Re: [HEADSUP] Staging, packaging and more

2013-10-03 Thread Erwin Lansing
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 08:32:59AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Please no devel packages. > > > > > > > > Seconded. > > > > > > What's wrong with devel packages? > > > > It complicates things for developers and custom software on > > FreeBSD. The typical situation that I se

Re: new DEFAULT_VERSIONS variable

2013-10-03 Thread Scot Hetzel
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 09:47:43AM -0400, Jerry wrote: >> I just saw this in UPDATING: >> >> 20131003: >> AFFECTS: users of lang/python* and ports >> AUTHOR: m...@freebsd.org >> >> T

Re: [HEADSUP] Staging, packaging and more

2013-10-03 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 08:18:33AM +0200, Marcus von Appen wrote: > On, Thu Oct 03, 2013, Fernando Apesteguía wrote: > > > El 03/10/2013 22:41, "Marcus von Appen" escribió: > > > > > > On, Thu Oct 03, 2013, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > > > > > > > On 10/03/13 07:17, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > > > > on

Re: [HEADSUP] Staging, packaging and more

2013-10-03 Thread Marcus von Appen
On, Thu Oct 03, 2013, Fernando Apesteguía wrote: > El 03/10/2013 22:41, "Marcus von Appen" escribió: > > > > On, Thu Oct 03, 2013, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > > > > > On 10/03/13 07:17, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > > > on 03/10/2013 11:48 Baptiste Daroussin said the following: > > > >> This also allows

Re: Explain staging

2013-10-03 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 08:21:19PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 10/03/2013 07:22 AM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > > On 10/03/2013 04:54 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > >> On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 10:58:56AM +0200, Alex Dupre wr

Re: Explain staging

2013-10-03 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/03/2013 07:22 AM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > On 10/03/2013 04:54 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 10:58:56AM +0200, Alex Dupre wrote: >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >>> >>> Baptiste Daroussin ha

Re: [HEADSUP] Staging, packaging and more

2013-10-03 Thread Fernando Apesteguía
El 03/10/2013 22:41, "Marcus von Appen" escribió: > > On, Thu Oct 03, 2013, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > > > On 10/03/13 07:17, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > > on 03/10/2013 11:48 Baptiste Daroussin said the following: > > >> This also allows lots of new features to come: > > >> - Allow to create sub-packa

Re: Explain staging

2013-10-03 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 03/10/2013 08:56, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > sorry, I still don't get it. > What is achived by staging? There are 4 main advantages: 1) You can build a port and then create a package from the stage directory without having to install it on your build system. You usually don't

Re: [HEADSUP] Staging, packaging and more

2013-10-03 Thread Marcus von Appen
On, Thu Oct 03, 2013, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > On 10/03/13 07:17, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > on 03/10/2013 11:48 Baptiste Daroussin said the following: > >> This also allows lots of new features to come: > >> - Allow to create sub-packages > >> - Allow to create debuginfo packages. > > I'd like to m

Re: [HEADSUP] Staging, packaging and more

2013-10-03 Thread Nathan Whitehorn
On 10/03/13 07:17, Andriy Gapon wrote: on 03/10/2013 11:48 Baptiste Daroussin said the following: This also allows lots of new features to come: - Allow to create sub-packages - Allow to create debuginfo packages. I'd like to mention a few other possibilities along the same lines: - doc package

Re: [HEADSUP] Staging, packaging and more

2013-10-03 Thread Eir Nym
Hi, I have question do we really need to build *doc packages every time or we can download prebuilded documentation for stable ports? There's two versions of documentation distributed separately for most ports: "doc-source" and "doc-builded". And there's very few situations when we really need bu

FreeBSD Port: unixODBC-2.3.1

2013-10-03 Thread djm
Bonjour, How to get free UNIXodbc for Firebird in Mac OS X 10.8.5 ? Thank you. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

ports/182357: Delete mail/squirrelmail-postfixadmin-plugin port

2013-10-03 Thread Darren Pilgrim
Would someone commit this please? Thanks ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

can't build xorg FreeBSD-9.1

2013-10-03 Thread joerg_surmann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi all, i have problems to build xorg-7.7 and xorg-apps-7.7 using clang. xrandr: /usr/local/lib/libXrandr.so: undefined reference to `_XEatDataWords' /usr/local/lib/libXrandr.so: undefined reference to `_XGetRequest' xdpyinfo: /usr/local/lib/lib

Re: [HEADSUP] Staging, packaging and more

2013-10-03 Thread Kevin Oberman
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 5:17 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 03/10/2013 11:48 Baptiste Daroussin said the following: > > This also allows lots of new features to come: > > - Allow to create sub-packages > > - Allow to create debuginfo packages. > > I'd like to mention a few other possibilities along

Re: [HEADSUP] Staging, packaging and more

2013-10-03 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 09:50:22AM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: > On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 5:17 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > > on 03/10/2013 11:48 Baptiste Daroussin said the following: > > > This also allows lots of new features to come: > > > - Allow to create sub-packages > > > - Allow to create d

graphics/ocropus fails to build on 9.2-R ports rev 329191

2013-10-03 Thread John
Hello freebsd-ports, # svn info /usr/ports Path: /usr/ports Working Copy Root Path: /usr/ports URL: https://svn0.eu.freebsd.org/ports/head Relative URL: ^/head Repository Root: https://svn0.eu.freebsd.org/ports Repository UUID: 35697150-7ecd-e111-bb59-0022644237b5 Revision: 329191 Node Kind: dire

