On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 6:54 AM, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> Ok, I know this is partly my fault for not being specific enough, but
> after a pkg install python installed 2.7 and not 2.6 and the full set
> of 3.x versions, I was ok, lets just do the same for subversion...
>
> Of course I also didn't r
Ok, I know this is partly my fault for not being specific enough, but
after a pkg install python installed 2.7 and not 2.6 and the full set
of 3.x versions, I was ok, lets just do the same for subversion...
Of course I also didn't read that it was going to install 1.6.23_2,
1.7.13 AND 1.8.3 when y
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 11:58 PM, Eitan Adler wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> > El día Friday, October 11, 2013 a las 06:16:23PM -0500, Matthew D.
> Fuller escribió:
> >
> >> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 09:37:13AM +0200 I heard the voice of
> >> Matthias Apitz, and
I try to use only portmaster and/or directly with the port using make,
etc. It seems like the pkg stuff ends up biting me every so often. I far
prefer compiling to packages.
Hopefully my question is simple. I would love to make the pkg stuff
disappear and only use the ports tree directly or wit
Hello! There is good news.
After some investigations I found solve.
I sent my report to FreeBSD-gnats (
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=183691).
In attachment you can see patches for source files.
If you do not complicate, test them.
2013/11/2 Fernando Apesteguía
>
> El 01/11/2013 18
Larry Rosenman wrote:
> I got a PR about sysutils/lsof not getting installed sgid kmem.
I'm surprised. It doesn't even build right now.
> I'm not sure with all the new staging stuff (sunpoet did it for me) how
> to fix it.
>
> What's the incantation I need?
The best way is to set special own
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 2:09 PM, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> On 05/11/2013 14:55, Chad J. Milios wrote:
>> TLDR; check lines prefixed with ? in the transcript below.
>>
>> Ran into this over a couple weeks ago. Checked again with last night's
>> portsnap, same problem, same ports. Figured I ought to
On 05/11/2013 14:55, Chad J. Milios wrote:
> TLDR; check lines prefixed with ? in the transcript below.
>
> Ran into this over a couple weeks ago. Checked again with last night's
> portsnap, same problem, same ports. Figured I ought to pipe up about it.
> Seems like a good ol' classic mystery.
>
On 10/20/13, Guillaume DOLLÉ wrote:
> Would it possible to update Petsc to version 3.4.3 ?
> Create a new port for slepc-3.4.3 (extension for petsc) could be also nice.
>
> Thank in advance.
Yes, both are on my todo list, as soon as I finish some other pending updates.
b.
__
Try again.
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Chad J. Milios wrote:
> TLDR; check lines prefixed with ? in the transcript below.
>
> Ran into this over a couple weeks ago. Checked again with last night's
> portsnap, same problem, same ports. Figured I ought to pipe up about it.
> Seems like a good
On 11/5/2013 14:54, Wolfgang Riegler wrote:
> building soundkonverter fails on 9.1 AMD64 with:
> /usr/local/include/taglib/mp4coverart.h:49: error: comma at end of enumerator
> list
> *** [CMakeFiles/soundkonverter.dir/metadata/tagengine.o] Error code 1
> [snip]
> Complete build log is attached.
TLDR; check lines prefixed with ? in the transcript below.
Ran into this over a couple weeks ago. Checked again with last night's
portsnap, same problem, same ports. Figured I ought to pipe up about it.
Seems like a good ol' classic mystery.
I don't know if it's just one instance of a general
Hi,
building soundkonverter fails on 9.1 AMD64 with:
/usr/local/include/taglib/mp4coverart.h:49: error: comma at end of enumerator
list
*** [CMakeFiles/soundkonverter.dir/metadata/tagengine.o] Error code 1
My options are:
---Begin OPTIONS List---
===> The following configuration options are ava
13 matches
Mail list logo
