> On 4. May 2017, at 10:20 AM, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
>
> If you went as far as being able to create a pull request, you can do a
> git show HEAD or git diff origin/trunk...HEAD and submit that in the
> FreeBSD PR as well.
It's pretty easy to extract the diff from a PR on GitHub, just append
".d
Hello,
I noticed the apache unix group module was removed from ports:
[tburns@repo /usr/ports]$ pwd
/usr/ports
[tburns@repo /usr/ports]$ grep -n unixgroup MOVED
7099:www/mod_authz_unixgroup|www/mod_authz_unixgroup22|2014-10-26|Reflect
Apache version in portsdir
9298:www/mod_authz_unixgroup24||20
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you
On Thu, 04 May 2017 07:43:30 -0600
Jim Trigg wrote:
> ISTR that it's Thunar that depends on Samba by default.
Yes it looks like it came in when Thunar defaulted to depending on the
"Trash Panel Applet Plugin". Unfortunately the options framework
caches old defaults.
__
ISTR that it's Thunar that depends on Samba by default.
Jim
On May 4, 2017 7:18:46 AM MDT, RW via freebsd-ports
wrote:
>On Thu, 04 May 2017 08:09:47 -0400
>scratch65...@att.net wrote:
>>
>> I can't imagine what code could possibly be in thunar and samba
>> that the xfce desktop would need, pa
Le Thu, 4 May 2017 10:47:56 +0200,
Patrick Lamaiziere a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> I've upgraded my workstation (10.3-STABLE / amd64) via poudriere and
> ports svn://svn0.eu.freebsd.org/ports/branches/2017Q2 (rev 440002) and
> inkscape does not work anymore and fails with a segfault.
>
> $ inkscape
>
On Thu, 04 May 2017 08:09:47 -0400
scratch65...@att.net wrote:
>
> I can't imagine what code could possibly be in thunar and samba
> that the xfce desktop would need, particularly since the desktop
> is very simple, and also because I've never got samba
> functionality for free after installing xf
On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 08:09:47AM -0400, scratch65...@att.net wrote:
> On Wed, 3 May 2017 16:53:41 +0100, Matthew Seaman
> wrote:
>
> >>> Trying to install the desktop package, I discovered that it's
> >>> bundled with at least 2 unrelated pieces of software: Thunar,
> >>> and samba44. That bo
On Wed, 3 May 2017 16:53:41 +0100, Matthew Seaman
wrote:
>>> Trying to install the desktop package, I discovered that it's
>>> bundled with at least 2 unrelated pieces of software: Thunar,
>>> and samba44. That bothered me, but I needed the desktop.
>
>'Bundling' isn't the right term -- Thunar
Patrick Lamaiziere writes:
> I've upgraded my workstation (10.3-STABLE / amd64) via poudriere and
> ports svn://svn0.eu.freebsd.org/ports/branches/2017Q2 (rev 440002) and
> inkscape does not work anymore and fails with a segfault.
inkscape-0.92.0_1 from either /latest or /quarterly binary packag
Am 04.05.2017 um 10:47 schrieb Patrick Lamaiziere:
Hello,
I've upgraded my workstation (10.3-STABLE / amd64) via poudriere and
ports svn://svn0.eu.freebsd.org/ports/branches/2017Q2 (rev 440002) and
inkscape does not work anymore and fails with a segfault.
Works for me on recent 12.0-CURRENT am
Hello,
I've upgraded my workstation (10.3-STABLE / amd64) via poudriere and
ports svn://svn0.eu.freebsd.org/ports/branches/2017Q2 (rev 440002) and
inkscape does not work anymore and fails with a segfault.
$ inkscape
(inkscape:1234): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_convert: assertion 'str != NULL' failed
...
Hi!
> I maintain and couple of ports and I submit patches for others
> every so often. The process of preparing a patch file is slightly
> awkward as documented [1]
> If we want to use the github pull process is that now possible?
It's not possible, but if you provide a link to the pull process
Le 04/05/2017 à 09:58, Aristedes Maniatis a écrit :
> I maintain and couple of ports and I submit patches for others every so
> often. The process of preparing a patch file is slightly awkward as
> documented [1]
>
> If we want to use the github pull process is that now possible? There are 61
>
I maintain and couple of ports and I submit patches for others every so often.
The process of preparing a patch file is slightly awkward as documented [1]
If we want to use the github pull process is that now possible? There are 61
pull requests here: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-ports/pul
15 matches
Mail list logo