Re: Django versions

2019-03-06 Thread Charlie Li via freebsd-ports
On 07/03/2019 01:55, Craig Leres wrote: > I'm working on a port for mailman 3. I want to use django 2.1 because > that's what I'm using on the systems I'm currently running mailman 2 on > you can't really run different version of django on the same system). > But it turns out a lot of ports have RU

Re: Django versions

2019-03-06 Thread Antoine Brodin
On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 8:14 AM Craig Leres wrote: > > I'm working on a port for mailman 3. I want to use django 2.1 because > that's what I'm using on the systems I'm currently running mailman 2 on > you can't really run different version of django on the same system). > But it turns out a lot of

Django versions

2019-03-06 Thread Craig Leres
I'm working on a port for mailman 3. I want to use django 2.1 because that's what I'm using on the systems I'm currently running mailman 2 on you can't really run different version of django on the same system). But it turns out a lot of ports have RUN_DEPENDS for www/py-django111. One possibl

powerpc64 head -r344825: system-clang (8.0.0) asserts compiling mesa-dri-18.3.2_2's glsl/ir_clone.cpp: "Target supports vector op, but scalar requires expansion?"

2019-03-06 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
The below is from a ports-mgmt/poudriere-devel run under FreeBSD head -r344825 on an old PowerMac G5 (2 sockets, 2 cores each, powerpc64). The /usr/ports is from head -r494751 . buildworld buildkernel was via devel/powerpc64-xtoolchain-gcc materials and system-clang (8.0.0) was built (and installed

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

2019-03-06 Thread portscout
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you

powerpc64: devel/qt5-core build fails with: "Q_ATOMIC_INT64_IS_SUPPORTED must be defined on a 64-bit platform", more

2019-03-06 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
The below is from a ports-mgmt/poudriere-devel run under FreeBSD head -r344825 on an old PowerMac G5 (2 sockets, 2 cores each, powerpc64). The /usr/ports is from head -r494751 . buildworld buildkernel was via devel/powerpc64-xtoolchain-gcc materials and system-clang (8.0.0) was built (and installed

Re: [HEADS UP] Clang 8.0.0 upgrade on 13.0-CURRENT

2019-03-06 Thread Jan Beich
Robert Huff writes: > Charlie Li writes: > >> The LLVM ports are still needed for those consumers that need their >> components, such as llvm-config and the like. Please refer to the aptly >> named wiki page again: >> https://wiki.freebsd.org/WhyDoIHaveToBuildLLVMWhenIAlreadyHaveClangInstall