On Wed, 7 Feb 2018, Dave Horsfall wrote:
On Tue, 6 Feb 2018, Mark Felder wrote:
Would you like us to delete our port of it now? I can arrange for that if
you insist on not having proper ports of your software. At this point it
might be easier to just add a clause to your license that prohibit
On Tue, 6 Feb 2018, Mark Felder wrote:
Would you like us to delete our port of it now? I can arrange for that
if you insist on not having proper ports of your software. At this point
it might be easier to just add a clause to your license that prohibits
non-Linux platforms.
You're a lot poli
On Wed, Feb 7, 2018, 07:22 Mark Felder wrote:
> Ok I will start working on this.
>
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225717
>
> Thanks
>
> On Tue, Feb 6, 2018, at 17:07, Matt A. Tobin wrote:
> > Alright, if that is the case, then yeah you can just disable branding. If
> > you ru
On Tue, Feb 6, 2018, at 16:36, Matt A. Tobin wrote:
> Greentings,
>
> It would be awesome if you could build it closer to our official build
> configuration. Something more akin to
> http://developer.palemoon.org/Developer_Guide:Build_Instructions/Pale_Moon/Linux#head:Mozconfig_Files
>
> Patche
Ok I will start working on this.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225717
Thanks
On Tue, Feb 6, 2018, at 17:07, Matt A. Tobin wrote:
> Alright, if that is the case, then yeah you can just disable branding. If
> you run into troubles, i can help on this.. Or if you wanna come up w
On Tue, 6 Feb 2018 22:21:37 +
Mark Felder wrote:
> Dear Matt,
>
> After your recent harassment of OpenBSD
> (https://github.com/jasperla/openbsd-wip/issues/86) I decided to
> investigate our own packaging of Palemoon. As expected, we are also
> building against system libraries. You can revi
On 02/04/18 11:14, Russell L. Carter wrote:
Greetings,
Recently, within the last month, my poudriere builds have been failing
to build ports that interact with the host system's /etc/src.conf
settings of WITHOUT_GSSAPI=yes and WITHOUT_KERBEROS=yes. I've had all
but chromium working for several
Dear Matt,
After your recent harassment of OpenBSD
(https://github.com/jasperla/openbsd-wip/issues/86) I decided to investigate
our own packaging of Palemoon. As expected, we are also building against system
libraries. You can review our build log here:
http://beefy6.nyi.freebsd.org/data/103am
On 02/06/2018 15:02, Julian Elischer wrote:
> Hello ports people,
>
> When I was compiling the openjdb8 port I got the following errors. This
> is on -current from a couple of weeks ago with a ports tree from 459153
>
>
> Compiling ../generated/adfiles/ad_x86_64_format.cpp
> In file included fro
Hello ports people,
When I was compiling the openjdb8 port I got the following errors.
This is on -current from a couple of weeks ago with a ports tree from
459153
Compiling ../generated/adfiles/ad_x86_64_format.cpp
In file included from :391:
In file included from
/usr/ports/java/openjdk8/
When will the QT5 team go over to QT5.10 ?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
You never
Hi!
> Unfortunately, that's a little beyond my skillset and I'm also
> trying to use it with Icinga2 and the DB IDO backend or I'd try to
> give you a hand. It looks like the port is setup for Nagios or at
> least Livestatus with Icinga2?
I've prepared a patch, see
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugz
Unfortunately, that's a little beyond my skillset and I'm also trying to use it
with Icinga2 and the DB IDO backend or I'd try to give you a hand. It looks
like the port is setup for Nagios or at least Livestatus with Icinga2?
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Jaeger [mailto:li...@opsec.eu]
On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 05:03:05PM +, Brandon McCorkle wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I think urwfonts needs to be required as well for the module? I
> wasn't able to display the legend or labels till it was installed on
> the graphs in Icinga. I found a page out there mentioning it as a
> requ
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you
On Tue, 6 Feb 2018, Matthew Seaman wrote:
This is down to a deficiency in pkg(8) -- it can't handle having a
number of alternate packages or ranges of different package versions to
fulfil a dependency. The dependencies "baked into" each package are on
exactly the dependency package and version
On 06/02/2018 09:51, Ondra Knezour wrote:
> Hi gang,
>
> documentation is little sparse yet (found only mention in the Porters
> handbook, created PR for "end user" doc) and I am unsure, if we can
> handle this. Best way I can describe my question is probably via
> examples, so consider following:
Hi gang,
documentation is little sparse yet (found only mention in the Porters
handbook, created PR for "end user" doc) and I am unsure, if we can
handle this. Best way I can describe my question is probably via
examples, so consider following:
We have multiple PHP versions in ports (php56,
On 06/02/2018 04:09, Dan Mahoney (Gushi) wrote:
> In the meantime, I am actually curious about the questions I asked, as
> they're more than this issue -- if specifying a binary name in a ports
> Makefile will survive through to pkg. (The docs say nothing one way or
> the other), or how to get pkg
19 matches
Mail list logo
