On 2012-09-05 08:37, John Marshall wrote:
> On Wed, 05 Sep 2012, 08:34 +0200, olli hauer wrote:
>> On 2012-09-05 08:27, John Marshall wrote:
>>> The previous version of Makefile.modules (r303550) doesn't include the
>>> server_config.c patch if IPv6 is disabled. I think that's the
>>> (conditional
On Wed, 05 Sep 2012, 08:34 +0200, olli hauer wrote:
> On 2012-09-05 08:27, John Marshall wrote:
> > The previous version of Makefile.modules (r303550) doesn't include the
> > server_config.c patch if IPv6 is disabled. I think that's the
> > (conditional) behaviour we need restored. If I remove th
On 2012-09-05 08:27, John Marshall wrote:
> On Wed, 05 Sep 2012, 08:10 +0200, Olli Hauer wrote:
>>
>> Can you test the following diff.
>>
>> Index: Makefile.modules
>> ===
>> --- Makefile.modules(revision 303680)
>> +++ Makefile.mo
On Wed, 05 Sep 2012, 08:10 +0200, Olli Hauer wrote:
>
> Can you test the following diff.
>
> Index: Makefile.modules
> ===
> --- Makefile.modules(revision 303680)
> +++ Makefile.modules(working copy)
> @@ -151,6 +151,7 @@
>
On 2012-09-05 08:03, John Marshall wrote:
> On Wed, 05 Sep 2012, 07:52 +0200, Olli Hauer wrote:
>>
>> Do you have IPv6 in the devel/apr1 port enabled?
>
> No.
>
> rwsrv08# make showconfig -C /usr/ports/devel/apr1 | grep IPV6
> IPV6=off: IPv6 protocol support
>
>> The apache buildfiles are c
On Wed, 05 Sep 2012, 07:52 +0200, Olli Hauer wrote:
>
> Do you have IPv6 in the devel/apr1 port enabled?
No.
rwsrv08# make showconfig -C /usr/ports/devel/apr1 | grep IPV6
IPV6=off: IPv6 protocol support
> The apache buildfiles are checking if APR_HAVE_IPV6 is present in the apr.h
> file (
On 2012-09-05 07:41, John Marshall wrote:
> On Wed, 05 Sep 2012, 07:27 +0200, Olli Hauer wrote:
>> On 2012-09-05 06:46, John Marshall wrote:
>>> The new options provided with 2.2.22_8 blow away existing IPv4/IPv6
>>> knobs and the port tries to build with IPv6 on a system which is IPv4
>>> only. T
On Wed, 05 Sep 2012, 07:27 +0200, Olli Hauer wrote:
> On 2012-09-05 06:46, John Marshall wrote:
> > The new options provided with 2.2.22_8 blow away existing IPv4/IPv6
> > knobs and the port tries to build with IPv6 on a system which is IPv4
> > only. The ending is not happy.
> >
> > config.c: In
On 2012-09-05 06:46, John Marshall wrote:
> The new options provided with 2.2.22_8 blow away existing IPv4/IPv6
> knobs and the port tries to build with IPv6 on a system which is IPv4
> only. The ending is not happy.
>
> config.c: In function 'init_server_config':
> config.c:1984: error: 'APR_INE
The new options provided with 2.2.22_8 blow away existing IPv4/IPv6
knobs and the port tries to build with IPv6 on a system which is IPv4
only. The ending is not happy.
config.c: In function 'init_server_config':
config.c:1984: error: 'APR_INET6' undeclared (first use in this function)
config.c:1
On 4 September 2012 17:50, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2012-09-04 17:53, Eitan Adler wrote:
>>
>> On 4 September 2012 05:26, Jake Smith wrote:
>
> ...
>
>>> It got me thinking, is there any reason why it would be a bad idea to
>>> build
>>> all my ports with debug symbols from now on?
>>
>>
>>> Ar
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 11:50:35PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2012-09-04 17:53, Eitan Adler wrote:
> >On 4 September 2012 05:26, Jake Smith wrote:
> ...
