Re: Correction of the Ports documentation

2010-10-21 Thread Sahil Tandon
[replying on-list for posterity] On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 10:51:28 +0200, Carsten Jensen wrote: > I followed the ports guide on freebsd.org perhaps you could get > someone to fix the documentation there if my package is wrong. > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/po

GIMP 2.4 - better ui usability

2010-10-21 Thread Tomek CEDRO
I am really sick of idiotic GIMP 2.6 interface changes that destroys my multi workspace work habits learned for over 10 years (mainly related with menu available in toolbar). They want it to become more photoshop alike. Maybe someone has similar feeling, so I thought maybe its not that bad idea to

Re: Problem (again) with portsnap5.FreeBSD.org?

2010-10-21 Thread Guido Falsi
On 10/21/10 18:17, Royce Williams wrote: On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 2:51 AM, RW wrote: On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 10:31:24 +0200 Guido Falsi wrote: I have noticed on the machines I use/administer a bias towards portsnap5. If you define a cache environment variable the random choice is seeded by tha

Re: Problem (again) with portsnap5.FreeBSD.org?

2010-10-21 Thread Royce Williams
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 2:51 AM, RW wrote: > On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 10:31:24 +0200 Guido Falsi wrote: > >> I have noticed on the machines I use/administer a bias towards >> portsnap5. > If you define a cache environment variable the random choice is seeded > by that to improve the caching. There ma

Re: FreeBSD Port: zabbix-server-1.8.3,2

2010-10-21 Thread Jim Riggs
On Oct 21, 2010, at 8:04 AM, Переклад Алексей wrote: > I have multiple problems with net-mgmt/zabbix-server port on FreeBSD 8.1. > First of all, it requires the netlibsnmp library version 1.6 while FreeBSD > 8.1 uses version 2.0. I repaired that by creating symlink “libnetsnmp.so.16” > to libne

Re: Problem (again) with portsnap5.FreeBSD.org?

2010-10-21 Thread RW
On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 10:31:24 +0200 Guido Falsi wrote: > I have noticed on the machines I use/administer a bias towards > portsnap5. > > I mean, all these machines are always choosing mirror number five. > > Some are behind squid proxies and using them for portsnap, so I think > this can be exp

INDEX now builds successfully on 6.x

2010-10-21 Thread Erwin Lansing
___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Problem (again) with portsnap5.FreeBSD.org?

2010-10-21 Thread Guido Falsi
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 01:02:47PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 09:53:24PM +0200, Barbara wrote: > > > On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 01:11:35 +0200 (CEST) > > > Barbara articulated: > > > > > >> $ date > > >> Wed Oct 20 01:11:10 CEST 2010 > > >> > > >> # portsnap fetch update >