Re: gettext or NLS changes ??

2012-10-17 Thread olli hauer
On 2012-10-17 22:51, Greg Larkin wrote: > On 10/17/12 3:49 PM, olli hauer wrote: >> Hi, > >> was there a change in forcing port builds with gettext or NLS in >> last time? > >> I have many failing ports in tinderbox with an error similar to the >> following message (haven't had this issue ~10 day

Re: gettext or NLS changes ??

2012-10-17 Thread Greg Larkin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/17/12 3:49 PM, olli hauer wrote: > Hi, > > was there a change in forcing port builds with gettext or NLS in > last time? > > I have many failing ports in tinderbox with an error similar to the > following message (haven't had this issue ~10 day

gettext or NLS changes ??

2012-10-17 Thread olli hauer
Hi, was there a change in forcing port builds with gettext or NLS in last time? I have many failing ports in tinderbox with an error similar to the following message (haven't had this issue ~10 days before) ==> /tb/a/builds/8.3-amd64-pkgng/tmp/make.log <== ===

FreeBSD Port: sge-6.2.2.1_3

2012-10-17 Thread Shaddox, William
I'm looking into the SGE for my work and handling the scheduling of our automation processes. The current setup works wonderfully but my boss and I are worried about the future since Oracle decided to not have an open source version. I was wondering, what are your thoughts about the future of

Re: svn commit: r305926 - head/ports-mgmt/poudriere

2012-10-17 Thread Adam McDougall
I upgraded poudriere to 2.2 and started a build using: poudriere bulk -D -f /root/pkg-webold -j 90amd64-webold I noticed by the lack of "deleting stale"... and the high number of packages it was going to build that it was intending to rebuild all packages in the list. I don't seem to have a fu

problem building Vuze

2012-10-17 Thread Robert Huff
On: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0: Tue Jul 24 08:55:46 EDT 2012 amd64 with openjdk6-b26, attempting to build last night's vuze update produces: ===> Cleaning for vuze-4.7.2.0 ===> Found saved configuration for vuze-4.7.0.0_1 ===> Extracting for vuze-4.7.2.0 => SHA256 Checksum OK f

Re: Portmaster/Portupgrade | pkg2ng

2012-10-17 Thread Bryan Drewery
On 10/17/2012 8:18 AM, Jim Trigg wrote: > On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 06:51:59PM -0500, Bryan Drewery wrote: >> On 10/16/2012 4:11 PM, Jos Chrispijn wrote: >>> Somewhat lost here; just read UPDATING in which is reported about an >>> additional function support of pkgng by portupgrade and portmaster: >>

Re: Portmaster/Portupgrade | pkg2ng

2012-10-17 Thread Jim Trigg
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 06:51:59PM -0500, Bryan Drewery wrote: > On 10/16/2012 4:11 PM, Jos Chrispijn wrote: > > Somewhat lost here; just read UPDATING in which is reported about an > > additional function support of pkgng by portupgrade and portmaster: > > > > PORTMASTER > > # make -C /usr/port

pkg install order dependency problem

2012-10-17 Thread Adam McDougall
Short version: If you make a pkg repo with poudriere that includes java/diablo-jdk16 and tell pkg to install it, it knows pkgconf is a dep of xproto but it installs it in the wrong order so it fails. diablo-jdk16 is not on pkgbeta so I cannot test with that repo. I realize there are other jdk choic

Re: something had broken in *.mk?

2012-10-17 Thread John Marino
On 10/17/2012 14:30, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: I don't know much about this, I just know that current is going to use bmake, and the only incompatibility I have spotted so far from our make to bmake is the :L becoming :tl and :U becoming :tu Once 8.3 and 9.0 are EOLed all version of freebsd mak

Re: something had broken in *.mk?

2012-10-17 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 02:25:38PM +0200, Michael Gmelin wrote: > On Wed, 17 Oct 2012 14:20:45 +0200 > Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 01:55:37PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 02:58:50PM +0400, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: > > > > John Marino

Re: something had broken in *.mk?

2012-10-17 Thread Michael Gmelin
On Wed, 17 Oct 2012 14:20:45 +0200 Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 01:55:37PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 02:58:50PM +0400, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: > > > John Marino wrote on 17.10.2012 14:52: > > > > You're building with bmake and not make.

Re: something had broken in *.mk?

2012-10-17 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 01:55:37PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 02:58:50PM +0400, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: > > John Marino wrote on 17.10.2012 14:52: > > > You're building with bmake and not make. > > > bmake uses :tu and :tl where make uses :U and :L, among other th

Re: something had broken in *.mk?

2012-10-17 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 02:58:50PM +0400, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: > John Marino wrote on 17.10.2012 14:52: > > You're building with bmake and not make. > > bmake uses :tu and :tl where make uses :U and :L, among other things. > > It's the :L modifier that's causing your errors. > > use the FreeB

Re: something had broken in *.mk?

2012-10-17 Thread John Marino
You're building with bmake and not make. bmake uses :tu and :tl where make uses :U and :L, among other things. It's the :L modifier that's causing your errors. use the FreeBSD version of make instead. John On 10/17/2012 09:59, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: Hi, I got this whenever check any port wi

Re: something had broken in *.mk?

2012-10-17 Thread Ruslan Mahmatkhanov
John Marino wrote on 17.10.2012 14:52: You're building with bmake and not make. bmake uses :tu and :tl where make uses :U and :L, among other things. It's the :L modifier that's causing your errors. use the FreeBSD version of make instead. John Yes, you are right. I just remember that I decided

Re: something had broken in *.mk?

2012-10-17 Thread John Marino
You're building with bmake and not make. bmake uses :tu and :tl where make uses :U and :L, among other things. It's the :L modifier that's causing your errors. use the FreeBSD version of make instead. John On 10/17/2012 09:59, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: Hi, I got this whenever check any port wi

Re: something had broken in *.mk?

2012-10-17 Thread Ruslan Mahmatkhanov
Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote on 17.10.2012 11:59: Hi, I got this whenever check any port with porlint -AC: root@smeshariki4:/usr/ports/devel/gitg # make install clean make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5118: warning: duplicate script for target "-depends" ignored make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.po

something had broken in *.mk?

2012-10-17 Thread Ruslan Mahmatkhanov
Hi, I got this whenever check any port with porlint -AC: """ [rm@smeshariki4 ~/py-pysha3]> portlint -AC make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: warning: duplicate script for target "-depends" ignored make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 5121: warning: using previous script for "-depends

Re: Quick status update on Squid 3.x ports

2012-10-17 Thread Любомир Григоров
Hello Thomas-Martin, Just wanted to check in if there is more info on Squid 3.2 or if you encountered a setback and are pushing the release further. Cheers and keep up the good work! -- Lyubomir Grigorov (bgalakazam) ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mail