On Wed, 28 Sep 2016 02:40:54 +0200
"Carlos J. Puga Medina" wrote:
> Hi Bob,
>
> The new port is ready to go, but I need my mentor's approval or
> authorization to commit it into the ports tree. One of my mentors will
> take a look ASAP, so I hope you understand.
>
> Best regards,
Thanks. I tho
I forgot to mention that this problem has been reported:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212921
El 28 de septiembre de 2016 3:20:04 CEST, George Mitchell
escribió:
>On 09/27/16 20:56, Carlos J. Puga Medina wrote:
>> Hi George,
>>
>> Yes, I had the same problem like you. So yo
On 09/27/16 20:56, Carlos J. Puga Medina wrote:
> Hi George,
>
> Yes, I had the same problem like you. So you only need to define your
> default SSL version in /etc/make.conf
>
> See entry 20160616 in /usr/ports/UPDATING for further details.
>
> Regards,
>
Okay, /etc/make.conf now says:
WITH_P
Hi George,
Yes, I had the same problem like you. So you only need to define your
default SSL version in /etc/make.conf
See entry 20160616 in /usr/ports/UPDATING for further details.
Regards,
--
Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina
PGP fingerprint = C60E 9497 5302 793B CC2D BB89 A1F3 5D66 E6D0 5453
sig
Hi Bob,
The new port is ready to go, but I need my mentor's approval or
authorization to commit it into the ports tree. One of my mentors will
take a look ASAP, so I hope you understand.
Best regards,
--
Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina
PGP fingerprint = C60E 9497 5302 793B CC2D BB89 A1F3 5D66 E6D0 5
Before I file a PR, does this failure look familiar to anyone?
portmaster -BDg security/ca_root_nss
===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/security/ca_root_nss
===>>> Launching 'make checksum' for security/ca_root_nss in background
===>>> Gathering dependency list for security/ca_root_nss from ports
Hi
I don't want to be a nuisance, but...!
I submitted this new port just over two weeks ago. Someone made some
minor cosmetic changes to the Makefile, and I approved them.
Nothing has happened for nearly two weeks. I don't know if there are
special procedures for new ports, but as far as I can s
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 1:21 PM, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > Are there any PROs for the change?
>
> I've re-read the PR and your idea to allow both cua* and tty* being
> used. If that is possible and "does the right thing", it's even better.
>
> --
> p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372
No, I haven't. Thanks to point me.
I'm not sure what is 3.0.0.1 it looks like fork with unknown origins.
Original code was 2.0.0 before google code died and 2.0.0 is adopted in
lunux world, however not sure how they are going to build it now.
On 27.09.2016 23:23, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
Hi!
thi
Hi!
> this port looks very outdated and I have an issue with saving mp4 files
> in development branch of multimedia/zoneminder. Linux version of ZM
> linked against 2.0.0 version, so it's worth to try to update this port
> first and see if something improves. However, looks like sources are
>
Hi!
> Are there any PROs for the change?
I've re-read the PR and your idea to allow both cua* and tty* being
used. If that is possible and "does the right thing", it's even better.
--
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 4 years to go !
__
Hello,
this port looks very outdated and I have an issue with saving mp4 files
in development branch of multimedia/zoneminder. Linux version of ZM
linked against 2.0.0 version, so it's worth to try to update this port
first and see if something improves. However, looks like sources are
gone r
Kurt,
thank you for your really great answer.
27.09.2016 20:10, Kurt Jaeger пишет:
>
>> A user proposed some changes to deal with serial ports I do not quite
>> understand (and tend to not agree with). Can a serial ports guru take
>> a look at the PR:
>> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bu
Hi!
> > So the change from cua* to tty* is, while not really needed, not
> > really critical.
> >
> Folks might want to (also) consider the use case of a serial console --
> and being able to login to it (e.g., if all other access has failed, for
> an out-of-band communication mechanism with
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 07:10:33PM +0200, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> ...
