, and that wasn't the intent - I didn't mean it in a critical way. Cheers, Jamie ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsu

Updated ports not actioned - bugzilla being ignored

2020-09-01 Thread Jamie Landeg-Jones
There are updates to 2 ports that are not being actioned - one of the ports has since been marked for deletion as it no longer works, and the fix is almost 2 years old! (I updated the fix a few months ago) How do I go about getting these actioned? emulators/rtc https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla