https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178364
Eitan Adler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|ead...@freebsd.org |freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
--- Commen
Hi,
A tarball of the original software has 2 subdirs in it:
1) subdir1 with a regular perl module with a Makefile.PL
2) subdir2 with related i18n stuff with a GNU Makefile.
How to port this software?
Was only able to invent a solution with two different ports (myport and
myport-i18n) which shar
On 09/14/14 16:34, Matt Reimer wrote:
I'd like to switch from building everything from source using ports to
using packages as much as possible. This requires identifying which ports
I'm currently building use the same port knobs as the binary packages that
FreeBSD builds. Is there an easy way of
On 09/14/14 16:34, Matt Reimer wrote:
I'd like to switch from building everything from source using ports to
using packages as much as possible. This requires identifying which ports
I'm currently building use the same port knobs as the binary packages that
FreeBSD builds. Is there an easy way of
Same here If help is needed , do let me know as well ,
Regards ,
> Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: courier-0.65.3_3
> From: ad...@saigol.ca
> Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 11:08:49 -0400
> To: freebsd-po...@dino.sk
> CC: po...@freebsd.org
>
> Hello Milan,
>
> I am happy to help any way I can. I'm not
Am 15.09.2014 um 01:07 schrieb Marco Steinbach:
> Hi.
>
> Is there a way to tell pkg delete to just remove the package(s) listed
> on the command line, instead of automatically removing depending packages ?
Try: pkg delete -f somepackage
___
freebsd-p
Hi.
Is there a way to tell pkg delete to just remove the package(s) listed
on the command line, instead of automatically removing depending packages ?
MfG CoCo
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/free
On Sep 12, 2014, at 14:38, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> "No" (as portmgr).
>
> Ports should not be touching the base system like this. Let's NOT go
> backwards and add a /bin/bash. In fact the /usr/bin/perl one will be
> removed soon as well.
>
> If we can actually eliminate ports touching /usr and /
On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 08:39:17PM +0100, Dreamcat4 wrote:
> Right, well here is another one:
>
> The missing symlink for /etc/ssl/cert.pem
>
> There is no reason it should not be in
>
> ${prefix}/etc/ssl/cert.pem
>
> Except that the folder etc/ssl/ only exists in base.
>
> Without this symlin
I'd like to switch from building everything from source using ports to
using packages as much as possible. This requires identifying which ports
I'm currently building use the same port knobs as the binary packages that
FreeBSD builds. Is there an easy way of showing how my port configs differ
from
Hello Milan,
I am happy to help any way I can. I'm not very knowledgeable about compiling
and linking, but can certainly help with the testing.
Thanks and regards,
Abid
--
Sent from Abid's iPad
> On Sep 14, 2014, at 1:54 AM, Milan Obuch wrote:
>
> On Sun, 14 Sep 2014 01:16:03 -0400
> "Saig
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you
Hi,
2 of the ports i am maintaing had unauthorized changes from the
ga...@freebsd.org (see [1]). This commit wrongly changing license and
disabling distribution for no reason. I am asking to revert this changes ASAP
and never do such weird things in the future, thank you.
https://bugs.freeb
13 matches
Mail list logo
