The intention is to move from the following:
- 90% of our userbase use ports, 10% use packages
to
- 90% of our userbase use packages, 10% use ports
so that we can save people a dreadful amount of time and hassle.
That's really all that is happening here.
mcl
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Jason Helfman wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 02:47:34PM -0700, Kevin Oberman thus spake:
>
>> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Thomas Abthorpe
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> The FreeBSD ports tree will migrate from CVS to Subversion soon. The
>>> anticipated date for the mi
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 02:47:34PM -0700, Kevin Oberman thus spake:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Thomas Abthorpe wrote:
The FreeBSD ports tree will migrate from CVS to Subversion soon. The
anticipated date for the migration is July 14th. This will have no impact
for ports tree users as the
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Thomas Abthorpe wrote:
> The FreeBSD ports tree will migrate from CVS to Subversion soon. The
> anticipated date for the migration is July 14th. This will have no impact
> for ports tree users as there will be a SVN to CVS exporter.
>
> Please note that cvsup will
On 27 June 2012 20:17, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On 2012-Jun-26 14:41:32 -0700, Freddie Cash wrote:
>>On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Peter Jeremy wrote:
>>> but I hope the ports build system will not
>>> be thrown out as part of the pkgng migration.
>>
>>Where do you think packages would come from
On 2012-Jun-26 14:41:32 -0700, Freddie Cash wrote:
>On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Peter Jeremy wrote:
>> but I hope the ports build system will not
>> be thrown out as part of the pkgng migration.
>
>Where do you think packages would come from, if not built by the ports tree?
>;)
As long as
The FreeBSD ports tree will migrate from CVS to Subversion soon. The
anticipated date for the migration is July 14th. This will have no impact
for ports tree users as there will be a SVN to CVS exporter.
Please note that cvsup will still work after the migration. Nevertheless
c(v)sup is pretty dat
Hello,,,
I am trying to update my system, and it needs to build
gstreamer stuff (gstreamer, gstreamer-plugins)
but gstreamer.freedesktop.org seems down...
Someone please can point me to a mirror of freedesktop.org???
Google does not helped me...
Thanks
__
Hi,
If the installer is doing something like
cd /
ls
Check if usr exists and mkdir if it doesn't exist.
cd usr
Check if local exists and mkdir if it doesn't exist.
cd local
...
Then there's nothing we can do about it. This can't be disabled, it's inherent
in the way the linuxulator works.
Y
Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Hi,
I tried to install or update php53-extensions on few machines and I
always found a same bug.
My options are ignored and php53-extensions are installed with default
set of extensions.
It's because Makefile contains old
On 06/27/12 22:57, Boris Samorodov wrote:
27.06.2012 12:44, Benjamin пишет:
I created the directory /usr/local/quartus, but it still installed to
the directory under /compat/linux.
Does the directory under /compat/linux exist? If yes does removing
helps?
I have tried
rm -rf /compat/linux/
2012/6/27 Alex Dupre :
> Beat Gaetzi ha scritto:
>> Yes, to get SeaMonkey 2.10.1 running we need to change parts of
>> bsd.gecko.mk which affects other ports and this needs more testing.
>
> Is such path available somewhere?
Yes, but testing is still ongoing so use it at your own risk :)
http://t
Beat Gaetzi ha scritto:
> Yes, to get SeaMonkey 2.10.1 running we need to change parts of
> bsd.gecko.mk which affects other ports and this needs more testing.
Is such path available somewhere?
--
Alex Dupre
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
h
27.06.2012 12:44, Benjamin пишет:
I created the directory /usr/local/quartus, but it still installed to
the directory under /compat/linux.
Does the directory under /compat/linux exist? If yes does removing
helps?
--
WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam)
FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Pow
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 11:47:26AM +0200, Florent Peterschmitt wrote:
> On 26.06.2012 17:21, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 3:44 AM, Baptiste Daroussin
> > wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 10:34:00AM +0200, Marcus von Appen wrote:
> >>> Matthew Seaman:
> >>>
> On 26/0
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 08:50:48PM +0200, Marcus von Appen wrote:
> On, Tue Jun 26, 2012, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 3:44 AM, Baptiste Daroussin
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 10:34:00AM +0200, Marcus von Appen wrote:
> > >> Matthew Seaman :
> > >>
> > >> > O
On 26.06.2012 17:21, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 3:44 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 10:34:00AM +0200, Marcus von Appen wrote:
Matthew Seaman:
On 26/06/2012 08:26, Marcus von Appen wrote:
1. Ports are not modular
What do you mean by modular? if yo
On 06/27/12 04:13, Scot Hetzel wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 4:47 AM, Benjamin wrote:
Disclosure: I have posted this question on the forums too.
I am still attempting to port Quartus II design software to FreeBSD. I am
making progress, with the help of this list and others.
My latest problem
2012/6/27 Marco Alberoni :
> Hello, are there any problems for the release of the Seamonkey 2.10.1 port?
Yes, to get SeaMonkey 2.10.1 running we need to change parts of
bsd.gecko.mk which affects other ports and this needs more testing.
Beat
___
freebsd
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:31:40AM +0200, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
> On 06/26/12 11:03, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>
> > Yes, it will multiply the number of ports. By three is about right,
> > given that most ports will only have port-docs and port-examples
> > sub-ports. However, first of all, you ar
Hello, are there any problems for the release of the Seamonkey 2.10.1 port?
Yours sincerely
--
Marco Alberoni
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any m
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 07:09:55AM -0700, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
> Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 12:22:28AM +0200, Florent Peterschmitt
> > wrote:
> > > 2. Why do we have to put WITH_NEW_XORG in /etc/make.conf to
> > > get it ? Why not put this var in a port configura
Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 12:22:28AM +0200, Florent Peterschmitt
> wrote:
> > 2. Why do we have to put WITH_NEW_XORG in /etc/make.conf to
> > get it ? Why not put this var in a port configuration file
> > which will be read by all ports needing this var ?
>
> Because this
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 05:00:57PM +0200, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried to install or update php53-extensions on few machines and I
> always found a same bug.
> My options are ignored and php53-extensions are installed with default
> set of extensions.
> It's because Makefile contain
24 matches
Mail list logo
