On Sat, 6 Oct 2012 13:02:25 +0100
Chris Rees wrote:
> On 6 Oct 2012 12:27, "Michael Gmelin" wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, 6 Oct 2012 02:25:11 +0200
> > Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > There are still 1590 ports to be converted, more than 1600 has
> > > already been converte
I'm not using wine for some time, but from what I have experienced with him
theres no problem with the setup or install.
But... running games and some apps is pretty tricky:
You need to setup dlls and some requirements if needed for "every"
appidlication, program and game.
You can save some time ch
All the platforms that I run on, FreeBSD and PC-BSD, are all 64 bit. My son is
running 64 bit versions of Windoze 7. The machines have 8 GB and dual core
processors. (AMD Procs).
I seem to have to problems:
1) Installing and running wine correctly.
2) Getting the games to install and run c
On 10/06/2012 01:04, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> Concerning the bpm, I have removed more old things and useless tests from it
> that I have added!
I haven't done a line by line count, but even if you're right, that
doesn't help when the code you add is so inefficient. For example, you
still haven'
On 10/06/2012 00:15, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> Putting the WWW information into the port Makefile means that portindex
> only has to deal with about half as many files
I have the same response to you and Baptiste. I get what you're saying,
but what we gain by putting it in the Makefile does not make
Hello,
Perl versions 5.8 and 5.10 are considered EOS[1][2]. We are considering
perl5.8 and perl5.10 deprecated. They are scheduled for removal from the
ports
tree in four months (January 31, 2013).
You must upgrade your perl installation to newer versions (5.14 - default /
5.16) which are curre
On 6 October 2012, at 06:32, Eitan Adler wrote:
> On 6 October 2012 01:01, Doug Hardie wrote:
>> I just converted a port over to the new options structure and have a few
>> observations. I have not been involved in any of the discussions about the
>> structure as I didn't have the time to get
On 06-10-2012 17:39, Shane Ambler wrote:
> On 05/10/2012 23:41, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
>> On 02-10-2012 21:20, Shane Ambler wrote:
>>> I found a situation where gcc v4.2 compiles a i386 working binary and
>>> v4.6 doesn't. (Currently 4.7 and 4.8 fail to build this code) I have
>>> verified that this
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Peggy Wilkins wrote:
> I have two java ports installed on several of my systems:
>
> % cat /usr/local/etc/javavms
> /usr/local/diablo-jdk1.6.0/bin/java # DiabloCaffe1.6.0
> /usr/local/jdk1.6.0/bin/java # FREEBSD-JDK1.6.0
>
> It seems that when I update of one of th
On 05/10/2012 23:41, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
On 02-10-2012 21:20, Shane Ambler wrote:
I found a situation where gcc v4.2 compiles a i386 working binary and
v4.6 doesn't. (Currently 4.7 and 4.8 fail to build this code) I have
verified that this happens with 8.2/8.3/9.0 i386 systems. x86_64
versions
Wine itself or games under wine? What are the issues?
2012/10/6 Paul Pathiakis
> I have had a really difficult time getting wine to run on PC-BSD and
> FreeBSD. Nothing seems to work correctly. Is there a simple document to
> get this to work?
>
> If I can get it to work, there's probably a go
I have two java ports installed on several of my systems:
% cat /usr/local/etc/javavms
/usr/local/diablo-jdk1.6.0/bin/java # DiabloCaffe1.6.0
/usr/local/jdk1.6.0/bin/java # FREEBSD-JDK1.6.0
It seems that when I update of one of the versions, the version
executed by default turns out to be "the la
I have had a really difficult time getting wine to run on PC-BSD and FreeBSD.
Nothing seems to work correctly. Is there a simple document to get this to
work?
If I can get it to work, there's probably a good chance I can move the boy (and
others) over to PC-BSD.
P.
On 4 Oct 2012 20:17, "Jerry" wrote:
>
> On Thu, 4 Oct 2012 19:30:02 +0100
> Jamie Paul Griffin articulated:
>
> > Yes, it is a bit of a PITA isn't it. I wish flashplayer could be
> > replaced be something better that works on UNIX and all platforms for
> > that matter. Maybe HTML 5 will enable peo
On 6 October 2012 01:01, Doug Hardie wrote:
> I just converted a port over to the new options structure and have a few
> observations. I have not been involved in any of the discussions about the
> structure as I didn't have the time to get involved. However, a couple
> things came to mind du
On 6 October 2012 05:26, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> from Volodymyr Kostyrko :
>
>> I am still curious how one rebuilds and reinstalls a corrupted port
>> installation when backing up would not be desired. Maybe
>> t works" is not about flash plugin and never was.
