subj: very useful port sysutils/fsc
doesn't monitor some daemons - ejabberd, php-fpm and may be more
# fscadm enable php-fpm
Could not monitor service.
what is the reason?
original qa:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2013-February/249168.html
___
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2013-04-18 18:06:24 -0400, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Jung-uk Kim
> wrote:> On 2013-04-17 21:18:21 -0400, Jim Pazarena wrote:
On 9.1 amd, something has changed within my ports. This
compiled fine the very
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 12:55 PM, nemysis wrote:
> Hello
>
> Please test and review
>
> Kupfer
>
> Kupfer is an interface for quick and convenient access to applications
> and their documents.
>
> The most typical use is to find a specific application and launch it.
> We have tried to make Kupfer
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 2013-04-17 21:18:21 -0400, Jim Pazarena wrote:
>> On 9.1 amd, something has changed within my ports. This compiled
>> fine the very first time I installed 9.1, but a recent re-install
>> g
Jung-uk Kim wrote, On 2013-04-18 9:36 AM:
...
This problem was already discussed multiple times. [1][2]
Sorry, I saw no reference in either the fquestion or the
fports news groups.
Patch much appreciated, hope it can get committed soon.
You can download my patch from here:
http://people.fr
Le jeu 18 avr 13 à 22:55:18 +0200, Chris Rees
écrivait :
> HI all,
Hello,
> Who else wants to chop out loads of useless plist lines? :)
Well, these lines are not useless: it may be interesting to know if the
software has been translated in your language of choice.
Regards,
--
Th. Thomas.
p
HI all,
It drives me absolutely nuts keeping track of which .mo files get
installed to %D/share/locale/*/LC_MESSAGES, and they seem to have new
ones added all the time.
This means that what should be a simple version bump turns into
chasing up gettext directories etc; have a look at [1] for the f
Raynaud,
We've been in a ports lock down for a while but even so,
it doesn't pay to upgrade this port too often because there are often
bugs in releases that are fixed and a new tarball rolled with the same
version. The current version is from March 3rd so we're not that out of
date. We're out
On 17/04/2013 23:50, geoffroy desvernay wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Using poudriere to build some repositories here, I'm facing a (maybe
> simple) problem that I don't understand: while building
> converters/ruby-iconv with make works, it refuses to build in a
> poudriere jail:
>
> it fails at "extract"
Hello
Please test and review
Kupfer
Kupfer is an interface for quick and convenient access to applications
and their documents.
The most typical use is to find a specific application and launch it.
We have tried to make Kupfer easy to extend with plugins so that this
quick-access paradigm can b
Hi, as mentioned in ASSP 1.9x latest changelog, ASSP 1.98 any build are no
longer maintained and the only stable version is build 1.99 (13098) :
ASSP changelog assp.pl 1.99 (13106)
-There is no developer version 1.98 any longer.
-There is only a stable version starting with build 1.99 (13
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2013-04-17 21:18:21 -0400, Jim Pazarena wrote:
> On 9.1 amd, something has changed within my ports. This compiled
> fine the very first time I installed 9.1, but a recent re-install
> generates the following error(s) of failed references to lzma_*.
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you
On 18 Apr 2013 08:17, "Matthew Seaman"
wrote:
>
> On 18/04/2013 08:11, Beeblebrox wrote:
> > Lets say I create a list of NEW packages I want to install, and after
> > poudriere completed the build of this list, what is the easiest way to
then
> > install this list?
> > Ideally something like '# pk
On 18/04/2013 08:11, Beeblebrox wrote:
> Lets say I create a list of NEW packages I want to install, and after
> poudriere completed the build of this list, what is the easiest way to then
> install this list?
> Ideally something like '# pkg install < new.list' would just feed the list
> of package
On 18/04/2013 07:46, Diane Bruce wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 11:23:35PM -0700, Beeblebrox wrote:
>> I want a list of all installed packages in the form category/port. I will
>> feed the list to poudriere.
>> $ pkg info -ao > pkg.list
>> gives a list but needs cleaning - gcc-4.6.3: lang/gcc
>>
Thanks.
They both work nicely, but I'll use 'pkg query -a %o' since it's better
designed for the task
As a separate question:
Lets say I create a list of NEW packages I want to install, and after
poudriere completed the build of this list, what is the easiest way to then
install this list?
Ideally
17 matches
Mail list logo