INDEX build failed for 7.x

2011-07-20 Thread Erwin Lansing
INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-7 - please wait.. Done. make_index: ja-xgate-3.5pl3_3: no entry for /usr/ports/security/jce_policy14 Committers on the hook: bapt linimon lx maho stephen swills zi Most recent CVS update was: U databases/Makefile U databases/rubygem-sqlite3/Makefi

Re: portlint: DATADIR and NOEXAMPLEDOCS

2011-07-20 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
On 07/20/2011 07:31 PM, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: On 7/20/11 4:40 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: I have a couple of questions. 1) Why does portlint complain if a port is not DATADIR compliant? The warning is very conditional. It tries to provide information so one can make an informed d

INDEX build failed for 7.x

2011-07-20 Thread Erwin Lansing
INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-7 - please wait.. Done. make_index: rubygem-rails-app-installer-0.2.0_1: no entry for /usr/ports/databases/rubygem-sqlite3-ruby Committers on the hook: bapt lx swills zi Most recent CVS update was: U chinese/scim-tables/Makefile U chinese/scim-ta

Re: portlint: DATADIR and NOEXAMPLEDOCS

2011-07-20 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On 7/20/11 4:40 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > I have a couple of questions. > > 1) Why does portlint complain if a port is not DATADIR compliant? The warning is very conditional. It tries to provide information so one can make an informed decision as to whether or not they want to be DA

Perl_message_from_yesterday-SOLVED-probably

2011-07-20 Thread jsb.__
RE: 5.12.3 5.12.4 ( a followup ) Enboldened by the /pkgs_which/ recc., I compiled a list of perl-related ports, (site_perl/5.12.3 and perl5/5.12.3) upgraded perl, ran perl-after-upgrade then perl-after-upgrade -f (unsure which one worked). found two stray ports remained. Reinstalled those. D

portlint: DATADIR and NOEXAMPLEDOCS

2011-07-20 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
I have a couple of questions. 1) Why does portlint complain if a port is not DATADIR compliant? What was the rationale behind making ports DATADIR compliant, so that if one types "make install DATADIR=/somewhere_else" then what would be stored in /usr/local/share/port_name will now be in /som

Re: a) libgcrypt b) perl

2011-07-20 Thread Chip Camden
Quoth Andriy Gapon on Wednesday, 20 July 2011: > on 20/07/2011 03:04 jsb...@speakeasy.net said the following: > > for some reason perl-after-upgrade does little on these machines > > Just in case - have you read its man page and have you ever try to run > perl-after-upgrade -f ? Well, that explai

Re: french/aster ignores PYTHON_VERSION= 2.6 ?

2011-07-20 Thread Ruslan Mahmatkhanov
Anton Shterenlikht wrote on 20.07.2011 17:44: On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 04:55:59PM +0400, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: As far i understand PYTHON_VERSION hold value like 'python2.7', so you should correct this in your Makefile. Or just use USE_PYTHON = 2.6 No, PYTHON_VERSION seems to be overwrit

Re: french/aster ignores PYTHON_VERSION= 2.6 ?

2011-07-20 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 04:55:59PM +0400, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: > Anton Shterenlikht wrote on 20.07.2011 16:40: > >french/aster has in the Makefile: > > > >.if ${ARCH} == "amd64" > ># python 2.7 causes process runaway > >PYTHON_VERSION= 2.6 > >.endif > > > >I get the same on ia64, so I changed

Re: french/aster ignores PYTHON_VERSION= 2.6 ?

2011-07-20 Thread Ruslan Mahmatkhanov
Anton Shterenlikht wrote on 20.07.2011 16:40: french/aster has in the Makefile: .if ${ARCH} == "amd64" # python 2.7 causes process runaway PYTHON_VERSION= 2.6 .endif I get the same on ia64, so I changed it to: .if ${ARCH} == "amd64" || ${ARCH} == "ia64" # python 2.7 causes process runaway PYTH

french/aster ignores PYTHON_VERSION= 2.6 ?

2011-07-20 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
french/aster has in the Makefile: .if ${ARCH} == "amd64" # python 2.7 causes process runaway PYTHON_VERSION= 2.6 .endif I get the same on ia64, so I changed it to: .if ${ARCH} == "amd64" || ${ARCH} == "ia64" # python 2.7 causes process runaway PYTHON_VERSION= 2.6 .endif But still 2.7 is used:

Re: What about creating an office team

2011-07-20 Thread Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 2:48 AM, Chris Rees wrote: > > On 20 Jul 2011 07:36, "Maho NAKATA" wrote: > > > > From: Chris Rees > > Subject: Re: What about creating an office team > > Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 20:33:06 +0100 > > > > > On 19 July 2011 20:28, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk > wrote: > > >> On Tue

Re: a) libgcrypt b) perl

2011-07-20 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 20/07/2011 03:04 jsb...@speakeasy.net said the following: > for some reason perl-after-upgrade does little on these machines Just in case - have you read its man page and have you ever try to run perl-after-upgrade -f ? -- Andriy Gapon ___ freebsd-po

Re: a) libgcrypt b) perl

2011-07-20 Thread Matthias Andree
Am 20.07.2011 04:45, schrieb Doug Barton: > On 07/19/2011 17:04, jsb...@speakeasy.net wrote: >> >> >> Apologies for two subjects. > > Don't apologize, just don't do it. :) > >> Disheartened by the perl 5.12.3 5.12.4 bump; I've figured how to upgrade >> (for some reason perl-after-upgrade does lit