Hi,
On Sun, 11 Mar 2018 18:46:09 +0100
Guido Falsi wrote:
> On 03/11/18 07:54, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > it took a bit longer before I could test this on the very same
> > machine where I found the problem. I updated first FreeBSD and then
> > the ports. Yes, the problem is gone. I
On 03/12/18 14:06, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
Yes, but the boundary can not be drawn at the 'source' border.
My fear is that we do not really understand where the border lies.
In general this is true. However, in case of Go or C++ the boundary is
clear. -)
Yuri
___
Hi!
> On 03/12/18 13:42, Adam Weinberger wrote:
> > While source is preferred over binary, we don???t delete ports just
> > because they have binary blobs.
> Binary downloads have an entirely different trust model. You have to
> trust the producer of the binary, vs. with source code it is much
On 03/12/18 13:42, Adam Weinberger wrote:
While source is preferred over binary, we don’t delete ports just
because they have binary blobs.
Binary downloads have an entirely different trust model. You have to
trust the producer of the binary, vs. with source code it is much more
obvious wha
On 12 Mar, 2018, at 11:30, Yuri wrote:
There should be no reason to download prebuilt executables for open
source software. Binaries present security risk.
It violates chapter 5.4 of PHB which mentions that MASTER_SITES/DISTNAME
refers to "source archive", and for sysutils/ipfs-go it isn't
Also https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218179
On 18-03-12 10:30:53, Yuri Victorovich wrote:
> There should be no reason to download prebuilt executables for open
> source software. Binaries present security risk.
>
> It violates chapter 5.4 of PHB which mentions that MASTER_SITES
There should be no reason to download prebuilt executables for open
source software. Binaries present security risk.
It violates chapter 5.4 of PHB which mentions that MASTER_SITES/DISTNAME
refers to "source archive", and for sysutils/ipfs-go it isn't a source
archive.
This port should be e
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 8:38 AM, Marko Cupać wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am quite new to ports, and am trying to update port net-mgmt/phpipam
> from 1.2.1 to 1.3.1. I changed PORTVERSION in Makefile, ran `make
> makesum' but poudriere testport fails (below). Any advices how to fix
> this?
>
> Thank you in
Hi,
I am quite new to ports, and am trying to update port net-mgmt/phpipam
from 1.2.1 to 1.3.1. I changed PORTVERSION in Makefile, ran `make
makesum' but poudriere testport fails (below). Any advices how to fix
this?
Thank you in advance,
===> Generating temporary packing list
cd /wrkdirs/usr/
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you
10 matches
Mail list logo