Good evening,
I contacted the port maintainer Thursday evening.
All is fine, he already submitted an update the Tuesday.
See http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=151020
--
Sébastien Santoro aka Dereckson
http://www.dereckson.be/
-- Forwarded message --
From: Guido Falsi
On Fri 01 Oct 2010 at 23:42:30 PDT Chetan Shukla wrote:
Hi,
Could someone please outline the steps needed in porting a general
application from Linux to FreeBSD.
As others have already pointed out, there are no shortcuts to the
righthand side of the learning curve.
For most apps, the usual "co
Doug Barton wrote at 15:58 -0700 on Oct 3, 2010:
> Changing the list to have a real discussion about this.
>
> On 10/3/2010 3:49 PM, John Hein wrote:
> > I'll mention that
> > it has come in handy for me in the past. I put it into the category
> > of ident strings in binaries. It has a si
Changing the list to have a real discussion about this.
On 10/3/2010 3:49 PM, John Hein wrote:
I'll mention that
it has come in handy for me in the past. I put it into the category
of ident strings in binaries. It has a similar utility.
Because I find it useful in maintaining and using a port
Nope, no reason, my mistake! Thanks, I will fix that.
PAlle
--On 3 oktober 2010 23.28.42 +0100 Matthew Seaman
wrote:
Is there any reason why the 3 postgresql90 ports aren't mentioned in
${PORTSDIR}/databases/Makefile ? They seem to work perfectly well for
installing postgresql-9.0.0
Is there any reason why the 3 postgresql90 ports aren't mentioned in
${PORTSDIR}/databases/Makefile ? They seem to work perfectly well for
installing postgresql-9.0.0
Cheers,
Matthew
--
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard
On 10/02/2010 02:49, Ade Lovett wrote:
> editors/vim -- fully functional console-only (no X11)
> editors/vim-lite -- stripped down version (again, no X11, perhaps even
> linked static for use within embedded systems)
> editors/vim-gui -- take your pick. X11 is implied. athena/motif widg
* Andriy Gapon (a...@icyb.net.ua) wrote:
> > Gnash port was updated, sorry for delay and thanks for waiting!
>
> The following patch is required for compilation with gcc44+.
> It's definitely an upstream issue:
> --- libbase/tu_file.h.orig2010-10-01 16:39:16.419334667 +0300
> +++ libbase/tu_f
On 03/10/2010 12:54, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> Dominic Fandrey wrote:
>> On 03/10/2010 11:45, David DEMELIER wrote:
>>> 2010/10/3 Matthew Seaman:
>>> I don't want something complex, checkbox, textbox, radiobuttons is
>>> enough.
>>
>> Textbox is _very_ complex. Think of all the code you'd have to
>
On 03/10/2010 12:48, David DEMELIER wrote:
> 2010/10/3 Dominic Fandrey :
>> On 03/10/2010 12:29, David DEMELIER wrote:
>>> 2010/10/3 Dominic Fandrey :
On 03/10/2010 11:45, David DEMELIER wrote:
> 2010/10/3 Matthew Seaman :
> I don't want something complex, checkbox, textbox, radiobutto
2010/10/3 ajtiM :
> On Sunday 03 October 2010 05:40:33 David DEMELIER wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I can't build openoffice.org-3 anymore,
>>
>> readlicense_oo
>> need(s) to be rebuilt
>>
>> Reason(s):
>>
>> ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making
>> /usr/obj/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.o
>> rg-3/
On Sunday 03 October 2010 05:40:33 David DEMELIER wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I can't build openoffice.org-3 anymore,
>
> readlicense_oo
> need(s) to be rebuilt
>
> Reason(s):
>
> ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making
> /usr/obj/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.o
> rg-3/work/OOO320_m19/readlicense_
2010/10/3 Matthew Seaman :
> On 03/10/2010 10:45:01, David DEMELIER wrote:
>> 2010/10/3 Matthew Seaman :
>>> On 03/10/2010 09:22:46, David DEMELIER wrote:
> 3. OPTIONS are limited to only checkbox YES/NO settings.