> >>It got me thinking, is there any reason why it would be a bad idea to
> >>build
> >>all my ports with debug symbols from now on?
> >
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 2012-09-04 22:49, olli hauer wrote:
> On 2012-09-04 22:29, Mike Jakubik wrote:
>> On Sun, 2012-09-02 at 10:15 +0200, Olli Hauer wrote:
>>> On 2012-09-02 01:48, Waitman Gobble wrote:
OK, I can do that... BUT those three options were 'already' selected
when i did
>> the test
On 2012-09-04 17:53, Eitan Adler wrote:
On 4 September 2012 05:26, Jake Smith wrote:
...
It got me thinking, is there any reason why it would be a bad idea to build
all my ports with debug symbols from now on?
Are there any performance hits
Yes. Code size grows and the flags may enable in
Le Thu, 30 Aug 2012 16:19:39 +0200,
Baptiste Daroussin a écrit :
Hello,
> After 2 years of development (first commit "Tue Sep 7 2010"), more
> than 2000 commits, 43 different contibutors. The pkgng team is proud
> to release pkg-1.0!
Hourrah! Many thanks.
Finally, how the nvidia-driver issue
On Tue, 2012-09-04 at 22:49 +0200, olli hauer wrote:
> If possible wait the next 40min. Im reworking at the moment the last APR only
> option
> about IPv4-mapping. IPv6 is an APR only option and v4-mapping should be off
> by default.
> (My tests build are running at the moment, I only have to ov
On 9/4/2012 3:29 PM, Mike Jakubik wrote:
> ===> apache22-worker-mpm-2.2.22_7 conflicts with installed package(s):
> apache-worker-2.2.22_5
>
> They install files into the same place.
> You may want to stop build with Ctrl + C.
You can just change the origin:
portmaster -o www
On 2012-09-04 22:29, Mike Jakubik wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-09-02 at 10:15 +0200, Olli Hauer wrote:
>> On 2012-09-02 01:48, Waitman Gobble wrote:
>>> OK, I can do that... BUT those three options were 'already' selected
>>> when i did
> the test...
>
> snip ...
>
>
> So
On Sun, 2012-09-02 at 10:15 +0200, Olli Hauer wrote:
> On 2012-09-02 01:48, Waitman Gobble wrote:
> >>> > > OK, I can do that... BUT those three options were 'already' selected
> >>> > > when i did
> >> > the test...
> >> >
> >> > snip ...
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > So it seems more and more the rep
INDEX build failed with errors:
Generating INDEX-7 - please wait.. Done.
Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: ghostscript8-nox11-8.71_10
Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: ghostscript9-nox11-9.05_5
Committers on the hook:
ak amdmi3 ashish cy dougb fjoe gerald hrs jase linimon marcus mm rea swills
vanilla
On 9/4/2012 12:41 PM, Warren Block wrote:
> dialogwrapper has now been committed to Tools/scripts in /usr/ports.
> Further testing is requested.
>
>
> What is dialogwrapper?
>
> dialogwrapper is a wrapper script for dialog(1) that works around some
> bugs and takes advantage of new features to m
On 9/4/2012 11:36 AM, Jeffrey Bouquet wrote:
> WITH_CCACHE_BUILD="yes" seems to be working... howsoever a few (2) times
> recently, portmaster would complete entirely (signaled by the 'yell' command
> as " && yell", but returning to that tty0 (xterm or...) the compiler will be
> still working o
Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 01:45:51AM -0400, AN wrote:
> I use the base compiler for world and most ports, I do not want to
> change at this time. So, my question is how can I tell
> Firefox-nightly to use clang? Is there an equivalent to
> USE_GCC=4.8+ for clang that I can put in the makefile? I want
On 9/4/2012 12:17 PM, Eitan Adler wrote:
> When MAKE_JOBS was originally introduced the intent was to flip the
> default after some amount of time and testing. Last this issue came up
> there were objections based on the 7.4 release, 8.2 release, gmake
> upgrade, and other wide scale changes.
