- use OPTIONS_SINGLE
- merge defines to master
-
Build ID: 20131219072800-25611
Job owner: din...@freebsd.org
Buildtime: 20 minutes
Enddate: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 07:48:16 GMT
Revision:
- use STAGEDIR
-
Build ID: 20131219074000-61172
Job owner: din...@freebsd.org
Buildtime: 8 minutes
Enddate: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 07:48:27 GMT
Revision: r336877
Repository:
On 18/12/2013 20:38, Albert Shih wrote:
> Le 09/12/2013 à 22:05:02-0600, Larry Rosenman a écrit
>
> Hi,
>
> I've a close (but different) problem :
>
> Everything is compiling but when I try to install I get this message :
>
> ===> Building package for rt42-4.2.1_2
> Creating package
On 19/12/2013 4:26 AM, Marcus von Appen wrote:
> On behalf of the FreeBSD python team, I'd like to announce that the
> lang/python port has been removed as an implicit port dependency for
> ports using USE_PYTHON, USE_PYTHON_BUILD and USE_PYTHON_RUN in revision
> 336850.
>
> Why?
>
> The remova
Hi,
On Wed, 18 Dec 2013 11:46:58 +0100
David Demelier wrote:
> 2013/12/17 John Marino :
> > Over the months I've seen several ports users copy a failure log and
> > mail it to ports@, usually without even saying "hello". I've tried
> > to discourage that behavior but other members of this mail
There are many messages on this thread, and I don't know which or what to
quote, but I agree on send-pr being user-unfriendly.
One problem is setting up mail with outbound SMTP server: sendmail is too
mysterious/mystic to be useful.
I think most email clients set up to use POP3 and SMTP server
On 18 дек. 2013 г., at 21:26, Marcus von Appen wrote:
> On behalf of the FreeBSD python team, I'd like to announce that the
> lang/python port has been removed as an implicit port dependency for
> ports using USE_PYTHON, USE_PYTHON_BUILD and USE_PYTHON_RUN in revision
> 336850.
>
Finally!
Th
- Update from 4.9 to 4.9.1
- Convert USE_GMAKE to USES
- Add stage support
- Convert LIB_DEPENDS to new syntax
while here:
- Convert some "if's" to options helpers
PR: ports/184838
Submitted by: KATO Tsuguru
-
B
Le 09/12/2013 à 22:05:02-0600, Larry Rosenman a écrit
Hi,
I've a close (but different) problem :
Everything is compiling but when I try to install I get this message :
===> Building package for rt42-4.2.1_2
Creating package /usr/ports/www/rt42/work/rt42-4.2.1_2.tbz
Registering d
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 12:59 PM, William Grzybowski
wrote:
> Who will be taking the lead of this change so we
> can refer to?
bugmeister@ is always the contact address to use.
gonzo has been doing most of the technical work
I've been doing a lot of the workflow / administrative work. A lot of
Use new LIB_DEPENDS regime
-
Build ID: 20131218150800-33876
Job owner: eha...@freebsd.org
Buildtime: 3 hours
Enddate: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 17:59:54 GMT
Revision: r336838
Reposit
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Eitan Adler wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Lars Engels
> wrote:
> > Am 2013-12-17 23:33, schrieb John Marino:
> >
> >> Over the months I've seen several ports users copy a failure log and
> >> mail it to ports@, usually without even saying "hello". I
Update opus to 1.1, which includes:
* new analysis code and tuning that significantly improves encoding
quality, especially for variable-bitrate (VBR),
* automatic detection of speech or music to decide which encoding
mode to use,
* surround with good quality at 128 kbps for 5.1 and usable down
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Lars Engels wrote:
> Am 2013-12-17 23:33, schrieb John Marino:
>
>> Over the months I've seen several ports users copy a failure log and
>> mail it to ports@, usually without even saying "hello". I've tried to
>> discourage that behavior but other members of this
On behalf of the FreeBSD python team, I'd like to announce that the
lang/python port has been removed as an implicit port dependency for
ports using USE_PYTHON, USE_PYTHON_BUILD and USE_PYTHON_RUN in revision
336850.
Why?
The removal is necessary to bring us a step closer to building and
inst
- Update to 1.249
- Add LICENSE
- Update and sort *_DEPENDS
- Use USES=gmake
- Sort make knobs
- Support STAGEDIR
PR: ports/184700
Submitted by: sunpoet
-
Build ID: 20131218170400-35501
Job owner:
- use STAGEDIR
- use OPTIONS_DEFINE
- honor option EXAMPLES
- use pkg-message
- change default path for over.view, note in UPDATING
-
Build ID: 20131218162800-19044
Job owner: din...@freebsd.org
Buildtime:
- Update to 1.224
- Add LICENSE
- Support STAGEDIR
PR: ports/184702
Submitted by: sunpoet
-
Build ID: 20131218155000-28448
Job owner: swi...@freebsd.org
Buildtime: 68 minutes
Enddate
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 04:31:57PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> What's our policy for putting $FreeBSD$ keywords in the various
> files that make up a port? Or rather, what should our policy be?
