Re: Ardour 3.x

What else needs to be tested? On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 12:16 AM, Super Bisquit wrote: > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/180171 > > Late reply. > Apologies. > > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 7:33 AM, Mark Felder wrote: > >> On Wed, 10 Jul 2013 17:43:50 -0500, Super Bisquit >> wrote:

Re: Would software "for non-commercial use" be acceptable as a port?

On 07/27/13 19:28, Peter Looyenga wrote: > Hi gang, > > I've been professionally using FreeBSD for quite some time now (my company > now uses 4 FreeBSD servers for web services) and during the implementation > period I've become quite fascinated with the ports system. And this evening > I suddenly

Re: Would software "for non-commercial use" be acceptable as a port?

On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 02:28:31AM +0200 I heard the voice of Peter Looyenga, and lo! it spake thus: > > Am I right to conclude that the product, with the non-commercial > clause I described above, could be a candidate for the ports > collection or would the restriction be a huge obstacle? There

Re: Would software "for non-commercial use" be acceptable as a port?

This is how DansGuardian works, and it's a part of the ports tree (www/dansguardian). The install points the user to the licensing page on the web. It's up to the user to decide if they're eligible for the non-com license. On 2013-07-27 5:37 PM, "Peter Looyenga" wrote: > Hi gang, > > I've been pr

Would software "for non-commercial use" be acceptable as a port?

Hi gang, I've been professionally using FreeBSD for quite some time now (my company now uses 4 FreeBSD servers for web services) and during the implementation period I've become quite fascinated with the ports system. And this evening I suddenly had an idea, but I'm not too sure how feasible this

Re: Freeocl build but doesn't work

Le Thu, 25 Jul 2013 11:36:23 +0200, Tijl Coosemans a écrit : > On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 09:17:56 +0200 lbartoletti wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I try to work with opencl via Freeocl but it doesn't work. > > > > When i build a test, it's ok (except with gcc46), but when i run > > it, it doesn't work : >

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

+-+ www/xpi-pentadactyl | 20130407| 20130727 +-+ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following

Re: [QAT] r323742: 4x leftovers, 36x success

On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Ports-QAT wrote: > - switch simple inline replacement from perl to sed > and remove where is no need in this anymore. > - trim Makefile header > : > > Port:www/p5-AMF-Perl 0.15_1 > > Buildgroup: 9.1-QAT/amd64 > Buildstatus: LEFTO