PR 151443

2010-11-05 Thread Charlie Kester
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/151443 I hate to nag, but will one of the committers please give this PR some attention? It's been almost a month with no visible activity. If there's something more you need from me as the maintainer, please let me know. But I think this one is

Re: sane-backend 1.0.21 broke on 8.0?

2010-11-05 Thread Warren Block
On Fri, 5 Nov 2010, Jason Naughton wrote: It seems though that scanimage cannot determine the scanner as it has to be specified by the -d epson as if I issue: $ scanimage --format=tiff > foo2.tiff scanimage: no SANE devices found which is also the same result from $ scanimage -L No scanners

Re: firefox in 8.1-RELEASE: High CPU consumption?

2010-11-05 Thread Ruslan Mahmatkhanov
Hi! 05.11.2010 21:43, Antonio Vieiro пишет: Hi all, I'm observing what I think a high CPU usage with the "www/firefox" port in 8.1-RELEASE. Even with a blank page loaded (about:blank) I see CPU loads around 7-9%. I've done a truss on the browser and I see what appears to be a loop and some "

sane-backend 1.0.21 broke on 8.0?

2010-11-05 Thread Jason Naughton
Hi all, I have an epson perfection 1660 photo that worked beautiful under 6.0. I recently reinstalled a my laptop with 8.0: FreeBSD trooper.naughton.ca 8.1-STABLE FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE #0: Fri Oct 8 17:37:37 EDT 2010 r...@trooper.naughton.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 It seems that /d

sane-backend 1.0.21 broke on 8.0?

2010-11-05 Thread Jason Naughton
Hi All, I recently reinstalled my laptop with Freebsd 8.X from 6.X: FreeBSD trooper.naughton.ca 8.1-STABLE FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE #0: Fri Oct 8 17:37:37 EDT 2010 r...@trooper.naughton.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 Ever since I re-installed I haven't been able to work with my scanner (EP

firefox in 8.1-RELEASE: High CPU consumption?

2010-11-05 Thread Antonio Vieiro
Hi all, I'm observing what I think a high CPU usage with the "www/firefox" port in 8.1-RELEASE. Even with a blank page loaded (about:blank) I see CPU loads around 7-9%. I've done a truss on the browser and I see what appears to be a loop and some "timeout" and "resource temporarily unavailab

CURRENT && 10.1r85/install_flash_player_10_linux.tar.gz

2010-11-05 Thread Matthias Apitz
Hello, ports/www/linux-f10-flashplugin10 requires 10.1r85/install_flash_player_10_linux.tar.gz but the MASTER_SITES of the Makefile don't have this version and I can't find it in Internet either... how is this supposed to work? Thanks matthias -- Matthias Apitz t +49-89-61308 351 - f

Re: new port - different versions of the same file - advice needed

2010-11-05 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 09:53:47PM +0800, Sunpoet Hsieh wrote: > On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 6:26 PM, Anton Shterenlikht > wrote: > > I'm trying to make a port of Slatec numerical libraries: > > http://netlib.org/slatec/ > > > > This file contains the full sources: > > http://netlib.org/slatec/slatec_

Re: comms/scud no longer maintained

2010-11-05 Thread Rene Ladan
Op 05-11-2010 16:23, David Quattlebaum schreef: > I haven't touched the scud source code in 4 years. > > Would it be better to remove comms/scud or just remove me as the Maintainer? > d...@ is listed as the maintainer in the Makefile, is that your alias? If it still works, there is no real r

comms/scud no longer maintained

2010-11-05 Thread David Quattlebaum
I haven't touched the scud source code in 4 years. Would it be better to remove comms/scud or just remove me as the Maintainer? Thanks. David Q ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To uns

Re: new port - different versions of the same file - advice needed

2010-11-05 Thread Sunpoet Hsieh
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 6:26 PM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > I'm trying to make a port of Slatec numerical libraries: > http://netlib.org/slatec/ > > This file contains the full sources: > http://netlib.org/slatec/slatec_src.tgz > > However, according to Netlib FAQ: http://netlib.org/misc/faq.html#

Re: ports/148777: [New Port] sysutils/qjail: Utility to deploy large number of jails quickly

2010-11-05 Thread joeb
What is the holdup about adding this simple port to the port system? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: new port - different versions of the same file - advice needed

2010-11-05 Thread Frank J. Laszlo
Anton Shterenlikht wrote: What I've done for now is to create a tgz of the 3 *.f files above, and put it at http://eis.bris.ac.uk/~mexas/blasmach.tgz I then put in the Makefile MASTER_SITES= http://netlib.org/slatec/ \ http://eis.bris.ac.uk/~mexas/ DISTNAME= ${PORTNAME}

Re: new port - different versions of the same file - advice needed

2010-11-05 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 10:26:08AM +, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > I'm trying to make a port of Slatec numerical libraries: > http://netlib.org/slatec/ > > This file contains the full sources: > http://netlib.org/slatec/slatec_src.tgz > > However, according to Netlib FAQ: http://netlib.org/mis

new port - different versions of the same file - advice needed

2010-11-05 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
I'm trying to make a port of Slatec numerical libraries: http://netlib.org/slatec/ This file contains the full sources: http://netlib.org/slatec/slatec_src.tgz However, according to Netlib FAQ: http://netlib.org/misc/faq.html#2.17 , I've got to replace 3 files in this archive by newer versions: