uname: FreeBSD 11.0-RELESE-p9
arch: amd64
While trying to install the VirtualBox package, ran in to an issue libEGL.
Found out that libEGL and libGL have been moved to mesa-libs (only
documented in MOVED),
Did freebsd-update, and used portsnap to make sure system was up to date.
Did a pkg delete -
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 3:07 PM, Rastko P wrote:
> I used the portsnap fetch>extract>fetch>update
>
> then built portmaster,
>
> then used pkg version -l "<", which gave 2 out-of-date,
>
> then used portmaster -L, which gave 2 matching out-of-date,
>
> then used portmaster -a to update all ports,
On 14 June 2017 at 10:51, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> I think my main concern is getting packages into a synth-recognized
> repository.
>
> I would use NFS rather than http. I would need to be sure to disable
> freebsd.org server in the conf, think I just did, now need to check on the
> other com
> On 13 June 2017 at 18:01, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> > I just managed to install (first part) ports-mgmt/synth on FreeBSD
> > 11.1-PRERELEASE amd64, using portmaster after deleting all packages except
> > pkg and portmaster. Those old packages were no good anyway due to shared
> > libraaries b
I used the portsnap fetch>extract>fetch>update
then built portmaster,
then used pkg version -l "<", which gave 2 out-of-date,
then used portmaster -L, which gave 2 matching out-of-date,
then used portmaster -a to update all ports, which pulled in a lot of
dependencies, including llvm, cair
Hi,
this is a reminder that you do not have to be in portmgr@ or be a ports
committer to be able to work on /usr/ports/Mk/* . So if you have an
idea, fix, or other patch, feel free to send in a PR [1] or open a
review [2]. Some files in /usr/ports/Mk/ (like bsd.port.mk) do however
require portmgr@
Many ports newly report 'fstat' and refuse to run, and as many don't build
until I
get around to a buildworld cycle, the workaround is to run v11 pkg
pkg install -f ...
on this v12 system, then lock the new port from being re-from-package
or re-built
..
Otoh, some l
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 9:19 AM, Rastko P wrote:
> Nope, none of those, funny as it may sound, I was going by the
> "Handbook" and tried to use "portmaster", as it reported some
> upgradeable 'ports'.
>
> However, that was the first time I launched portmaster, and it was
> weird, because it kept
Nope, none of those, funny as it may sound, I was going by the
"Handbook" and tried to use "portmaster", as it reported some
upgradeable 'ports'.
However, that was the first time I launched portmaster, and it was
weird, because it kept prompting me to delete newer versions of software
than that w
Rastko P writes:
> I have a fresh 11-RELEASE dist. I am 'bootstrapping' the environment.
>
> I am in the process of building mail/thunderbird-52.1.1, because the
> binary doesn't have support for Lightning calendar extension.
>
> Yesterday, a documentation port build pulled in a lot of dependenci
13.06.2017 22:25, Rastko P пишет:
> I have some experience with FreeBSD. I don't mind building ports. You
> know sometimes it's necessary (most FreeBSD software is ported, and
> needs to be configured)
>
>
> But I cannot find in the documentation how to prevent a port
> re-compiling different ver
Hi Eugene,
I have a fresh 11-RELEASE dist. I am 'bootstrapping' the environment.
I am in the process of building mail/thunderbird-52.1.1, because the
binary doesn't have support for Lightning calendar extension.
Yesterday, a documentation port build pulled in a lot of dependencies,
including GCC
I have some experience with FreeBSD. I don't mind building ports. You
know sometimes it's necessary (most FreeBSD software is ported, and
needs to be configured)
But I cannot find in the documentation how to prevent a port
re-compiling different versions of GCC or other such monsters, when I
alre
On 13 Jun 2017, at 15:51, Rastko P wrote:
>
> I think my machine will die from severe dehydration if every other port
> keeps recompiling compilers.
>
> The last make for the "documentation translation" port took 6 hours or
> more. What's that in fan oil costs?
>
>
> How to prevent this?
Ins
P.S. John, the patch does fix it indeed, thanks!
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 7:51 AM, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> John, should I drop this into the port as a patch? Approved by: maintainer?
>
> -Max
>
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 4:10 PM, John Mehr wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> It looks like the latest version
John, should I drop this into the port as a patch? Approved by: maintainer?
-Max
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 4:10 PM, John Mehr wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It looks like the latest version of Subversion has become more strict with
> regards to CR+LFs and the attached patch should get things working for you
I think my machine will die from severe dehydration if every other port
keeps recompiling compilers.
The last make for the "documentation translation" port took 6 hours or
more. What's that in fan oil costs?
How to prevent this?
___
freebsd-ports@f
It is not the NEW PORT need /proc, it is the tool used to build the port
need /proc, which is bazel.And I know the /proc is not the way FreeBSD to
do it and I really do not like it.
Anyway ,I submitted a patch to bazel to use procstat_getpathname replace
the /proc method: https://github.com/bazelb
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 06:57:40PM +0800, Jov wrote:
> Hi ports hackers,
>
> I am porting tensorflow to FreeBSD, It uses bazel to manage the
> dependencies and do the build.The port work now is mostly done (see:
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219609,I have local patch
> to fix
Hi ports hackers,
I am porting tensorflow to FreeBSD, It uses bazel to manage the
dependencies and do the build.The port work now is mostly done (see:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219609,I have local patch
to fix the network need for do-configure) except one problem which I am
On 6/13/17 5:37 PM, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
> On 12-6-2017 17:09, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>> On 12 Jun 2017, at 13:29, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
>>>
>>> For one the Ceph port I'm doing I'm going to need python-pecan in het
>>> close future.
>>>
>>> Not sure how this works with python-modules sin
On 13 June 2017 at 18:01, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> I just managed to install (first part) ports-mgmt/synth on FreeBSD
> 11.1-PRERELEASE amd64, using portmaster after deleting all packages except
> pkg and portmaster. Those old packages were no good anyway due to shared
> libraaries being out of
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219863
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219864
Thanks,
Yuri
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send a
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 05:49:21 +0800, Martin Wilke wrote:
> Approved.
Merged (443488).
--
Vasil Dimov
gro.DSBeerF@dv
%
It is better to live rich than to die rich.
-- Samuel Johnson
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 12-6-2017 17:09, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 12 Jun 2017, at 13:29, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
>>
>> For one the Ceph port I'm doing I'm going to need python-pecan in het
>> close future.
>>
>> Not sure how this works with python-modules since it is something that
>> is only used by the ceph-por
25 matches
Mail list logo