>
>> 1. Each update fixes another ex
On 6 Oct 2012 12:27, "Michael Gmelin" wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, 6 Oct 2012 02:25:11 +0200
> Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > There are still 1590 ports to be converted, more than 1600 has
> > already been converted, please consider converting yours.
> >
> > Here is a list of ports to be c
Is there any chance to get portscout.org back? It hasn't been
working in quite a while, but portscout.cc does and this situation
hasn't change in the last 15 months (seems like miwi@ has problems
getting DNS service for the domain)
See also: http://miwi.bsdcrew.de/2011/07/portscout-is-back/
If no
On Sat, 6 Oct 2012 02:25:11 +0200
Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There are still 1590 ports to be converted, more than 1600 has
> already been converted, please consider converting yours.
>
> Here is a list of ports to be converted:
> http://wiki.freebsd.org/Ports/Options/ConvertingToOpt
Hi,
After some complications while submitting a patch to devel/py-ice
(getting a patch containing UTF-8 characters through the PR
system) the maintainer finally managed to apply the patch successfully,
but also decided to give up maintainership. Since I'm already managing
devel/ice and the two por
On 06/10/2012 03:01, Kent Stewart wrote:
> On Friday 05 October 2012 14:12:29 joaoBR wrote:
>> On 23/09/2012 18:36, Christopher Dawkins wrote:
>>> I am sorry to bring this to your attention: you all do a lot of work
>>> that considerably benefits me and many others.
>>>
>>>
>>> But I cannot compile
06.10.2012 13:39, Baptiste Daroussin пишет:
> On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 01:20:09PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:
>> 06.10.2012 12:13, Baptiste Daroussin пишет:
>>
>>> My first proposition for syntax was:
>>> .if !empty(PORT_OPTIONS:MFOO)
>>> .endif
>>>
>>> and
>>> .if empty(PORT_OPTIONS:MFOO)
>>> .en
On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 10:40:04AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 10:04:09AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 07:07:49PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> > > On 10/05/2012 07:05 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I want to p
On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 01:20:09PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> 06.10.2012 12:13, Baptiste Daroussin пишет:
>
> > My first proposition for syntax was:
> > .if !empty(PORT_OPTIONS:MFOO)
> > .endif
> >
> > and
> > .if empty(PORT_OPTIONS:MFOO)
> > .endif
>
> I'd prefer this one...
>
> > Lots of
from Volodymyr Kostyrko :
> I am still curious how one rebuilds and reinstalls a corrupted port
> installation when backing up would not be desired. Maybe
> t works" is not about flash plugin and never was.
> 1. Each update fixes another exploit. What about code quality? Would
> there be any pr
06.10.2012 12:13, Baptiste Daroussin пишет:
> My first proposition for syntax was:
> .if !empty(PORT_OPTIONS:MFOO)
> .endif
>
> and
> .if empty(PORT_OPTIONS:MFOO)
> .endif
I'd prefer this one...
> Lots of people stated they prefered the concise version:
> .if ${PORT_OPTIONS:MFOO}
> .endif
>
>
On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 10:04:09AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 07:07:49PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> > On 10/05/2012 07:05 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I want to propose and make the actual move of the WWW information from the
> > > pkg-descr
On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 10:01:45PM -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
> I just converted a port over to the new options structure and have a few
> observations. I have not been involved in any of the discussions about the
> structure as I didn't have the time to get involved. However, a couple
> things
On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 07:07:49PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 10/05/2012 07:05 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I want to propose and make the actual move of the WWW information from the
> > pkg-descr to the Makefile itself via a WWW variable.
> >
> > doing this will have multipl
On 06/10/2012 03:07, Doug Barton wrote:
>> * speedup make describe avoiding using grep to get the informations (make
>> >describe itself does not need speed but make index heavily use it and
>> > this
>> >will definitly benefit from speed up)
> Agreed, but there are other ways to speed u
30 matches
Mail list logo