Re: Chromium and HEAD

2013-10-03 Thread Lars Engels
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 10:10:24PM -0400, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote: > using a recent FreeBSD amd64 > FreeBSD NewBSD 10.0-ALPHA4 FreeBSD 10.0-ALPHA4 #0 r255942: Sun Sep 29 > 20:05:41 UTC 2013 > > > I am running chromium built with default options(clang33 from ports) > when you use the address bar to

Re: new DEFAULT_VERSIONS variable

2013-10-03 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 09:47:43AM -0400, Jerry wrote: > I just saw this in UPDATING: > > 20131003: > AFFECTS: users of lang/python* and ports > AUTHOR: m...@freebsd.org > > The default versions of lang/python* have been changed to support the > new D

new DEFAULT_VERSIONS variable

2013-10-03 Thread Jerry
I just saw this in UPDATING: 20131003: AFFECTS: users of lang/python* and ports AUTHOR: m...@freebsd.org The default versions of lang/python* have been changed to support the new DEFAULT_VERSIONS variable. PYTHON_DEFAULT_VERSION, PYTHON2_DEFAULT_VERSION and PYTHON3_DEFAULT_VERSION

Re: Chromium and HEAD

2013-10-03 Thread Gary Jennejohn
On Wed, 2 Oct 2013 22:10:24 -0400 "Sam Fourman Jr." wrote: > using a recent FreeBSD amd64 > FreeBSD NewBSD 10.0-ALPHA4 FreeBSD 10.0-ALPHA4 #0 r255942: Sun Sep 29 > 20:05:41 UTC 2013 > > > I am running chromium built with default options(clang33 from ports) > when you use the address bar to sear

Re: Explain staging

2013-10-03 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/03/2013 07:44 AM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > On 10/03/2013 07:32 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 07:22:35AM -0500, Stephen >> Montgomery-Smith wrote: >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >>> >>> On 10

Re: Explain staging

2013-10-03 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/03/2013 07:32 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 07:22:35AM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith > wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 10/03/2013 04:54 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >>> On Thu, Oct 03

Re: ports and NO_STAGE: portmaster leaves port-system in corrupt state

2013-10-03 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 02:17:34PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote: > When NO_STAGE=yes is missing in the port's Makefile, as it is for a > couple of ports like lang/perl5.16, then portmaster compiles, installs > and - corrupt the port-system, because it tries to "lstat" files it can > not find and ends

Re: Explain staging

2013-10-03 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 07:22:35AM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 10/03/2013 04:54 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 10:58:56AM +0200, Alex Dupre wrote: > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > >>

Re: Explain staging

2013-10-03 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/03/2013 04:54 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 10:58:56AM +0200, Alex Dupre wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >> >> Baptiste Daroussin ha scritto: >>> Here you are: >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/piper

Re: [HEADSUP] Staging, packaging and more

2013-10-03 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 03/10/2013 11:48 Baptiste Daroussin said the following: > This also allows lots of new features to come: > - Allow to create sub-packages > - Allow to create debuginfo packages. I'd like to mention a few other possibilities along the same lines: - doc packages - examples packages - "devel" pack

ports and NO_STAGE: portmaster leaves port-system in corrupt state

2013-10-03 Thread O. Hartmann
When NO_STAGE=yes is missing in the port's Makefile, as it is for a couple of ports like lang/perl5.16, then portmaster compiles, installs and - corrupt the port-system, because it tries to "lstat" files it can not find and ends up at the end of an unfinished installation. This leaves the entry in

Re: Explain staging

2013-10-03 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 10:58:56AM +0200, Alex Dupre wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Baptiste Daroussin ha scritto: > > Here you are: > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2013-October/086346.html > > I > > > was referring the the previous one: "[HEAD

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

2013-10-03 Thread portscout
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you

Re: Explain staging

2013-10-03 Thread Alex Dupre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Baptiste Daroussin ha scritto: > Here you are: > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2013-October/086346.html I > was referring the the previous one: "[HEADSUP] Stage support for the ports tree". Dunno if it had additional info or this

Re: Explain staging

2013-10-03 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 09:45:51AM +0200, Alex Dupre wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Baptiste Daroussin ha scritto: > > You should have received 2 mails from me with some details about > > staging: one called "[HEADSUP] Stage support for the ports tree" > > and on cal

[HEADSUP] Staging, packaging and more

2013-10-03 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
Hi all, I want to give to all porters infomations on the rationnale behind all the changes, to explain why some things has happened, the rationale behind what we still need to do to get the ports tree into a modern binary world. 1/ Staging You may has notice that staging has hit the ports tree,

Re: Explain staging

2013-10-03 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 09:45:51AM +0200, Alex Dupre wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Baptiste Daroussin ha scritto: > > You should have received 2 mails from me with some details about > > staging: one called "[HEADSUP] Stage support for the ports tree" > > and on cal

Re: Explain staging

2013-10-03 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
>Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 08:15:11 +0200 >From: Baptiste Daroussin >To: Stephen Montgomery-Smith >Subject: Re: Explain staging > >On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 10:44:32PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: >> I have not been following discussions recently. There is this new thing >> called staging.

Re: Explain staging

2013-10-03 Thread Alex Dupre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Baptiste Daroussin ha scritto: > You should have received 2 mails from me with some details about > staging: one called "[HEADSUP] Stage support for the ports tree" > and on called "Staging, packages and more" (very recent as of > yesterday) I think

Re: Explain staging

2013-10-03 Thread Kimmo Paasiala
> > From that stage a create can be directly created (even as a single user). or > the > stage can be sync into the filesystem. > You probably meant to write: "From that stage a *package* can be directly created" ;) It's easy to understand why this is so useful because the result of the compilat