>
>
dialogwrapper has now been committed to Tools/scripts in /usr/ports.
Further testing is requested.
What is dialogwrapper?
dialogwrapper is a wrapper script for dialog(1) that works around some
bugs and takes advantage of new features to make ports options setting
easier and better.
On Free
When MAKE_JOBS was originally introduced the intent was to flip the
default after some amount of time and testing. Last this issue came up
there were objections based on the 7.4 release, 8.2 release, gmake
upgrade, and other wide scale changes.
I think it is time to revisit this discussion.
My pr
I'm sorry, I can't make any sense of your message at all.
Can you show something along the lines of, "When I type X, Y happens"?
FWIW, there has been no change in portmaster's support of ccache.
Doug
--
I am only one, but I am one. I cannot do everything, but I can do
something. And
WITH_CCACHE_BUILD="yes" seems to be working... howsoever a few (2) times
recently, portmaster would complete entirely (signaled by the 'yell' command as
" && yell", but returning to that tty0 (xterm or...) the compiler will be still
working on the already-upgraded port
[1]
(easily stopped by a
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Florian Smeets wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we are looking for people using fusefs-ntfs. Bryan updated fusefs-ntfs
> to the latest version and i have an update for fusefs-libs.
>
> If you use fusefs-ntfs it would be great if you could download the
> patches at
>
> http://peopl
INDEX build failed with errors:
Generating INDEX-7 - please wait.. Done.
Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: ghostscript8-nox11-8.71_10
Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: ghostscript9-nox11-9.05_5
Committers on the hook:
ak cy dougb fjoe hrs linimon marcus mm rea swills vanilla wen zeising
Most recent
On 9/3/2012 10:45 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> These errors are a problem with bsd.port.mk. I've been meaning to write
> up a patch for a while now and get to bapt for testing. If he doesn't
> get to it first, I'll get one submitted soon.
I've filed ports/171326 to address.
The warnings are harmles
Quando a gente vota, escolhe os candidatos que irão nos representar na busca do
Bem Comum, que todos nós buscamos.Competência, seriedade, comportamento ético e
dignidade são qualidades que, embora raras, todos os políticos deviam ter. Mas
infelizmente nem todos têm.Por isso, vou votar num políti
[ please only choose one mailing list for now on, cross posting is discouraged ]
On 4 September 2012 05:26, Jake Smith wrote:
> Hi,
> It got me thinking, is there any reason why it would be a bad idea to build
> all my ports with debug symbols from now on?
> Are there any performance hits
Yes.
INDEX build failed with errors:
Generating INDEX-7 - please wait.. Done.
Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: ghostscript8-nox11-8.71_10
Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: ghostscript9-nox11-9.05_5
Committers on the hook:
ak dougb fjoe hrs linimon marcus mm rea vanilla wen zeising
Most recent CVS update
INDEX build failed with errors:
Generating INDEX-7 - please wait.. Done.
Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: ghostscript8-nox11-8.71_10
Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: ghostscript9-nox11-9.05_5
Committers on the hook:
ak dougb hrs linimon marcus mm wen zeising
Most recent CVS update was:
U MOVED
U a
Hi,
Recently a service kept crashing on a production box with a SIGSEGV 11.
So I rebuilt with debug symbols to analyse the core file, by adding
WITH_DEBUG=yes into my make.conf (gcc -g).
It got me thinking, is there any reason why it would be a bad idea to
build all my ports with debug symbo
Hi all,
To help people that use mariadb *and* permit different mariadb versions
in the ports tree, I propose this patch to bsd.database.mk with
MYSQL_PROV, _MYSQL_PROV, WANT_MYSQL_PROV and DEFAULT_MYSQL_PROV that
defaults to mysql to keep current behaviour.
This way, one can define MYSQL_PROV in
On 01-09-2012 21:40, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 01/09/2012 18:43, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
>> In this scenario the ports tree needs to keep support for older releases,
>> but that's a consequence of the fact that there's only one ports tree for
>> all releases. Somewhere in between the ports and the v
39 matches
Mail list logo
