Hi!
> I got several "yes please" from members of the public,
> but no actionable response from members of the ports group
> So I am asking again.
I'd also like to have this patch.
If I look at the PR, mat is already working to integrate it.
--
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372
On 2017-01-03 19:55, Mark Linimon wrote:
The wiki doesn't have much of a "structure" right now. I did some
prototype
pages for a restructuring but it got bogged down due to internal
politics.
I wanna hear all about it and see what you got, merge with my ideas.
--
Vlad K.
__
On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 06:16:26PM +0100, Vlad K. wrote:
> However, what would be the best way to approach this via the FreeBSD wiki?
> I'm sure that random wiki pages in various users' namespaces is not quite
> the right thing to do. There currently are some ports Wiki pages but they're
> all over
jul...@freebsd.org (Julian Elischer) writes:
>Sometime ago I proposed the following change.
>I got several "yes please" from members of the public,
>but no actionable response from members of the ports group
>So I am asking again.
>> +# EXTRA_PATCH_TREE - where to find extra 'out-of-tree' patche
On 01/03/2017 08:33, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Vlad K. wrote on 2017/01/03 17:16:
I've submitted a patch for Postgres server ports with a note about
enabling checksumming
(https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214671). I'm now
preparing to submit a patch with a similar "Nice to know"
Adam Weinberger wrote on 2017/01/03 17:43:
pkg-message needs to contain only essential information,
But it is not true and never was. pkg-message always contains many other
informations.
Or are these really essential?
Message from postgresql94-client-9.4.10_1:
The PostgreSQL port has a coll
On 2017-01-03 17:43, Adam Weinberger wrote:
pkg-message needs to contain only essential information, otherwise
end-users will start to ignore them. I agree that tips should be
shared, but putting it into SVN isn't the way to go.
That's something along the lines of what I was thinking, but was
> On 3 Jan, 2017, at 9:16, Vlad K. wrote:
>
>
> I've submitted a patch for Postgres server ports with a note about enabling
> checksumming (https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214671). I'm
> now preparing to submit a patch with a similar "Nice to know" tip for
> Roundcube (chang
Vlad K. wrote on 2017/01/03 17:16:
I've submitted a patch for Postgres server ports with a note about
enabling checksumming
(https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214671). I'm now
preparing to submit a patch with a similar "Nice to know" tip for
Roundcube (changing default_host break
Hi.
As far as i understood, `pkg-message` is a place for every point you
want people installing it to know.
maybe if you are adding a daemon/service you can mention some points
on error-cases in it.
Best wishes, Mokhi.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org maili
I've submitted a patch for Postgres server ports with a note about
enabling checksumming
(https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214671). I'm now
preparing to submit a patch with a similar "Nice to know" tip for
Roundcube (changing default_host breaks the user profiles, and how to
On 3/01/2017 6:44 PM, Vlad K. wrote:
On 2017-01-03 11:31, Julian Elischer wrote:
Sometime ago I proposed the following change.
I got several "yes please" from members of the public,
but no actionable response from members of the ports group
So I am asking again.
I haven't checked the code in
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 3/01/2017 6:31 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
Sometime ago I proposed the following change.
I got several "yes please" from members of the public,
but no actionable response from members of the ports group
So I am asking again.
As a src committer I don't feel qualified to do the commit myself
a
On 2017-01-03 11:31, Julian Elischer wrote:
Sometime ago I proposed the following change.
I got several "yes please" from members of the public,
but no actionable response from members of the ports group
So I am asking again.
I haven't checked the code in detail for correctness, but conceptua
Sometime ago I proposed the following change.
I got several "yes please" from members of the public,
but no actionable response from members of the ports group
So I am asking again.
As a src committer I don't feel qualified to do the commit myself and
would like a guide/mentor for the task if I
16 matches
Mail list logo
