I'll check it out, but I believe a correct patch is not quite as simple, it
needs some tuning when installing files as well, but I may be wrong.
--On 15 november 2010 17.44.27 -0800 Jason Helfman
wrote:
Hi,
I was hoping you would be able to consider implementing this PR
(ports/113707) in a
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:11 PM, Joseph Yeager wrote:
> The one I can remember is p5-Locale-gettext had an error "dont know how to
> make all." When I started using portupgrade, the only error I got was a
> list of ports that failed without explanations as to why they failed.
>
Try to reproduce
Hi,
I was hoping you would be able to consider implementing this PR
(ports/113707) in all applicable versions if possible?
This patch makes the postgresql_user a tunable variable.
As it stands now, we are maintaining this internally due to this issue,
and would rather release internal main
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Joseph Yeager wrote:
> Does anyone have any idea if there is a
> certain directory under the ports tree that I should clean up before trying
> to compile?
Without you posting the errors you got? No.
--
chs,
___
freebs
On 11/15/2010 02:51, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
It would be better if there was a repo for ports development on the
FreeBSD servers. There are several projects now that could use this
that I think this is warranted. It would increase their visibility and
lower the barrier to entry to attract contribu
On 14.11.2010 22:00, Kris Moore wrote:
> On Sun 14/11/10 3:44 PM , Anonymous wrote:
>> Kris Moore writes:
>>> On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 12:24:44PM -0700, Warren Block wrote:
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 14/11/2010 18:18 Warren Block said the following:
>> On Sat,
From: Kostik Belousov
Subject: Re: svn commit: r215309 - in head/sys: amd64/amd64 i386/i386 sys vm
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 23:37:49 +0200
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 12:20:37AM +0300, Anonymous wrote:
> > Konstantin Belousov writes:
> >
> > > Author: kib
> > > Date: Sun Nov 14 18:24:12 2010
> > >
Hi,
I'm in the process of creating "build" jails for each service that I
run. The idea is to install each service (apache, nginx, postfix, etc.)
under seperate jails and, when updates are available, run a portupgrade in
the jail, test it, package it, and then install that package on the
produ
on 15/11/2010 16:16 Gary Jennejohn said the following:
> 1.9.2 requires an update of MESA to a much more recent version than we
> currently have in ports. I tried the "modify Makefile and install"
> route yesterday and it failed because of that.
I have installed and been using newer Mesa for quit
On Monday, November 15, 2010 04:51:36 am Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> On Sunday 14 November 2010 23:02:42 Josh Paetzel wrote:
> > Area51 is quite cloneable it terms of infrastructure and what not. We
> > could very easily provide an SVN repo for experimental xoeg work.
>
> It would be better if there w
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 12:24:44 -0700 (MST)
Warren Block wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Nov 2010, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
> > on 14/11/2010 18:18 Warren Block said the following:
> >> On Sat, 13 Nov 2010, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >>
> >>> I agree, but I am not sure how in the ports land we do an application
> >>>
Hi,
since friday or so I have a problem with portupgrade:
# portupgrade -av
---> Session started at: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 13:22:41 +0100
---> Skipping 'bsdpan-SNMP-Extension-PassPersist-0.03' because it is
held by user (specify -f to force)
---> Session ended at: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 13:23:19 +0100 (c
(Note: an HTML version of this report is available at
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?category=ports .)
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including
experimental development code and obsol
On Sunday 14 November 2010 23:02:42 Josh Paetzel wrote:
> Area51 is quite cloneable it terms of infrastructure and what not. We
> could very easily provide an SVN repo for experimental xoeg work.
It would be better if there was a repo for ports development on the
FreeBSD servers. There are several
on 14/11/2010 21:06 Peter Jeremy said the following:
> On 2010-Nov-13 21:35:29 +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> I think that you refer to upgrades of the "Xorg bundle" as a whole.
>> Not sure if we've had any problems like that when upgrading between minor
>> versions of a single module, even such as
15 matches
Mail list logo
