nspluginwrapper+openjdk6+linux-f10-flashplugin coredumps

I have a rather strange situation on a FreeBSD 8-stable/amd84 box where nspluginwrapper coredumps whilst processing npwrapper.libflashplayer.so if it sees IcedTeaPlugin.so first: server% nspluginwrapper -v -l List plugins in /usr/local/lib/browser_plugins Looking for plug

Re: 8-STABLE /usr/include/utmp.h and tmpx

On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Aryeh Friedman wrote: > Some time in the last 2 weeks (I am sure when) a commit caused many > ports that assume a "standard" utmp/utmp.x to break for example > x11-toolkits/vte produces: > > gnome-pty-helper.c:497: warning: passing argument 4 of 'pty_add' > discards

Re: 8-STABLE /usr/include/utmp.h and tmpx

On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 09:16:58PM -0400, Aryeh Friedman wrote: > No will do even though I don't think I have a complete enough list of > ports to make a proper report (if in fact it is a per port solution > vs. fixing base) I don't see any related commits to 8-STABLE, which commit are you refferi

Re: 8-STABLE /usr/include/utmp.h and tmpx

No will do even though I don't think I have a complete enough list of ports to make a proper report (if in fact it is a per port solution vs. fixing base) On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 9:09 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Aryeh Friedman > wrote: >> Some time in the last 2 w

8-STABLE /usr/include/utmp.h and tmpx

Some time in the last 2 weeks (I am sure when) a commit caused many ports that assume a "standard" utmp/utmp.x to break for example x11-toolkits/vte produces: gnome-pty-helper.c:497: warning: passing argument 4 of 'pty_add' discards qualifiers from pointer target type mv -f .deps/gnome-pty-helper.

Re: Fetch failed for java/eclipse

On 03/06/2011 20:46, Chris Rees wrote: On 3 Jun 2011 19:36, "David Demelier" mailto:demelier.da...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Hello, > > The java/eclipse port seems to be broken for a while now : > > ===> Giving up on fetching files: eclipse/com.jcraft.jsch_0.1.41.v200903070017.jar eclipse/ja

Re: Fetch failed for java/eclipse

On 3 Jun 2011 19:36, "David Demelier" wrote: > > Hello, > > The java/eclipse port seems to be broken for a while now : > > ===> Giving up on fetching files: eclipse/com.jcraft.jsch_0.1.41.v200903070017.jar eclipse/javax.servlet.jsp_2.0.0.v200806031607.jar eclipse/org.hamcrest.core_1.1.0.v20090501

Fetch failed for java/eclipse

Hello, The java/eclipse port seems to be broken for a while now : ===> Giving up on fetching files: eclipse/com.jcraft.jsch_0.1.41.v200903070017.jar eclipse/javax.servlet.jsp_2.0.0.v200806031607.jar eclipse/org.hamcrest.core_1.1.0.v20090501071000.jar Make sure the Makefile and distinfo file

install problem: devel/kdebindings4-python-pykde4

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, i've a brand new FreeBSD here and will install KDE4 from ports. When i try: portmaster devel/kdebindings4-python-pykde4 snip: - - -- Found Python executable: /usr/local/bin/python2.7 - - -- Found Python version: 2.7.1 - - -- Found Python li

Re: Fping with WITH_IPV6=YES

On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 05:57:44PM +0400, Pavel Timofeev wrote: > Is it normal that /usr/ports/net/fping doesn't work correct if you have > WITH_IPV6=YES in /etc/make.conf? Port's Makefile has the following comment: # IPv6 not enabled by default, as it does not work together with IPv4. and lookin

Fping with WITH_IPV6=YES

Is it normal that /usr/ports/net/fping doesn't work correct if you have WITH_IPV6=YES in /etc/make.conf? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-uns

Re: cvsup servers down

Peter Jeremy wrote: You might like to check out http://www.mavetju.org/unix/freebsd-mirrors/cvsup-stats-global.php As well as: Roger Marquis ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebs

Re: GPC 2006 (Pascal) -- deprecated or "expired"??

Am 03.06.2011 06:56, schrieb Rugxulo: > Hi, > > On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Peter Jeremy wrote: >> On 2011-Jun-01 17:23:37 -0500, Rugxulo wrote: >>> It seems somebody isn't very knowledgeable about GPC. :-( >> ... >>> the real deal: *BSD hates GPL, esp. GPLv3, >> >> Please stop spreading F

Re: GPC 2006 (Pascal) -- deprecated or "expired"??

Am 03.06.2011 09:59, schrieb Rugxulo: >> As stated in the commit message, gpc was removed because it is a dead >> project and no-one was interested in maintaining it. It's nothing to >> do with GPLv3 - there are many GPLv3-licensed ports. > > It's not dead, it still works, but it won't be update

Re: GPC 2006 (Pascal) -- deprecated or "expired"??

Hi, On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Rugxulo wrote: > > Seriously, what maintenance? All someone has to do is build it. Okay, > maybe I'm oversimplifying it, but it can't be much more than that. I > don't expect bugfixes or added features, just a working binary. Well, if it is that simple, why do

Re: ports/136321: x11-toolkits/linux-pango: please update linux based port of pango

Synopsis: x11-toolkits/linux-pango: please update linux based port of pango State-Changed-From-To: suspended->closed State-Changed-By: arundel State-Changed-When: Fri Jun 3 10:48:52 UTC 2011 State-Changed-Why: Fixed by the update to version 1.28.3 [1]. [1] http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/

Re: GPC 2006 (Pascal) -- deprecated or "expired"??

Hi, On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 1:56 AM, Peter Jeremy wrote: > On 2011-Jun-02 23:56:34 -0500, Rugxulo wrote: > >>Sorry, not trying to be rude here (honestly), but it is GPLv3, which >>clearly is not popular with *BSD. Please don't act like licenses don't >>matter. > > I'm not saying licenses don't ma