>
> By convention, there is a $FreeBSD$ in the port Makefile. Over on
> OpenBSD, the policy i
What's our policy for putting $FreeBSD$ keywords in the various
files that make up a port? Or rather, what should our policy be?
By convention, there is a $FreeBSD$ in the port Makefile. Over on
OpenBSD, the policy is to put such keywords into all files that can
hold them: at the top of patch fi
Am 2013-12-17 23:33, schrieb John Marino:
Over the months I've seen several ports users copy a failure log and
mail it to ports@, usually without even saying "hello". I've tried to
discourage that behavior but other members of this mail list encourage
this method of bypassing writing PRs. One u
2013/12/18 David Demelier :
>
> On 18/12/2013 09:53, David Demelier wrote:
>>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> The port emulation/virtualbox-ose-additions successfully builds on my
>> machine but not when trying to bulk in a poudriere :
>>
>> kmk_redirect: error: _execvp(_P_WAIT, "python", ...) failed: No such
>
On 18/12/2013 09:53, David Demelier wrote:
Hi there,
The port emulation/virtualbox-ose-additions successfully builds on my
machine but not when trying to bulk in a poudriere :
kmk_redirect: error: _execvp(_P_WAIT, "python", ...) failed: No such
file or directory
kmk_redirect: error: _execvp(_P
On 12/18/2013 13:12, Marcus von Appen wrote:
> John Marino :
>
>> Over the months I've seen several ports users copy a failure log and
>> mail it to ports@, usually without even saying "hello". I've tried to
First I want to address "hello". People have been interpreting this
literally, as in li
John Marino :
Over the months I've seen several ports users copy a failure log and
mail it to ports@, usually without even saying "hello". I've tried to
Do the QAT reports bug you on this list? If they do not, why is that so?
I did not see you complain about those.
discourage that behavior
Use new LIB_DEPENDS regime
-
Build ID: 20131218114200-27463
Job owner: eha...@freebsd.org
Buildtime: 37 minutes
Enddate: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 12:19:19 GMT
Revision: r336817
Repo
>Markiyan Kushnir :
>
>There's already ports-bugs@ for issues with ports (see the info on
>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs).
>And this also would be the correct address for QAT reports, which
>are actually spamming the ports@ list (also imho).
>
>Personally, I do not th
Markiyan Kushnir :
It sounds like a need for a more grained structure of the
ports-related communication, just because the community is growing.
Very often there is a need to discuss one's issue in a list prior to
filing a PR. And yes, *discuss*, I agree with John, people should show
they want t
emulators/hugo: Correctly reset maintainer to po...@freebsd.org (typo)
Reported by:mva
-
Build ID: 20131218111601-30270
Job owner: ko...@freebsd.org
Buildtime: 11 minutes
Enddate: We
- Update to 1.8.0
Changes:
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~jendrikseipp/rednotebook/trunk/view/head:/CHANGELOG
PR: ports/184734
Submitted by: Hon-Yu Lawrence Cheung (maintainer)
-
Build ID: 20131218
On mar, 17 dc 2013, John Marino wrote:
> Over the months I've seen several ports users copy a failure log and
> mail it to ports@, usually without even saying "hello". I've tried to
> discourage that behavior but other members of this mail list encourage
> this method of bypassing writing PRs. O
2013/12/17 John Marino :
> Over the months I've seen several ports users copy a failure log and
> mail it to ports@, usually without even saying "hello". I've tried to
> discourage that behavior but other members of this mail list encourage
> this method of bypassing writing PRs. One user even pr
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you
On 18-12-2013 5:22, J M wrote:
Following this list:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-x11/2013-December/013911.html
Rebuild xorg again on FreeBSD 10.0 rc2:
WITH_NEW_XORG=
WITH_KMS=
WITH_GALLIUM=
Build es2tri.c in mesa demos
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/demos/tree/src/egl/opengles2/
Hi there,
The port emulation/virtualbox-ose-additions successfully builds on my
machine but not when trying to bulk in a poudriere :
kmk_redirect: error: _execvp(_P_WAIT, "python", ...) failed: No such
file or directory
kmk_redirect: error: _execvp(_P_WAIT, "python", ...) failed: No such
file or
It sounds like a need for a more grained structure of the
ports-related communication, just because the community is growing.
Very often there is a need to discuss one's issue in a list prior to
filing a PR. And yes, *discuss*, I agree with John, people should show
they want to discuss their failed
36 matches
Mail list logo