> So, back to this usecase: Will a software someone is using to
> talk to logic analyzers, MSOs, oscilloscopes, multimeters, LCR
> meters, sound level meters, thermometers, hygrometers, anemometers,
> light meters, DAQs, dataloggers
Hi!
> A user proposed some changes to deal with serial ports I do not quite
> understand (and tend to not agree with). Can a serial ports guru take
> a look at the PR:
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211101
> and comment here (or at the PR if you wish) on proposed changes (for
Hi!
> I am building a port of librevault and I require baminimum version
> of 1.58.0 for boost and 3.0.0 of protobuf. I am wondering what would
> be done to make this possible?
For boost: There's a long-running PR for this, because it's really
not simple to upgrade:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugz
I am building a port of librevault and I require baminimum version of 1.58.0
for boost and 3.0.0 of protobuf. I am wondering what would be done to make this
possible?
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/
> On 27 Sep 2016, at 5:05 PM, Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> wrote:
>
> Margaret wrote on 09/27/2016 14:55:
>
> [...]
>
>>> Did you stop pkg in the middle or did you let it go? I think it will
>>> show you conflict message and ask you if you would like to deinstall PHP
>>> 7.0 and install
Margaret wrote on 09/27/2016 14:55:
[...]
Did you stop pkg in the middle or did you let it go? I think it will
show you conflict message and ask you if you would like to deinstall PHP
7.0 and install 5.6 instead.
Miroslav Lachman
I stopped it immediately.
If you're right about it showing a
Hi!
> Both 5.* and 7.* are current tracks at PHP, so it's not
> surprising that a package is built with 5.6. What surprised me,
> apart from pkg's apparent willingness to ignore an existing
> install of 7.0, was that there are no pkgs built against 7.0,
> even though 7.0 provides a jump in perfor
On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 13:02:46 +0200, Mathieu Arnold
wrote:
>Le 26/09/2016 à 21:42, scratch65...@att.net a écrit :
>> I have the PHP 7.0 package installed under 10.2. Wanting to
>> install the pecl-imagick port, I called pkg search, which
>> returned a ref. I only caught the fact that it was goin
[Default] On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 13:40:33 +0200, Miroslav Lachman
<000.f...@quip.cz> wrote:
>scratch65...@att.net wrote on 09/26/2016 21:42:
>> I have the PHP 7.0 package installed under 10.2. Wanting to
>> install the pecl-imagick port, I called pkg search, which
>> returned a ref. I only caught t
Hello,
I'm not a serial guru, but I have used serial extensively over the
past 20 - 40 years.
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> Hi All!
>
>
> A user proposed some changes to deal with serial ports I do not quite
> understand (and tend to not agree with). Can a serial port
scratch65...@att.net wrote on 09/26/2016 21:42:
I have the PHP 7.0 package installed under 10.2. Wanting to
install the pecl-imagick port, I called pkg search, which
returned a ref. I only caught the fact that it was going to
install PHP 5.6 despite my having 7.0 installed when it started
down
Le 26/09/2016 à 21:42, scratch65...@att.net a écrit :
> I have the PHP 7.0 package installed under 10.2. Wanting to
> install the pecl-imagick port, I called pkg search, which
> returned a ref. I only caught the fact that it was going to
> install PHP 5.6 despite my having 7.0 installed when it
Hi All!
A user proposed some changes to deal with serial ports I do not quite
understand (and tend to not agree with). Can a serial ports guru take
a look at the PR:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211101
and comment here (or at the PR if you wish) on proposed changes (for
seria
On 09/27/16 06:27, Jonathan Chen wrote:
> On 27 September 2016 at 07:57, Sérgio de Almeida Lenzi
> wrote:
>> Em Seg, 2016-09-26 às 21:15 +1300, Jonathan Chen escreveu:
>>
>> k/gnucash-2.6.14/src'
>> gmake[2]: *** [Makefile:785: all-recursive] Error 1
>> gmake[2]: Leaving directory
>> '/tmp/usr/por
Can a committer have a look at this?
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212951
Thank you!
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you
30 matches
Mail list logo