>> Why can I not set PREFIX thru the OPTIONS framework and have it come
>
On 03/10/2010 10:45:01, David DEMELIER wrote:
> 2010/10/3 Matthew Seaman :
>> On 03/10/2010 09:22:46, David DEMELIER wrote:
3. OPTIONS are limited to only checkbox YES/NO settings.
> Why can I not set PREFIX thru the OPTIONS framework and have it come
> from /var/db/ports/${PORTNAME}/o
## David DEMELIER (demelier.da...@gmail.com):
> I can't build openoffice.org-3 anymore,
>
> readlicense_oo
> need(s) to be rebuilt
>
> Reason(s):
>
> ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making
> /usr/obj/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.o
> rg-3/work/OOO320_m19/readlicense_oo/
I've not yet
On Sun, 3 Oct 2010 12:40:33 +0200
David DEMELIER wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I can't build openoffice.org-3 anymore,
>
> readlicense_oo
> need(s) to be rebuilt
>
> Reason(s):
>
> ERROR: error 65280 occurred while
> making /usr/obj/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.o
> rg-3/work/OOO320_m19/readlicense
Dominic Fandrey wrote:
On 03/10/2010 11:45, David DEMELIER wrote:
2010/10/3 Matthew Seaman:
I don't want something complex, checkbox, textbox, radiobuttons is enough.
Textbox is _very_ complex. Think of all the code you'd have to
add to ports to check what was entered by the user.
At the very
2010/10/3 Dominic Fandrey :
> On 03/10/2010 12:29, David DEMELIER wrote:
>> 2010/10/3 Dominic Fandrey :
>>> On 03/10/2010 11:45, David DEMELIER wrote:
2010/10/3 Matthew Seaman :
I don't want something complex, checkbox, textbox, radiobuttons is enough.
>>>
>>> Textbox is _very_ complex. T
Hi,
I can't build openoffice.org-3 anymore,
readlicense_oo
need(s) to be rebuilt
Reason(s):
ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making /usr/obj/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.o
rg-3/work/OOO320_m19/readlicense_oo/
Attention: if you build and deliver the above module(s) you may prolongue yo
On 03/10/2010 12:29, David DEMELIER wrote:
> 2010/10/3 Dominic Fandrey :
>> On 03/10/2010 11:45, David DEMELIER wrote:
>>> 2010/10/3 Matthew Seaman :
>>> I don't want something complex, checkbox, textbox, radiobuttons is enough.
>>
>> Textbox is _very_ complex. Think of all the code you'd have to
>
2010/10/3 Dominic Fandrey :
> On 03/10/2010 11:45, David DEMELIER wrote:
>> 2010/10/3 Matthew Seaman :
>> I don't want something complex, checkbox, textbox, radiobuttons is enough.
>
> Textbox is _very_ complex. Think of all the code you'd have to
> add to ports to check what was entered by the use
On 03/10/2010 11:45, David DEMELIER wrote:
> 2010/10/3 Matthew Seaman :
> I don't want something complex, checkbox, textbox, radiobuttons is enough.
Textbox is _very_ complex. Think of all the code you'd have to
add to ports to check what was entered by the user.
At the very least you have to veri
2010/10/3 Matthew Seaman :
> On 03/10/2010 09:22:46, David DEMELIER wrote:
>>> 3. OPTIONS are limited to only checkbox YES/NO settings.
>>> > Why can I not set PREFIX thru the OPTIONS framework and have it come
>>> > from /var/db/ports/${PORTNAME}/options on the 2nd and later builds?
>>> > Even the
hello, i have built the swftools port but from the make/install
configure it does not seem to find Python.h so when i run:
$ python -c 'import gfx'
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in
ImportError: No module named gfx
how do i enable this?
thanks
norman
--
˙uʍop ǝpısdn p,
On 03/10/2010 09:22:46, David DEMELIER wrote:
>> 3. OPTIONS are limited to only checkbox YES/NO settings.
>> > Why can I not set PREFIX thru the OPTIONS framework and have it come
>> > from /var/db/ports/${PORTNAME}/options on the 2nd and later builds?
>> > Even the boolean NOPORTDOCS isn't availab
2010/10/2 David O'Brien :
> On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 10:24:59AM +0200, David DEMELIER wrote:
>> What is "sufficiently clean" ? I wonder what is not clean in the
>> options framework, so please tell me then we still can clean it?
>
> When the Ports Collection was invented, ports maintainers were to
>
26 matches
Mail list logo
