You should be able to use ports-mgmt/portdowngrade. This assumes that you
still have the distribution file, as I suspect that it's no longer
available for download from Mozilla. Check, though.
On Jun 7, 2016 5:07 PM, "Bob Willcox" wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 03:16:01PM -0400, Naram Qashat wr
On Jun 7, 2016 11:07 AM, "Michael Gmelin" wrote:
>
> On Wed, 1 Jun 2016 18:36:17 -0300
> "rollingbits (Lucas)" wrote:
>
> > I've a local package repository which I could access using pkg with
> > the ssh scheme until the last update. I update the packages once a
> > week. pkg went from 1.7.2 to 1
hi there,
i thought i'd let you know that i've been working on a port of ardour
version 4.7, you can find it here:
https://github.com/tbrodel/freebsd-ports/tree/master/audio/ardour47
i've done some basic work in it over the last couple of months and
everything seems to be stable.
ardour2 s
Hi!
> The ports tree has thousands of entries, which are simply thin wrappers
> around Ruby's gem or Perl's and/or Python's pip.
Thanks again for asking the right questions. Please add go to that
list 8-}
> Why do we need them? Obviously, it is primarily
> for other ports to be able to depend
Hi!
[maven and resolving dependencies by download at build time]
> Ports-system needs some way of dealing with these issues properly and
> orderly. What should the strategy be?
Thanks for formulating the question.
> How about allowing a port to declare the following needs, which would be
> tak
On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 03:16:01PM -0400, Naram Qashat wrote:
> I'm of the opinion that the Firefox port was updated to 47 very
> prematurely. Even though the SVN commit note says it was a release
> candidate, I don't usually look at commit notes when I've updated my
> ports tree and ran into so
FWIW, Mozilla released the real version 47 today. Once it is in ports,
perhaps your problem will be resolved (and, perhaps not).
Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer
E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com
PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683
On Tue, Jun 7, 20
The ports tree has thousands of entries, which are simply thin wrappers
around Ruby's gem or Perl's and/or Python's pip.
Most of these ports conWhy do we need them? Obviously, it is primarily
for other ports to be able to depend on them. But why can't we satisfy
this need without creating a po
Application-authors using maven tend to rely on the tool to download --
at build-time -- the third-party JARs their application needs to build
and/or run. The number of such downloads can be substantial.
For example, to build jruby from source (which the port is not currently
doing), mvn downl
Binary works fine for me on my MacBook (OS/X), if that helps.
--
Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU) "Those who don't understand security will suffer."
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubs
On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 08:04:23AM -0453, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
>
> FWIW, I just checked available pkg's using 'pkg version -vRL=' & nothing
> showed up for firefox: You might be a bit closer to the *bleeding* edge
> than you think w/ the ports version. I'm using firefox-46.0.1,1 from
On 06/07/16 16:29, pathiaki2 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The Asterisk port is VERY out of date. Asterisk 1.8 is deprecated. What
> are the plans for having a 2.x version?
The asterisk developers have modified the version numbering after
version 1.8.
They decided they will never make a version 2.0, so they
Hi,
The Asterisk port is VERY out of date. Asterisk 1.8 is deprecated. What
are the plans for having a 2.x version?
Thank you,
Paul
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe,
On Wed, 1 Jun 2016 18:36:17 -0300
"rollingbits (Lucas)" wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I've a local package repository which I could access using pkg with
> the ssh scheme until the last update. I update the packages once a
> week. pkg went from 1.7.2 to 1.8.3 here. The error message is that
> repository has
Bob,
I bet your problems are related to building from ports. I used to have
lots of troubles when trying to build directly from the ports tree or
using portmaster/portupgrade - either it couldn't built cleanly or the
applications were misbehaving in all sort of strange ways. I switched to
pou
Thanks for the reply Grzegroz. I've since discovered that I still do
get the dialog box about the stopped script popping up sometimes (even
when I don't go to cnn.com, though that seems to exacerbate it).
Just for completeness, here's the text of the recent popup:
On 06/07/16 07:54, Bob Willcox wrote:
Hi Grzegorz,
I altered my configuration to match what you list below and rebuilt/installed
firefox. I no longer get the dialog box about the script not working but
cnn.com still doesn't load as expected. It now will eventually complete but it
takes several m
Hi Bob,
I don't believe it's possible to revert ports to a previous version
(other than through SVN). However, if you have the older version of the
firefox package (e.g.
/usr/local/poudriere/data/packages/your-system/All) you should be able
to just point pkg to it.
But before doing that I w
Hi Grzegorz,
I altered my configuration to match what you list below and rebuilt/installed
firefox. I no longer get the dialog box about the script not working but
cnn.com still doesn't load as expected. It now will eventually complete but it
takes several minutes (I didn't precisely time it, but
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you
20 matches
Mail list logo
