Please upgrade php56 port to latest release.
Regards,
Michael
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
I have submitted a patch to add a port: biology/bcftools.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199747
The port is dual licensed (MIT/GPL); however, If it is compiled with
option GPL, then some features are enabled with require it to be
licensed under GPL.
I've solved this by choosi
## Avinash Sonawane (root...@gmail.com):
> Is anybody using FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE able to build www/chromium on
> his/her end? I'm still getting the same error.
Yes. Both, chromium and firefox, compile and work just fine, here.
As both fail in roughly the same way, I still suspect your python
inst
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 6:21 AM, Mark Felder wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, May 20, 2015, at 17:48, Xin Li wrote:
> ]>
> > Well, currently OpenSSL do accept weak DH so _arguably_ it does affect
> > FreeBSD, and it's likely to break existing applications if we enforce
> > such restrictions (namely, Java 6).
On Wed, May 20, 2015, at 17:48, Xin Li wrote:
]>
> Well, currently OpenSSL do accept weak DH so _arguably_ it does affect
> FreeBSD, and it's likely to break existing applications if we enforce
> such restrictions (namely, Java 6).
>
AFAIK, Java doesn't support >1024 DH key until Java 8.
_
Ok, I've updated the port and it passes portlint (with one warning that
I can't seem to fix without introducing more warnings). Is the next step
to create a Phabricator review request via arcanist? If so, do I list
the folks you replied to this thread as reviewers? :) I suppose I would
also list pe
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 7:57 PM, Avinash Sonawane wrote:
> Hello!
>
> # uname -a
> FreeBSD titanic.rootkea.me 10.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE #0
> r274401: Tue Nov 11 21:02:49 UTC 2014
> r...@releng1.nyi.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
>
> When I tried to build www/firefox the co
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 8:01 PM, Avinash Sonawane wrote:
> Hello!
>
> # uname -a
> FreeBSD titanic.rootkea.me 10.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE #0
> r274401: Tue Nov 11 21:02:49 UTC 2014
> r...@releng1.nyi.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
>
> When I tried to build www/chromium the c
On 21/05/2015 2:45 AM, sergio de Almeida Lenzi wrote:
> For me the solution is in the PR
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194345
>
> an explanation is there and a patch that solved for me...
>
>
Thanks for prodding Sergio.
I have moved the issue from In Progress (incorrect) t
On 05/20/15 23:48, Xin Li wrote:
> The document at https://weakdh.org/sysadmin.html gives additional
> information for individual daemons, including Apache (mod_ssl), nginx,
> lighttpd, Tomcat, postfix, sendmail, dovecot and HAProxy.
The part of that https://weakdh.org/ site that concerns me most
Hi,
> The document at https://weakdh.org/sysadmin.html gives additional
> information for individual daemons, including Apache (mod_ssl), nginx,
> lighttpd, Tomcat, postfix, sendmail, dovecot and HAProxy.
>
Unfortunately the documentation does only offer guidance for Apache 2.4.
As Apache 2.2 do
11 matches
Mail list logo