On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 9:26 AM, Dr. Peter Voigt wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Nov 2014 14:40:21 +0100
> "Dr. Peter Voigt" wrote:
>
> > I am on 10.1-RELEASE (amd64) and I am currently using GnuPG 2.0.26:
> >
> > # pkg version |grep gnupg
> > gnupg-2.0.26_1 <
> >
> > However, GnuPG 2.1
Hi,
Sorry to bother you, but I have a question about the ghostscript9 port...
We have some issues with imageMagick which has a dependencie to this port and
I've been told the problem is due to the old version of ghostscript I am
using...
>From this release history page:
>http://www.ghostscrip
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I'm a developer of ettercap.
I'm trying to improve the native support of ettercap on FreeBSD.
Therefore I try to compile it from source on FreeBSD.
However after fixing a number of cmake issues, I've been able to compile
the program as normal on
Hi Chipsquips.Com
Hope you are doing well.
I thought you might like to know some of the reasons why you are not
getting enough Organic search engine and Social Media traffic for your
website.
Running and maintaining a website is not easy! With continuously changing
digital market and i
It has been my practice for several years to email sensitive information
(such as passwords) to myself via envrypted email, using mutt and GPG.
This morning, one of the ports that was updated when I performed my
daily refresh of installed ports on my laptop was:
Upgrade gnupg-2.0.26_1 to
> r372654 | alfred | 2014-11-16 23:55:10 +0100 (Sun, 16 Nov 2014) | 4 lines
> Use vimrc from distribution.
> Suggested by: many.
There are significant problems with copying the *sample* vimrc to be used as
the system vimrc.
First of all, there is no way to disable reading it; even when ~/.vimr
On Thu, 20 Nov 2014 14:40:21 +0100
"Dr. Peter Voigt" wrote:
> I am on 10.1-RELEASE (amd64) and I am currently using GnuPG 2.0.26:
>
> # pkg version |grep gnupg
> gnupg-2.0.26_1 <
>
> However, GnuPG 2.1 is offered as an update:
>
> # pkg version -vIL=
> gnupg-2.0.26_1
Fabian Keil writes:
> Vitaly Magerya wrote:
>> I don't know what this part is supposed to do:
>>
>> # Workaround to make sure clang isn't confused for gcc
>> CC=${COMPILER_TYPE}
>>
>> ... but it seems to set CC to empty string on my machine; and I
>> get a whole bunch of this as the re
Vitaly Magerya wrote:
> On 11/20/14 17:02, Fabian Keil wrote:
> > Does it work for you if you replace the line with:
> > MAKE_ARGS+= CC=${COMPILER_TYPE}
> > ?
>
> Yes, this fixes all the problems; AFL now installs fine.
Great, thanks for the feedback. I updated the shar file in place.
Fabian
On 11/20/14 17:02, Fabian Keil wrote:
> 0.57b and later have "[f]ixes to make things work on FreeBSD and
> OpenBSD: use_64bit is inferred if not explicitly specified when
> calling afl-as".
>
> If you started with an earlier release, this might have been
> the problem.
I was working with version 0
Vitaly Magerya wrote:
> On 2014-11-20 14:43, Fabian Keil wrote:> Quoting the pkg-descr:
> > | American fuzzy lop is a fuzzer that employs a novel type of compile-time
> > | instrumentation and genetic algorithms to automatically discover clean,
> > | interesting test cases that trigger new intern
On 2014-11-20 14:43, Fabian Keil wrote:> Quoting the pkg-descr:
> | American fuzzy lop is a fuzzer that employs a novel type of compile-time
> | instrumentation and genetic algorithms to automatically discover clean,
> | interesting test cases that trigger new internal states in the targeted
> | bi
I am on 10.1-RELEASE (amd64) and I am currently using GnuPG 2.0.26:
# pkg version |grep gnupg
gnupg-2.0.26_1 <
However, GnuPG 2.1 is offered as an update:
# pkg version -vIL=
gnupg-2.0.26_1 < needs updating (index has 2.1.0)
Inspecting the ports tree sh
On 11/20/14 12:53, Jerry wrote:
> Are you recommending that we should update to the newer development branch or
> will the older stable branch be updated shortly to reflect the demise of the
> known bugs?
No. If you're already running pkg-devel, then please update to the
latest pkg-devel. Known
Russell L. Carter wrote:
> I do not love the 2+ hours it takes to build the text/latex-texmf
> port. I use pkg(8) to maintain a cluster of machines, and I've
> checked the major culprits and I don't see how the latex-texmf
> dependency occurs. (I don't specify it explicitly.)
[snip]
> What is th
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 04:24:46AM -0800, Jeffrey Bouquet via freebsd-stable
wrote:
>
> On 11/20/14 04:19, Jeffrey Bouquet wrote:
> > Only one port has not failed at "pkg install port" ... after today's
> > update and
> > also failed at deinstall pkg >> install pkg-devel to try to fix it.
> >
> >
On Thu, 20 Nov 2014 13:13:15 +0100, Baptiste Daroussin stated:
>We pkg is now at 1.4.0.b2 which have addressed all the reported bygs
Port: pkg-devel-1.4.0.b2
Path: /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg-devel
Info: Package manager
The regular branch is older.
Port: pkg-1.3.8_3
Path: /usr/ports/por
I'm looking for testers for a port of American fuzzy lop.
Quoting the pkg-descr:
| American fuzzy lop is a fuzzer that employs a novel type of compile-time
| instrumentation and genetic algorithms to automatically discover clean,
| interesting test cases that trigger new internal states in the tar
On 11/20/14 04:19, Jeffrey Bouquet wrote:
> Only one port has not failed at "pkg install port" ... after today's
> update and
> also failed at deinstall pkg >> install pkg-devel to try to fix it.
>
> [ Duplicate post, so I could post the error and this update. ]
>
>
> Script started on Thu Nov 20
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 03:59:51AM -0800, Jeffrey Bouquet via freebsd-ports
wrote:
> pkg update
> Downloaded new pkg database today.
>
> pkg install >>> abort trap
> every two of three "pkg install ..." (only one has proceeded.)
>
> This browser won't permit paste-ins, I've posted it in the fo
pkg update
Downloaded new pkg database today.
pkg install >>> abort trap
every two of three "pkg install ..." (only one has proceeded.)
This browser won't permit paste-ins, I've posted it in the forum in two threads
(Xorg and Ports sections)
pkg-1.4.0a3
Q 2is this to be addressed to free
Each time Opera is re-started (or started for first time), it looses track of
all plugins. Plugins (like flash) must be re-introduced.
Start Opera, go to "opera:plugins", nothing.
Go to: Settings > preferences > content > Plug-in options => shows empty list
Find New => Plugins get listed, "opera:
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you
23 matches
Mail list logo
