This discussion has now been going on for a while. Several times the
question "Why should be do this?" has been asked and answered, but I want
to know why it is desirable to have ports use the base OpenSSL. Other than
the time and disk space required to install the OpenSSL package, I fail to
see th
On 07/09/16 22:40, Thierry Thomas wrote:
> Le sam 9 jul 16 à 20:35:59 +0200, Guido Falsi
> écrivait :
>
>> But that option will not change the basic problem of how the OS is
>> developed. FreeBSD base will anyway include OpenSSL even though users
>> can choose(and have been able to for a long w
Le sam 9 jul 16 à 20:35:59 +0200, Guido Falsi
écrivait :
> But that option will not change the basic problem of how the OS is
> developed. FreeBSD base will anyway include OpenSSL even though users
> can choose(and have been able to for a long while) too not install it.
But with a packaged bas
Hi!
> Add missing dependency to devel/gradle:
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208471
Done.
> which will help unbreak the build of java/openjfx8-devel:
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208470
testbuilds@work.
> And one for audio/portaudio which installs li
On 07/09/16 19:31, Thierry Thomas wrote:
> Le sam 9 jul 16 à 12:49:53 +0200, Guido Falsi
> écrivait :
>
>> Completely removing OpenSSL from base requires replacing it with some
>> other SSL implementation, or removing a lot of other goodies which
>> interface themselves with the external world
El 9 jul. 2016 3:13 p. m., "Guido Falsi" escribió:
>
> On 07/09/16 14:36, Fernando Herrero Carrón wrote:
> > El 9 jul. 2016 10:33 a. m., "Wojciech Puchar"
escribió:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, 8 Jul 2016, Mikhail T. wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 08.07.2016 02:26, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
>
> During
Le sam 9 jul 16 à 12:49:53 +0200, Guido Falsi
écrivait :
> Completely removing OpenSSL from base requires replacing it with some
> other SSL implementation, or removing a lot of other goodies which
> interface themselves with the external world from base.
Well, anyway, we are going to a packag
All with no maintainer response after > 14 days.
Add missing dependency to devel/gradle:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208471
which will help unbreak the build of java/openjfx8-devel:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208470
And one for audio/portaudio which in
On 07/09/16 14:36, Fernando Herrero Carrón wrote:
> El 9 jul. 2016 10:33 a. m., "Wojciech Puchar" escribió:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 8 Jul 2016, Mikhail T. wrote:
>>
>>> On 08.07.2016 02:26, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
During this summer (sometime in August I think) I will be changing the
> default
El 9 jul. 2016 10:33 a. m., "Wojciech Puchar" escribió:
>
>
>
> On Fri, 8 Jul 2016, Mikhail T. wrote:
>
>> On 08.07.2016 02:26, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
>>>
>>> During this summer (sometime in August I think) I will be changing the
default OpenSSL for the ports tree from the base system version to
se
On 28/06/2016 4:06 AM, Russell Haley wrote:
> Hello Ports Team,
>
> A couple of us on the freebsd-mono@ mailing list are having a
> discussion on how best to maintain the mono ports/.net ports. One of
> the things that has come up is maintaining the patches for "all this
> stuff". The current para
Dear all,
I finally could manage to sync my local mess into some "shipable form"
and updated the bsd-sharp github repository with current WIP:
https://github.com/smortex/bsd-sharp
My main issue is devel/newtonsoft-json which fails to build. I could
not manage to get more time to search for the
On 07/09/16 12:19, Gerard Seibert wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Jul 2016 10:32:35 +0200, Wojciech Puchar stated:
>
>> Why openssl is a part of base system at all?
>
> Interesting question. Perl was removed from the base system years ago
> with no ill affects.
>
There's a kerberos implementation in base wh
Gerard Seibert wrote:
On Sat, 9 Jul 2016 10:32:35 +0200, Wojciech Puchar stated:
Why openssl is a part of base system at all?
Interesting question. Perl was removed from the base system years ago
with no ill affects.
ssh ...?
(and maybe the up and coming systemd ..! :P (joking))
--
Michell
On Sat, 9 Jul 2016 10:32:35 +0200, Wojciech Puchar stated:
>Why openssl is a part of base system at all?
Interesting question. Perl was removed from the base system years ago
with no ill affects.
--
Carmel
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
ht
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you
Xin Li wrote:
On 7/8/16 12:20, Grzegorz Junka wrote:
The only reason I heard why base isn't updated with the proper package
from ports is because of security implications. Older versions are more
security-tested and therefore safer. If there is a vulnerability in the
base it's much more hassle
On Fri, 8 Jul 2016, Mikhail T. wrote:
On 08.07.2016 02:26, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
During this summer (sometime in August I think) I will be changing the default
OpenSSL for the ports tree from the base system version to security/openssl.
The short answer is "Why?!" The longer reaction is: "p
On 7/8/16 12:20, Grzegorz Junka wrote:
>
> The only reason I heard why base isn't updated with the proper package
> from ports is because of security implications. Older versions are more
> security-tested and therefore safer. If there is a vulnerability in the
> base it's much more hassle to up
On 08/07/2016 23:59, Kevin Oberman wrote:
On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 12:20 PM, Grzegorz Junka wrote:
On 08/07/2016 16:29, Mikhail T. wrote:
On 08.07.2016 02:26, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
During this summer (sometime in August I think) I will be changing the
default OpenSSL for the ports tree from
20 matches
Mail list logo
