Re: portsclean -CDD oddness

2010-11-08 Thread Doug Barton
On 11/03/2010 23:46, Doug Barton wrote: On 11/3/2010 9:59 PM, Jimmie James wrote: After doing a portupgrade, I've always run portsclean -CDD [for reference] -C Clean out all the working directories of the ports tree. (cf. WRKDIRPREFIX) -D Clean out all the distfiles that are not referenced by an

Re: [CFT] mplayer / mencoder port update

2010-11-08 Thread Anonymous
Thomas Zander writes: > On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 14:17, Anonymous wrote: > >> Can you include ariff's patch for VPC (Volume Per Channel)? > > I haven't used it myself yet, but it seems quite useful. I'll check it > out, thanks! > >> Also, did you miss -ac mpg123 with previous update intentionally?

Re: [CFT] mplayer / mencoder port update

2010-11-08 Thread Dmitry Marakasov
* Thomas Zander (thomas.e.zan...@googlemail.com) wrote: > I have prepared a recent mplayer snapshot for a possible update for > mplayer and mencoder ports. > You can find the tarball here: > > http://www.rrr.de/~riggs/mplayer/m20101106.tar.bz2 > > Since I had to tweak it on several occasions to

Re: [CFT] mplayer / mencoder port update

2010-11-08 Thread Thomas Zander
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 14:17, Anonymous wrote: > Can you include ariff's patch for VPC (Volume Per Channel)? I haven't used it myself yet, but it seems quite useful. I'll check it out, thanks! > Also, did you miss -ac mpg123 with previous update intentionally? You mean the laste update to hit

Re: [CFT] mplayer / mencoder port update

2010-11-08 Thread Thomas Zander
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 19:27, Stefan Ehmann wrote: > Built fine here. Unfortunately, x264 support in mencoder is broken. > > Apparently, mencoder wants X264_BUILD >= 99, but multimedia/x264 is at build > 98. True, x264-devel is already at 104, so in the near future this problem will be eliminate

Re: /pub or not /pub

2010-11-08 Thread Dominic Fandrey
On 08/11/2010 22:39, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: > On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Dominic Fandrey wrote: >> It has come to my attention that a lot of FTP mirrors have their >> FreeBSD data under /FreeBSD instead of /pub/FreeBSD. >> >> Which version is recommended and used to create PACKAGESITE from >

Re: /pub or not /pub

2010-11-08 Thread Torfinn Ingolfsen
IMHO, if a site claim to be a mirror, they should follow the structure of the original site. For FreeBSD ftp mirrors, that means /pub/FreeBSD etc. If they provide a /FreeBSD that one should be a link to /pub/FreeBSD and so on. On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Dominic Fandrey wrote: > It has come t

Re: devel/gdb Port

2010-11-08 Thread Anonymous
Steven Kreuzer writes: > With the help of jhb@, I have a port of gdb 7.1 that has been modified > to recognize freebsd threads. I would like to get this added to the > ports tree but I would like some feedback as to how it should be > added. > > Currently, the latest version of gdb in the ports t

Re: xorg-server 1.7.7

2010-11-08 Thread Gary Jennejohn
On Mon, 08 Nov 2010 19:22:22 +0200 Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 08/11/2010 19:17 Christof Schulze said the following: > > Hi, > > > Oh, forgot a need to simply bump port revisions of all xorg driver > ports. That's perhaps a little bit laborious, but doesn't require > any special skil

Re: firefox in 8.1-RELEASE: High CPU consumption?

2010-11-08 Thread Antonio Vieiro
Hi, I did upgrade to 3.6.12 and the problem seems to have disappeared. It's much better now. I'll keep an eye on firefox CPU consumption on standby, and will let you know if the problem arises again. Kind regards, Antonio 2010/11/5 Ruslan Mahmatkhanov : > > Hi! > > 05.11.2010 21:43, Antonio Vie

Re: xorg-server 1.7.7

2010-11-08 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 08/11/2010 19:17 Christof Schulze said the following: > Hi, > Oh, forgot a need to simply bump port revisions of all xorg driver ports. That's perhaps a little bit laborious, but doesn't require any special skills. Or did you have something else in mind? > more than just laboriou

