Hi,
in bsd.port.mk there is a variable ACTUAL-PACKAGE-DEPENDS. To my
understanding it is broken with pkgng. The target where this is used is
still used if FORCE_PACKAGE is set.
Can someone confirm (I've only read the code)?
Previously this target was used to only record the explicit
dependencie
> The bootstrap code from i386-wine does the following:
> if [ -z "$__BINBOUNCE_BOOTSTRAP" ]
> then
> export LIBGL_DRIVERS_PATH=$LOCALBASE/lib32/dri
> if [ `uname -p` = i386 ]
> then
> export
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH="$LOCALBASE/lib32":"$LOCALBASE/lib32/wine":"$LD_LIBRARY_PATH"
> else
> ex
Hi,
Sorry for the cross-posting, but I'm not 100% sure where the problem
is, either with the Jenkins port, Java, or FreeBSD networking code..
I recently tried to install the devel/jenkins port
on two separate boxes:
(1) box 1 running FreeBSD-9-STABLE.
(2) box 2 running running FreeBSD-CURREN
On Monday, 26 August 2013 11:58:12 Thomas Mueller wrote:
> What are LD_LIBRARY_PATH and LD_32_LIBRARY_PATH supposed to be? I see
> neither of these environment variables defined.
The LD_(32_)LIBRARY_PATH variables are used by ld-elf(32).so.1 in resolving
the libraries.
> And what about PATH?
What are LD_LIBRARY_PATH and LD_32_LIBRARY_PATH supposed to be? I see neither
of these environment variables defined.
And what about PATH?
I am trying
#!/bin/sh
set
PATH=/compat/i386/usr/local/bin:/compat/i386/usr/local/sbin:/compat/i386/usr/bin:/compat/i386/usr/sbin:/compat/i386/bin:/compat
On 26/08/2013 18:59, Florian Smeets wrote:
> On 26.08.13 14:07, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
>> I don't know whether that's a general problem or just affects me,
>> but since Firefox 22 the xpi-* ports don't work for me any more.
>>
>
> This was broken for a brief period, it should be fixed though. You
On 26.08.13 14:07, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> I don't know whether that's a general problem or just affects me,
> but since Firefox 22 the xpi-* ports don't work for me any more.
>
This was broken for a brief period, it should be fixed though. You might
need to reinstall the xpis so that the correc
On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 16:24:26 +0200
Dimitry Andric wrote:
[...]
> > and furthermore, when I
> > thought the cups binary might be out of sync with the environment, I
> > tried to recompile the whole preint/cups installation, but this
> > fails now in a close to EPICAL way not finding "libiconv"
>
Hello.
I've been using portmaster successfully (and exclusively) for many
years. Previously I built a 9.2-PRERELEASE machine and ports using
portmaster-3.17.1 without PKG_NG:
portmaster -bwDH --delete-build-only --no-confirm ...
Recently I decided to rebuild everything from packages aft
On Aug 26, 2013, at 15:54, O. Hartmann wrote:
> Today I update a box to 10.0-CURRENT #0 r254896: Mon Aug 26 09:42:48
> CEST 2013 amd64. Bevor the update this morning, I ran a box with the
> sources from around last Friday and port print/cups was working fine
> so far.
>
> After building/installat
Today I update a box to 10.0-CURRENT #0 r254896: Mon Aug 26 09:42:48
CEST 2013 amd64. Bevor the update this morning, I ran a box with the
sources from around last Friday and port print/cups was working fine
so far.
After building/installation of world/kernel today as of r254896 the
cups daemon di
I don't know whether that's a general problem or just affects me,
but since Firefox 22 the xpi-* ports don't work for me any more.
I.e. they install just fine, but firefox doesn't pick them up.
I'm a huge fan of "everything goes into the package system" and I
am convinced plugin systems and autom
(Note: an HTML version of this report is available at
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?category=ports .)
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including
experimental development code and obsol
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you
2013/8/26 LuKreme :
> let's say there is a port I want to install, but I want to pass the compile
> -WITH-FOO-BAR, how do I tell postmaster I want to do that?
>
> --
>>You are forgetting something: the Nazgul are immune to non-magical weapons.
>
> "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indisting
15 matches
Mail list logo