On Sun 21 Nov 2010 at 22:01:28 PST Janky Jay, III wrote:
Almost anyone who is an only semi-serious port maintainer (meaning
they only have a select few number of ports to maintain and are only
trying to contribute/participate) knows that maybe this issue is due
to the porter's handbook. Speci
"Janky Jay, III" writes:
> On 11/21/2010 10:26 PM, Charlie Kester wrote:
>> On Sun 21 Nov 2010 at 20:09:23 PST Beech Rintoul wrote:
>>>
>>> That is correct, although it is possible to use a unified diff
>>> with the "-N" flag against a non existent source. The problem is
>>> too many contributors
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/21/2010 10:26 PM, Charlie Kester wrote:
> On Sun 21 Nov 2010 at 20:09:23 PST Beech Rintoul wrote:
>>
>> That is correct, although it is possible to use a unified diff
>> with the "-N" flag against a non existent source. The problem is
>> too many
On Sun 21 Nov 2010 at 20:09:23 PST Beech Rintoul wrote:
That is correct, although it is possible to use a unified diff with the "-N"
flag against a non existent source. The problem is too many contributors send
in update pr's in shar format which are a real PITA to deal with from our end.
You m
On Sunday 21 November 2010 15:12:08 Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 7:49 PM, Jonathan wrote:
> > On 11/20/2010 11:57 PM, Beech Rintoul wrote:
> >> Contribute approx. 50 pr's with patches that are consistently coded and
> >> prove
> >> to work (and in the right format) n
Doug Barton wrote:
> So does anyone have compiz working with gnome on FreeBSD?
I can't help with that directly, but have a related suggestion:
Based on what I've been reading on wine-users, it seems that wine
and compiz do not get along well together. When you get compiz
working, it might be w
Any ideas? I've tried the suggestions at
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/compiz-fusion/index.html and they
don't work for me.
Doug
Original Message
Subject: Suggestions on getting compiz working?
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 22:21:28 -0800
From: Doug Barton
Organization: h
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 7:49 PM, Jonathan wrote:
> On 11/20/2010 11:57 PM, Beech Rintoul wrote:
>
>> Contribute approx. 50 pr's with patches that are consistently coded and
>> prove
>> to work (and in the right format) no shar files please.
>>
>
> Does the Porter's Handbook need to be update
21.11.2010 23:53, Hanno Krusken пишет:
Gtk:ERROR:gtkrecentmanager.c:1942:get_icon_fallback: assertion failed: (retval
!= NULL)
basically the program is starting up, and the shortly comes up on the screen
but before the full
program is loaded it just cuts out and a core dump is left behind.
an
hi there,
running FreeBSD-8.1-releng-p1
after this mornings portupgrade, as described in the ports/UPDATEING file and
successfully
rebuild all the needed ports, the port "homebank-4.3 stops working.
even after rebuilding it with "portupgrade -f homebank" as well
I get this error:
Gtk:ERROR:gtk
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 13:25:13 +0100, Anders F Björklund wrote:
> Chris Rees wrote:
>
>>> For PackageKit's "app-install", I wanted to list all ports/packages
>>> that had a .desktop file (= an "app").
>
>> I may be misunderstanding you here, but you could just:
>>
>> [ch...@amnesiac]~% echo /usr/
On 11/20/2010 11:57 PM, Beech Rintoul wrote:
Contribute approx. 50 pr's with patches that are consistently coded and prove
to work (and in the right format) no shar files please.
Does the Porter's Handbook need to be updated then? It explicitly says
to use shar files to send ports in section
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 17:18:13 +
David Southwell wrote:
> > On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 15:17:21 +
> >
> > David Southwell wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 12:12:11 +
> > > >
> > > > David Southwell wrote:
> > > > > I posted about this failure some time ago but have had no useful
> > > >
On 11/21/10 4:00 AM, freebsd-ports-requ...@freebsd.org wrote:
deprecated because: has not been developed for 10 years
but is this a reason for deprecation if it still works?
Julian
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.o
> On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 15:17:21 +
>
> David Southwell wrote:
> > > On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 12:12:11 +
> > >
> > > David Southwell wrote:
> > > > I posted about this failure some time ago but have had no useful
> > > > response. I jhave also not heard from the maintainer so I thought
> > > >
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 15:17:21 +
David Southwell wrote:
> > On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 12:12:11 +
> >
> > David Southwell wrote:
> > > I posted about this failure some time ago but have had no useful
> > > response. I jhave also not heard from the maintainer so I thought
> > > another posting mi
> On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 12:12:11 +
>
> David Southwell wrote:
> > I posted about this failure some time ago but have had no useful
> > response. I jhave also not heard from the maintainer so I thought
> > another posting might be helpful. I understand others have a similar
> > problem.
> >
> >
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 12:12:11 +
David Southwell wrote:
> I posted about this failure some time ago but have had no useful response. I
> jhave also not heard from the maintainer so I thought another posting might
> be
> helpful. I understand others have a similar problem.
>
> Thanks in adva
Chris Rees wrote:
>> For PackageKit's "app-install", I wanted to list all
>> ports/packages that had a .desktop file (= an "app").
> I may be misunderstanding you here, but you could just:
>
> [ch...@amnesiac]~% echo /usr/ports/*/*/pkg-plist | xargs egrep
> '\.desktop$' | sed 's|/usr/ports/[a-zA
Hi
I posted about this failure some time ago but have had no useful response. I
jhave also not heard from the maintainer so I thought another posting might be
helpful. I understand others have a similar problem.
Thanks in advance for any assistance
David
gmake[6]: Leaving directory
`/usr/
On 21 November 2010 10:31, Anders F Björklund
wrote:
>
> For PackageKit's "app-install", I wanted to list all
> ports/packages that had a .desktop file (= an "app").
>
> This ended up in a large number of "false positives",
> since there is no list of the contents of each package.
> So the brute-
For PackageKit's "app-install", I wanted to list all
ports/packages that had a .desktop file (= an "app").
This ended up in a large number of "false positives",
since there is no list of the contents of each package.
So the brute-force method is to download *all* of them.
For Slackware, which al
Charlie Kester wrote:
> But I expect these two find & greps will detect the majority of filename
> conflicts. Unless someone has a better recommendation, I'll settle for
> less than perfect.
Using a MANIFEST file for packages works, if you have one available.
It's simply a file listing of the co
On 11/20/10 11:48, Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
> * Output from 'uname -a'.
>
> FreeBSD kreutzman.h.inter-sonic.com 7.3-STABLE FreeBSD 7.3-STABLE #0:
> Sun May 23 08:53:20 CEST 2010
> p...@kreutzman.h.inter-sonic.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/KREUTZMAN i386
>
>
> * Date/time stamp from www/firefox35/Ma
24 matches
Mail list logo