Re: xorg-server 1.7.7

2010-11-08 Thread Christof Schulze
Hi, > >> Oh, forgot a need to simply bump port revisions of all xorg driver > >> ports. That's perhaps a little bit laborious, but doesn't require > >> any special skills. Or did you have something else in mind? more than just laborious. It will break at least the Intel driver as intel is now GEM

Now OK (Re: cvs commit: ports/chinese/cless Makefile)

2010-11-08 Thread QAT
chinese/cless, which was previously failing is OK after this commit. Thanks for fixing it! A description of the testing process can be found here: http://T32.TecNik93.com/FreeBSD/QA-Tindy/ Thanks for your work on making FreeBSD better, -- QAT - your friendly neighborhood Daemon, preparing a h

Re: xorg-server 1.7.7

2010-11-08 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 08/11/2010 17:52 Alexey Shuvaev said the following: > On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 05:11:41PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> on 08/11/2010 17:03 Alexey Shuvaev said the following: >>> On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 11:22:37AM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: Can we update xorg-server to 1.7.7, the latest

Re: xorg-server 1.7.7

2010-11-08 Thread Alexey Shuvaev
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 05:11:41PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 08/11/2010 17:03 Alexey Shuvaev said the following: > > On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 11:22:37AM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: > >> > >> Can we update xorg-server to 1.7.7, the latest version on 1.7 branch? > >> It looks like that would requ

Re: Proposed OPTIONS replacement

2010-11-08 Thread Eitan Adler
If there is interest in writing a BSDL libdialog I would be interested in working on such a project for the Google Summer of Code. I'm cross posting to -ports and -sysinstall because this part of the discussion started on -sysinstall. Please keep future discussion on -ports as that is what the focu

Re: xorg-server 1.7.7

2010-11-08 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 08/11/2010 17:03 Alexey Shuvaev said the following: > On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 11:22:37AM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> >> Can we update xorg-server to 1.7.7, the latest version on 1.7 branch? >> It looks like that would require only changing the version >> and regenerating the >> checksums. >> >

Now OK (Re: cvs commit: ports/japanese/ircII Makefile)

2010-11-08 Thread QAT
japanese/ircII, which was previously failing is OK after this commit. Thanks for fixing it! A description of the testing process can be found here: http://T32.TecNik93.com/FreeBSD/QA-Tindy/ Thanks for your work on making FreeBSD better, -- QAT - your friendly neighborhood Daemon, preparing a

Re: xorg-server 1.7.7

2010-11-08 Thread Alexey Shuvaev
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 11:22:37AM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > Can we update xorg-server to 1.7.7, the latest version on 1.7 branch? > It looks like that would require only changing the version > and regenerating the > checksums. > Seems to be not so trivial. Look at this thread: http://lists.

Current unassigned ports problem reports

2010-11-08 Thread FreeBSD bugmaster
(Note: an HTML version of this report is available at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?category=ports .) The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsol

Re: boost 1.44.0

2010-11-08 Thread Alexander Churanov
2010/11/8 Andriy Gapon : > > Just curious if anybody is working on updating boost in ports to 1.44.0. > Couldn't find a PR about that. Andriy, Boost ports will not be updated to 1.44. I am working on updating right to 1.45; release candidates are already available. Alexander Churanov, maintainer

Re: boost 1.44.0

2010-11-08 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 08/11/2010 12:03 Alexander Churanov said the following: > 2010/11/8 Andriy Gapon : >> >> Just curious if anybody is working on updating boost in ports to 1.44.0. >> Couldn't find a PR about that. > > Andriy, > > Boost ports will not be updated to 1.44. > I am working on updating right to 1.45;

xorg-server 1.7.7

2010-11-08 Thread Andriy Gapon
Can we update xorg-server to 1.7.7, the latest version on 1.7 branch? It looks like that would require only changing the version and regenerating the checksums. -- Andriy Gapon ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman

boost 1.44.0

2010-11-08 Thread Andriy Gapon
Just curious if anybody is working on updating boost in ports to 1.44.0. Couldn't find a PR about that. -- Andriy Gapon ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to

Re: [patch] Port lint shouldn't report that 'work' isn't in cvs

2010-11-08 Thread Sunpoet Hsieh
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 10:01 AM, Eitan Adler wrote: > portlint currently reports two conflicting messages when it finds a > "work" directory in a port > a) Make sure it isn't committed > b) It was not found in CVS > > This patch silences the second one > > --- portlint.old        2010-11-05 14:02: