On 10/28/2015 5:36 PM, Mel Pilgrim wrote:
> Nearly every time I send a maintainer update, there's some new method I
> don't know about. There's nothing about it on ports or ports-announce
> and porttools/portlint don't mention it either. I end up scanning
> through commits to ports/head/Mk to fin
Nearly every time I send a maintainer update, there's some new method I
don't know about. There's nothing about it on ports or ports-announce
and porttools/portlint don't mention it either. I end up scanning
through commits to ports/head/Mk to find them after the fact.
What do I need to do t
Hi Bryan,
On 10/28/15 15:10, Bryan Drewery wrote:
On 10/23/2015 9:34 AM, Russell L. Carter wrote:
Greetings,
Recently my nightly cron poudriere builds have been occasionally
hanging. For instance, here's last night's, with apparently no
progress for over 10 hours:
root@terpsichore> poudrier
On 10/23/2015 9:34 AM, Russell L. Carter wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
> Recently my nightly cron poudriere builds have been occasionally
> hanging. For instance, here's last night's, with apparently no
> progress for over 10 hours:
>
> root@terpsichore> poudriere status
> SET PORTS JAIL
HI Ricky,
I recently have a new family member and I can not continue to maintain the
ports for some time. I am sorry. Best, Jingfeng
On Monday, October 19, 2015 8:36 PM, Ricky Gallamore
wrote:
www/seahub https://reviews.freebsd.org/D3943www/py-seafdav
https://reviews.fre
Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote:
> You are looking for multiple-choice.
That's the one I overlooked. Thanks!
AvW
--
I'm not completely useless, I can be used as a bad example.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello Fonz,
I'm working on a port that has two options, of which at least one must be
selected, but selecting both is OK too. Can somebody please point me to an
existing port (surely there must be some already) that has this, so I can
see how to use the options framework in this case?
Have a l
A.J. "Fonz" van Werven wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm working on a port that has two options, of which at least one must be
> selected, but selecting both is OK too. Can somebody please point me to an
> existing port (surely there must be some already) that has this, so I can
> see how to use the options
Hi all,
I'm working on a port that has two options, of which at least one must be
selected, but selecting both is OK too. Can somebody please point me to an
existing port (surely there must be some already) that has this, so I can
see how to use the options framework in this case?
Thanks in advan
Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> IIRC portmaster only creates packages as backup of the installed version
> just in case the new package will fail it can reinstall the old one
[snip]
> Note that the backup thing of portmaster could now possibly be removed
> since the ports tree support staging because
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 08:22:34AM +0100 I heard the voice of
Baptiste Daroussin, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> IIRC portmaster only creates packages as backup of the installed
> version just in case the new package will fail it can reinstall the
> old one in that case, yes a tgz would be way faster,
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 10:05:49PM -0700, sor...@cydem.org wrote:
>
> Howdy!
>
> I have a suggestion: to significantly speedup the packaging phase
> when installing ports, pass '-f tgz' flag to `pkg create`:
>--- Mk/bsd.commands.mk (revision 400371)
>+++ Mk/bsd.commands.mk (working co
12 matches
Mail list logo
