Hello, manager:
We have recently developed a new type of reducer.
If you are interested, please send me a mail.
z...@torkdrive.com
zhang feng
Sincerely
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-por
I am using pfsense and its package squid is having problem with
squidclamav Clamav c-icap service and redirector for Squid and
c-icap-modules Modules for c-icap: virus_scan and srv_url_check.
When I enable the antivirus of squid proxy, the browser will show ICAP
PROTOCOL ERROR.
The pfsense versio
On 01/09/16 00:12, Mark Martinec wrote:
I prefer to have a /var/run file system reside on a tmpfs
as its contents is small and ephemeral in its nature (like
pid files, lock files, sockets), need not be preserved across
reboots, and should not have to depend on any physical disk.
The problem is t
I prefer to have a /var/run file system reside on a tmpfs
as its contents is small and ephemeral in its nature (like
pid files, lock files, sockets), need not be preserved across
reboots, and should not have to depend on any physical disk.
The problem is that some programs/services/ports like to
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you
August 31, 2016 12:37 AM, "Bernard Spil" wrote:
> On 2016-08-30 17:45, Doug Barton wrote:
>
>> Since the last commit to the mariadb10* ports the resulting binaries
>> dump core on 9.3-RELEASE-p43, even for a simple --help option. I am
>> assuming that is not the intended result
>> Doug
>
>
On 2016-08-31 17:30, Stanislaw Halik wrote:
> On 2016-08-31 Wed 17:21, olli hauer wrote:
>> I think this will work for you.
>>
>> The update interval can be adjusted (default is 30 days).
>> In the patch example I've chosen half of the interval, so there is time left
>> in case you are offline for
On 2016-08-31 Wed 17:21, olli hauer wrote:
I think this will work for you.
The update interval can be adjusted (default is 30 days).
In the patch example I've chosen half of the interval, so there is time left in
case you are offline for an unforeseen reason
Index: Makefile
===
On 2016-08-31 13:17, James A. McGuire wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Since no-ip introduced their policy to remove non-updated subdomains every
> 30 days. I have to manually go to the no-ip website and confirm that I
> wish to keep my subdomain. I believe the reason for this is that my ISP is
> only upd
Ben Woods wrote:
Hi Max,
I run quassel on my home FreeBSD server and again on my FreeBSD laptop.
Because I do not want to bring in the numerous dependencies related with
the client application to my server, I unset the MONO and CLIENT options in
my poudriere make.conf. But of course that means
On 26.08.2016 21:38, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
Hi!
About resetting the maintainer, I'll ask around.
The rules are pretty clear:
https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/makefile-maintainer.html
It's more about: Who's willing to do it ?
As talked in private: i could/will do, since i
Hi!
> On 2016-08-31 Wed 13:36, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> >> It can sure be changed with a patch. I'd like however to wait for
> >> someone with ports commit bit to comment as to whether that change lies
> >> within the scope of what the ports tree does. My understanding is that
> >> the ports tree gene
On 31/08/2016 9:42 PM, Stanislaw Halik wrote:
> On 2016-08-31 Wed 13:36, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
>>> It can sure be changed with a patch. I'd like however to wait
>>> for someone with ports commit bit to comment as to whether that
>>> change lies within the scope of what the ports tree does. My
>>> unde
On 31/08/2016 9:33 PM, Stanislaw Halik wrote:
> Hey,
>
> It can sure be changed with a patch. I'd like however to wait for
> someone with ports commit bit to comment as to whether that change
> lies within the scope of what the ports tree does. My understanding
> is that the ports tree generally
On 2016-08-31 Wed 13:36, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
It can sure be changed with a patch. I'd like however to wait for
someone with ports commit bit to comment as to whether that change lies
within the scope of what the ports tree does. My understanding is that
the ports tree generally doesn't introduce n
Hi!
> It can sure be changed with a patch. I'd like however to wait for
> someone with ports commit bit to comment as to whether that change lies
> within the scope of what the ports tree does. My understanding is that
> the ports tree generally doesn't introduce new functionality.
I suggest t
On 2016-08-31 Wed 13:17, James A. McGuire wrote:
Since no-ip introduced their policy to remove non-updated subdomains
every 30 days. I have to manually go to the no-ip website and confirm
that I wish to keep my subdomain. I believe the reason for this is that
my ISP is only updating my dynamic
Hi there,
Since no-ip introduced their policy to remove non-updated subdomains every
30 days. I have to manually go to the no-ip website and confirm that I
wish to keep my subdomain. I believe the reason for this is that my ISP is
only updating my dynamic IP address every 60-90 days, and I belie
Dear all,
I initiated a long time ago a bug:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201455
As the new version was broken, I installed the old 4.x version and
locked the package.
I just downloaded manually the 6.2 version into /usr/local/src and
started it from there (it works perfect
Am 31.08.2016 um 12:06 schrieb Fernando Herrero Carrón:
> It probably makes sense, yes: http://www.mesa3d.org/llvmpipe.html
>
> LLVM is being used in more and more projects to optimize dynamically
> generated code, in this case software 3D rendering.
>
thanks, good to know.
Gruß
Matthias
--
"
It probably makes sense, yes: http://www.mesa3d.org/llvmpipe.html
LLVM is being used in more and more projects to optimize dynamically
generated code, in this case software 3D rendering.
2016-08-31 12:01 GMT+02:00 Matthias Fechner :
> Dear all,
>
>
> I just saw that I have for some installed pac
Dear all,
I just saw that I have for some installed packages llvm as run
dependency (e.g. graphics/libEGL) that it has a run dependency to llvm36:
cd /usr/ports
make search name=libEGL
R-deps: damageproto-1.2.1 ... llvm37-3.7.1_3 ...
Does this really makes sense or is this a bug in one of th
Le 31/08/2016 à 10:35, Dewayne Geraghty a écrit :
> Would it be possible for someone to increment the PORTREVISION for
> devel/binutils. The last three changes aren't being picked up due to a
> constant Version,Revision,Epoch sequence. And two of these changes are
> relevant.
> Thank-you.
From w
Would it be possible for someone to increment the PORTREVISION for
devel/binutils. The last three changes aren't being picked up due to a
constant Version,Revision,Epoch sequence. And two of these changes are
relevant.
Thank-you.
___
freebsd-ports@free
On 2016-08-30 17:45, Doug Barton wrote:
Since the last commit to the mariadb10* ports the resulting binaries
dump core on 9.3-RELEASE-p43, even for a simple --help option. I am
assuming that is not the intended result
Doug
Hi Doug,
Nope, that is not intended. Assume this is the 10.0.27 u
25 matches
Mail list logo
