Re: Problem on current with lang/php5 only with current. 7.4 installs fine

2011-04-08 Thread Edwin L. Culp W.
2011/4/8 Gritsuk Anton : > Did you select option [X] APACHE - Build Apache module in lang/php5? > > try it and paste here your results. > ! ! ! ! ! ! ! P O P ! ! ! ! ! ! That is the sound of me poping my head out of my ass ;) Thanks, sooo much, Anton. Who knows when I would h

Re: Problem on current with lang/php5 only with current. 7.4 installs fine

2011-04-08 Thread Gritsuk Anton
Did you select option [X] APACHE - Build Apache module in lang/php5? try it and paste here your results. On 09.04.2011 03:34, eculp wrote: This is so weird that I'm sure I must be responsible but can't find it. Any and all suggestions appreciated. On 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #179: We

Problem on current with lang/php5 only with current. 7.4 installs fine

2011-04-08 Thread eculp
This is so weird that I'm sure I must be responsible but can't find it. Any and all suggestions appreciated. On 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #179: Wed Mar 23 04:46:15 CST 2011, I compile the php5 port, make deinstall && make reinstall - surprise, NO PHP I did get a warning on the make

Re: Harbour version.

2011-04-08 Thread Mikhail Tsatsenko
On 08.04.2011 18:21, michael green wrote: The port of Harbour is very out-of-date. Is there any chance that the current version (2.0) will be ported? Hi, Michael! I have submitted a PR containing a patch (ports/156282). You can apply a patch and test new version of the harbour port. -- Mikha

Re: Best way to uninstall X

2011-04-08 Thread Attos
I was being sarcastic about the rm -rf /* Sorry for any confusion caused. I agree with you. newfs is faster. I installed a new drive and I'm installing everything there. The old drive is being used as the backup and as I install packages I'm moving configuration and data files over to the new syste

Re: Best way to uninstall X

2011-04-08 Thread Ondřej Majerech
2011/4/7 Attos : > I think so. > I'll do back up and start from scratch. Then I'll be sure I have just what I > need. > Switching to single user mode, tar, and as Konstantin wrote: rm -rf /* > If you do want to go the wipe-all-and-start-from-scratch route, doing newfs /dev/ might be a better optio

Re: graphics/simpleviewer doesn't build on head(?)

2011-04-08 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 09:47:33AM -0500, Zhihao Yuan wrote: > On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 9:10 AM, Alexey Shuvaev wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 07:07:02AM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > >> I'd happily switch to anything at least as good as default viewer in > >> windoze xp, but have not seen any

Harbour version.

2011-04-08 Thread michael green
The port of Harbour is very out-of-date. Is there any chance that the current version (2.0) will be ported? Thanks for your attention, regards, Michael Green. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-p

lang/gpc expiring

2011-04-08 Thread Marco van de Voort
FYI Saw that this port expires in a few days. No comment on that, but please note that it is mentioned in the developers handbook in the "compilers" paragraph (2.3.3), which might need editing. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.fr

Re: graphics/simpleviewer doesn't build on head(?)

2011-04-08 Thread Zhihao Yuan
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 9:10 AM, Alexey Shuvaev wrote: > On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 07:07:02AM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 01:50:27AM -0500, Zhihao Yuan wrote: >> > Whatever... I don't like this image viewer. >> >> While this viewer is far from perfect, I find that it at

Re: graphics/simpleviewer doesn't build on head(?)

2011-04-08 Thread Alexey Shuvaev
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 07:07:02AM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 01:50:27AM -0500, Zhihao Yuan wrote: > > Whatever... I don't like this image viewer. > > While this viewer is far from perfect, I find that it at least works > (contrary to gliv which dumps core on me both

Re: Fuse and s3fs

2011-04-08 Thread Ivan Voras
On 08/04/2011 07:29, Joe Auty wrote: Hello, I'd really like to get the s3fs FUSE file systems to work in FreeBSD, but the most recent versions of s3fs (which I'm most interested in using) require FUSE 2.8.4 or higher, and the ports collection only includes 2.7.4. What would take to update the f

Re: graphics/simpleviewer doesn't build on head(?)

2011-04-08 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 05:48:10AM -0500, Zhihao Yuan wrote: > 2011/4/8 Alexey Dokuchaev : > > Done.  You might be interested to know that Debian has this package of > > version 1.17.0-20061110, which is newer than ours.  I didn't take liberty > > to update the port which I don't use however. > >

Re: graphics/simpleviewer doesn't build on head(?)

2011-04-08 Thread Zhihao Yuan
2011/4/8 Alexey Dokuchaev : > On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 03:03:20AM -0500, Zhihao Yuan wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 2:59 AM, Zhihao Yuan wrote: >> > 2011/4/8 Alexey Dokuchaev : >> >> I will clean up graphics/xli and set you as maintainer. >> > >> > Thanks. The original distfile source can be remo

Re: graphics/simpleviewer doesn't build on head(?)

