On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 12:44:39AM +0400, Anonymous wrote:
> Greg Lewis writes:
> > I would argue that overriding a private variable is a hack (other ports
> > doing it doesn't make it not a hack).
>
> You could've spoke up in ports/148754 about your concern in order for
> portmgr@ to notice. The
Greg Lewis writes:
> I would argue that overriding a private variable is a hack (other ports
> doing it doesn't make it not a hack).
You could've spoke up in ports/148754 about your concern in order for
portmgr@ to notice. The PR strived to be less intrusive than divorcing
build jobs from make j
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 02:28:02PM +0200, David Naylor wrote:
> On Friday 20 August 2010 17:12:42 Anonymous wrote:
> > Anonymous writes:
> > > David Naylor writes:
> > >>> %%
> > >>> Index: java/openjdk6/Makefile
> > >>>
> > >>> @@ -266,3 +267,6 @@ post-install:
> > >>> @${CAT} ${PKGMESS
On 8/27/10 3:04 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
> Hello Kostik,
>
> On 8/27/10 2:58 PM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
>>> Of course. The new backtrace is here: http://gist.github.com/553734
>>
>> I suspect that this was fixed in r210796/HEAD and r211138/RELENG_8.
>>
>
> I will check this out on a test machine.
On Friday 20 August 2010 17:12:42 Anonymous wrote:
> Anonymous writes:
> > David Naylor writes:
> >>> %%
> >>> Index: java/openjdk6/Makefile
> >>>
> >>> @@ -266,3 +267,6 @@ post-install:
> >>> @${CAT} ${PKGMESSAGE}
> >>>
> >>> .include
> >>>
> >>> +
> >>> +# XXX: use `?=' in bsd.port.mk
>
Dear porters,
This is just a reminder to please periodically check the list of
unbuildable ports at http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/ .
A list by MAINTAINER is
http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/errorlogs/
so you can easily check the status of ports that you maintain. In
addition, the li
