Re: print/cups: PageLog remains empty

2015-08-23 Thread Dr. Peter Voigt
On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 16:01:12 -1000 Kevin Oberman wrote: > I just took a look and I have the same issue. Last entry in page_log > was back on May 16, so it's been broken for a while. Thanks for quick feedback. I've submitted a corresponding PR: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2

Re: Recent changes to /usr/ports/Mk breaks /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/p5-FreeBSD-Portindex

2015-08-23 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 20/08/2015 00:13, Naram Qashat wrote: >> The changes to port Mk files breaks >> /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/p5-FreeBSD-Portindex: >> >> When doing cache-init I get this: >> >> Processing make describe output for path "/usr/ports": Can't locate object >> method "mark_used_by" via package "FreeBSD::Port

Re: ports dev testing with Poudriere, Just noticed 8.4 is no longer supported

2015-08-23 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hello, > So, I've not been paying attention to FreeBSD announcements for > a while. I am just teaching myself how to use Poudriere in order > to submit my first ports. I noticed there is no 8.4 RELEASE for > poudriere's create jail command. There only appears to be images > for 9.3, 10.1 and 10.2.

ports dev testing with Poudriere, Just noticed 8.4 is no longer supported

2015-08-23 Thread Euan Thoms
So, I've not been paying attention to FreeBSD announcements for a while. I am just teaching myself how to use Poudriere in order to submit my first ports. I noticed there is no 8.4 RELEASE for poudriere's create jail command. There only appears to be images for 9.3, 10.1 and 10.2. Well, that's

(clean) ghostscript9-base-9.06_11 port installation aborts

2015-08-23 Thread Jos Chrispijn
___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

2015-08-23 Thread portscout
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you

Re: Running ''portmaster ghostscript9-9.06_10'' takes a lot of time

2015-08-23 Thread Torfinn Ingolfsen
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 10:23 PM, Peter Jeremy wrote: > > On my E3-1230v2 system (not a slouch), the difference is 1s to 110s - > which is in line with Matthew's results. Yes, this change makes ports almost unusable on FreeBSD 9.3-stable. > > A two-orders-of-magnitude slowdown in make startup is

Re: Removal of print/ghostscript*-nox11

2015-08-23 Thread Carlos J Puga Medina
I switched to the new ghostscript port using portmaster as follows # portmaster -o print/ghostscript9-x11 print/ghostscript9 but it's necessary to ignore the creation of the old ghostscript package. After all above, I ran # portmaster -a -- Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina PGP fingerprint = C60E 9