2011-04-08 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 03:03:20AM -0500, Zhihao Yuan wrote: > On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 2:59 AM, Zhihao Yuan wrote: > > 2011/4/8 Alexey Dokuchaev : > >> I will clean up graphics/xli and set you as maintainer. > > > > Thanks. The original distfile source can be removed. Others looks fine. > > Oh. Bt

Re: Best way to uninstall X

2011-04-08 Thread Chris Rees
On 8 April 2011 09:11, Thomas Steen Rasmussen wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 07-04-2011 18:59, Attos wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> What is the best way to uninstall X and all the applications that >> run under X? >> >> Thanks in advance. >> > Hello, > > Nobody seems

Re: Best way to uninstall X

2011-04-08 Thread Thomas Steen Rasmussen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07-04-2011 18:59, Attos wrote: > Hello all, > > What is the best way to uninstall X and all the applications that > run under X? > > Thanks in advance. > Hello, Nobody seems to have mentioned the nice little utility called pkg_rmleaves You can fi

Re: graphics/simpleviewer doesn't build on head(?)

2011-04-08 Thread Zhihao Yuan
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 2:59 AM, Zhihao Yuan wrote: > 2011/4/8 Alexey Dokuchaev : >> On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 02:39:50AM -0500, Zhihao Yuan wrote: >>> 2011/4/8 Alexey Dokuchaev : >>> > Unfortunately, graphics/xli seems to be deprecated and scheduled for >>> > termination after 2011-05-01. Perhaps yo

Re: graphics/simpleviewer doesn't build on head(?)

2011-04-08 Thread Zhihao Yuan
2011/4/8 Alexey Dokuchaev : > On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 02:39:50AM -0500, Zhihao Yuan wrote: >> 2011/4/8 Alexey Dokuchaev : >> > Unfortunately, graphics/xli seems to be deprecated and scheduled for >> > termination after 2011-05-01. Perhaps you'd like to become new >> > maintainer? >> >> Yes. So far,

Re: graphics/simpleviewer doesn't build on head(?)

2011-04-08 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 02:39:50AM -0500, Zhihao Yuan wrote: > 2011/4/8 Alexey Dokuchaev : > > Unfortunately, graphics/xli seems to be deprecated and scheduled for > > termination after 2011-05-01. Perhaps you'd like to become new > > maintainer? > > Yes. So far, I only maintain new ports. How do

Re: graphics/simpleviewer doesn't build on head(?)

2011-04-08 Thread Alex Kozlov
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 07:07:02AM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 01:50:27AM -0500, Zhihao Yuan wrote: >> Whatever... I don't like this image viewer. > > While this viewer is far from perfect, I find that it at least works > (contrary to gliv which dumps core on me both n

Re: graphics/simpleviewer doesn't build on head(?)

2011-04-08 Thread Zhihao Yuan
2011/4/8 Alexey Dokuchaev : > On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 02:22:17AM -0500, Zhihao Yuan wrote: >> 2011/4/8 Alexey Dokuchaev : >> > On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 01:50:27AM -0500, Zhihao Yuan wrote: >> >> Whatever... I don't like this image viewer. >> > >> > I'd happily switch to anything at least as good as

Re: graphics/simpleviewer doesn't build on head(?)

2011-04-08 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 02:22:17AM -0500, Zhihao Yuan wrote: > 2011/4/8 Alexey Dokuchaev : > > On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 01:50:27AM -0500, Zhihao Yuan wrote: > >> Whatever... I don't like this image viewer. > > > > I'd happily switch to anything at least as good as default viewer in > > windoze xp, b

Re: Best way to uninstall X

2011-04-08 Thread Chris Rees
On 8 April 2011 08:00, Gritsuk Anton wrote: > Maybe freebsd has tool that provides opportunity (some option) to install > all packages from file with listing needy packages . For example: >  # command_with_option ~/file_with_needs_pkg > > Who knows this utility? http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/l

Re: graphics/simpleviewer doesn't build on head(?)

2011-04-08 Thread Zhihao Yuan
2011/4/8 Alexey Dokuchaev : > On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 01:50:27AM -0500, Zhihao Yuan wrote: >> Whatever... I don't like this image viewer. > > While this viewer is far from perfect, I find that it at least works > (contrary to gliv which dumps core on me both now and many years ago > when I first di

Re: Best way to uninstall X

2011-04-08 Thread Gritsuk Anton
oh, sorry i find the way to do it using # portmaster `cat ~/file_with_needs_pkg ` :-) On 08.04.2011 10:00, Gritsuk Anton wrote: Maybe freebsd has tool that provides opportunity (some option) to install all packages from file with listing needy packages . For example: # command_with_option ~/f

Re: graphics/simpleviewer doesn't build on head(?)

2011-04-08 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 01:50:27AM -0500, Zhihao Yuan wrote: > Whatever... I don't like this image viewer. While this viewer is far from perfect, I find that it at least works (contrary to gliv which dumps core on me both now and many years ago when I first discovered it) and performs scaling corr

Re: Best way to uninstall X

2011-04-08 Thread Gritsuk Anton
Maybe freebsd has tool that provides opportunity (some option) to install all packages from file with listing needy packages . For example: # command_with_option ~/file_with_needs_pkg Who knows this utility? On 07.04.2011 22:19, Olli Hauer wrote: If you plan the upgrade to 8.2 then you have t