Re: DEPRECATE and a master/slave port

2010-08-13 Thread Wesley Shields
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 01:25:09PM -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote: > I want to DEPRECATE security/barnyard. It's a master port. The slave > is security/barnyard-sguil. Is it sufficient to DEPRECATE and EXPIRE > the master? Or do I need to do that to the slave as well? Master should be enough. -- W

DEPRECATE and a master/slave port

2010-08-13 Thread Paul Schmehl
I want to DEPRECATE security/barnyard. It's a master port. The slave is security/barnyard-sguil. Is it sufficient to DEPRECATE and EXPIRE the master? Or do I need to do that to the slave as well? -- Paul Schmehl, Senior Infosec Analyst As if it wasn't already obvious, my opinions are my own

Re: i keep *trying* to move from portupgrade to portmaster

2010-08-13 Thread Torfinn Ingolfsen
Hi, On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Freddie Cash wrote: > > However, as a user of portmaster, I would like to say that just > because portupgrade (or portmanager, or port-tool-of-the-month) has a > specific feature, doesn't mean it absolutely needs to be added to > portmaster. > Agreed. > Pe

Re: i keep *trying* to move from portupgrade to portmaster

2010-08-13 Thread Freddie Cash
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Mike Jakubik wrote: > On 8/12/2010 5:32 PM, Doug Barton wrote: >> >> On Thu, 12 Aug 2010, Mike Jakubik wrote: >> >>> I tried portmaster for myself and im wondering how to get the >>> functionality of "portupgrade lib\*", meaning update all libraries >>> that need u

Re: i keep *trying* to move from portupgrade to portmaster

2010-08-13 Thread Mike Jakubik
On 8/12/2010 5:32 PM, Doug Barton wrote: On Thu, 12 Aug 2010, Mike Jakubik wrote: I tried portmaster for myself and im wondering how to get the functionality of "portupgrade lib\*", meaning update all libraries that need updating. With "portmaster lib\*" it tries to update and rebuild all libra

Re: i keep *trying* to move from portupgrade to portmaster

2010-08-13 Thread Eduardo
Just curious, is it really true that portupgrade is "abandonware" ? I think I have seen some updates to it on the ports tree in the last six months ... thanks, -Ed. On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 4:24 AM, Sandra Kachelmann wrote: > I've been using ports-mgmt/portupgrade pretty much ever since it > star

[solved] [portmaster] failed update

2010-08-13 Thread Boris Samorodov
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 02:04:56 -0700 Doug Barton wrote: > On 08/13/2010 02:03, Boris Samorodov wrote: > > Yes, I do define it at /etc/make.conf: > > - > > # grep PORTSDIR /etc/make.conf > > PORTSDIR= /m/ports > Ok, there's your problem. Remove that and you're good to go. The prob

Re: [portmaster] failed update

2010-08-13 Thread Doug Barton
On 08/13/2010 02:03, Boris Samorodov wrote: > Yes, I do define it at /etc/make.conf: > - > # grep PORTSDIR /etc/make.conf > PORTSDIR= /m/ports Ok, there's your problem. Remove that and you're good to go. -- Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with

Re: [portmaster] failed update

2010-08-13 Thread Boris Samorodov
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 13:00:49 +0400 Boris Samorodov wrote: > On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 01:51:07 -0700 Doug Barton wrote: > > On 08/13/2010 00:26, Boris Samorodov wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > > > - > > > # portmaster --version > > > > > > ===>>> Version 3.0 > > > # portmaster tmux > > > > > > ===>>>

Re: [portmaster] failed update

2010-08-13 Thread Boris Samorodov
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 01:51:07 -0700 Doug Barton wrote: > On 08/13/2010 00:26, Boris Samorodov wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > - > > # portmaster --version > > > > ===>>> Version 3.0 > > # portmaster tmux > > > > ===>>> Currently installed version: tmux-1.2_1 > > ===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/s

Re: [portmaster] failed update

2010-08-13 Thread Doug Barton
On 08/13/2010 00:26, Boris Samorodov wrote: > Hi All, > > - > # portmaster --version > > ===>>> Version 3.0 > # portmaster tmux > > ===>>> Currently installed version: tmux-1.2_1 > ===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/sysutils/tmux > > ===>>> Gathering distinfo list for installed ports > > ==

Re: xz memory limit override

2010-08-13 Thread Matthias Andree
Am 12.08.2010, 15:11 Uhr, schrieb Matthias Andree: Warren Block wrote on 2010-08-01: xz(1) has a built-in protective notion about limiting memory usage that prevents port building on relatively low-memory computers. Users have experienced this in the wild[1]. Matthias Andree pointed out[

[portmaster] failed update

2010-08-13 Thread Boris Samorodov
Hi All, - # portmaster --version ===>>> Version 3.0 # portmaster tmux ===>>> Currently installed version: tmux-1.2_1 ===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/sysutils/tmux ===>>> Gathering distinfo list for installed ports ===>>> Launching 'make checksum' for sysutils/tmux in background ===>>> Ga