Re: lang/perl5.12 segfault (amd64 - 8-STABLE)

2010-07-18 Thread Christopher Key
cj...@cam.ac.uk wrote: > Someone who understands the perl threading internals needs to figure > this out. > > Simple solution, there was a missing -lpthread, patch available from: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/148648 For some reason, linking binaries without -lpthread succe

Re: [new port] usage of shar command

2010-07-18 Thread Doug Barton
On 07/18/10 19:47, Joe wrote: > There will always be first timers. We all started somewhere. :) Doug -- Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with a domain name makeover!http://SupersetSolutions.com/ Computers are useless. They can only give you answ

Re: [new port] usage of shar command

2010-07-18 Thread Joe
Janne Snabb wrote: On Mon, 19 Jul 2010, Joe wrote: This needs to be in the handbook. How is anybody going to know that the `find port_dir` is suppose to be enclosed by [`backticks`]. I has to be said in words not just a printed example. I would have assumed that anyone who submits a port wou

Re: [new port] usage of shar command

2010-07-18 Thread Janne Snabb
On Mon, 19 Jul 2010, Joe wrote: This needs to be in the handbook. How is anybody going to know that the `find port_dir` is suppose to be enclosed by [`backticks`]. I has to be said in words not just a printed example. I would have assumed that anyone who submits a port would be familiar with

Re: [new port] usage of shar command

2010-07-18 Thread Doug Barton
On 07/18/10 02:56, Joe wrote: > I can not figure out just what the author was trying to say with > "output of shar `find port_dir`" I just committed what is hopefully an improvement to the documentation for that. It should hit the web site in a couple hours. FWIW, I saw your followup about mentio

bsd.perl.mk (Was: Re: _PERL_REFACTORING_COMPLETE lang/perl5.12 Mk/bsd.perl.mk)

2010-07-18 Thread Doug Barton
On 07/18/10 15:38, Mark Linimon wrote: > The intention of bsd.perl.mk was to eventually allow a bunch of code > to be pulled out of bsd.port.mk, and to have bsd.perl.mk only included > conditionally, on the theory that it will speed up INDEX building > somewhat. (I have not tested for speedup). S

Re: [new port] usage of shar command

2010-07-18 Thread Joe
Chip Camden wrote: Quoth Joe on Monday, 19 July 2010: Matthew Seaman wrote: On 18/07/2010 10:56:42, Joe wrote: After getting my port ready for submitting to the ports system, I read the above section from the porters handbook and come to a show stopper. I can not figure out just what the aut

Re: net-mgmt/netdisco 1.0 update

2010-07-18 Thread Sevan / Venture37
ammended patch for netdisco.crontab, use this patch instead of the one included in the previous diff. Sevan / Venture37 Index: files/patch-netdisco.crontab === RCS file: /home/ncvs/ports/net-mgmt/netdisco/files/patch-netdisco.cronta

Re: [new port] usage of shar command

2010-07-18 Thread Chip Camden
Quoth Joe on Monday, 19 July 2010: > Matthew Seaman wrote: > >On 18/07/2010 10:56:42, Joe wrote: > > > >>After getting my port ready for submitting to the ports system, I read > >>the above section from the porters handbook and come to a show stopper. > >> > >>I can not figure out just what the aut

Re: [new port] usage of shar command

2010-07-18 Thread Joe
Matthew Seaman wrote: On 18/07/2010 10:56:42, Joe wrote: After getting my port ready for submitting to the ports system, I read the above section from the porters handbook and come to a show stopper. I can not figure out just what the author was trying to say with "output of shar `find port_di

Re: _PERL_REFACTORING_COMPLETE lang/perl5.12 Mk/bsd.perl.mk

2010-07-18 Thread Mark Linimon
The intention of bsd.perl.mk was to eventually allow a bunch of code to be pulled out of bsd.port.mk, and to have bsd.perl.mk only included conditionally, on the theory that it will speed up INDEX building somewhat. (I have not tested for speedup). The problem is that there are N ports that assum

_PERL_REFACTORING_COMPLETE lang/perl5.12 Mk/bsd.perl.mk

2010-07-18 Thread jhell
The following consumes a "lot" of the bsd.perl.mk file. Could this have any negative impact on ports that were previously using the areas that are contained in the if statements ?. net-snmp-5.* Installs cleanly and depends on libperl.so right after its installed (twice I might add) libnetsnm

Re: apache22 imap "ssl_onceonlyinit" error following latest upgrades -SOLVED

2010-07-18 Thread David Southwell
> Hi > > Apache22 no longer loading following upgrades. > > errors include: > > /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/lib/php/20090626/imap.so: Undefined symbol > "ssl_onceonlyinit" > > thanks in advance for any help > david > I recompiled mail/cclient and that fixed the problem. Although it worked

Re: Update "eiciel" port

2010-07-18 Thread Ruslan Mahmatkhanov
18.07.2010 23:09, Jerry пишет: The present version of "sysutils/eiciel" is over two years and two versions old. A newer version, Eiciel 0.9.8 has been released. The current version of eiciel does not work with nautilus. As soon as I right click on a folder in the nautilus window, the program cras

Re: Allow folloing 302 codes in FETCH_ARGS in bsd.port.mk

2010-07-18 Thread Ruslan Mahmatkhanov
18.07.2010 22:28, Baptiste Daroussin пишет: Hi, What about removing the -A option from FETCH_ARGS to allow fetch to follow 302 code. It causes trouble when using some authenticated proxies. It also causes troubles with github which is more and more used. Lots of projects on github doesn't provi

Update "eiciel" port

2010-07-18 Thread Jerry
The present version of "sysutils/eiciel" is over two years and two versions old. A newer version, Eiciel 0.9.8 has been released. The current version of eiciel does not work with nautilus. As soon as I right click on a folder in the nautilus window, the program crashes. This is on a FreeBSD 8.1-PRE

Allow folloing 302 codes in FETCH_ARGS in bsd.port.mk

2010-07-18 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
Hi, What about removing the -A option from FETCH_ARGS to allow fetch to follow 302 code. It causes trouble when using some authenticated proxies. It also causes troubles with github which is more and more used. Lots of projects on github doesn't provides distfiles, they rely on git tags automatic

Re: [new port] usage of shar command

2010-07-18 Thread Chip Camden
Quoth Anonymous on Sunday, 18 July 2010: > Johan van Selst writes: > > > Joe wrote: > >> I can not figure out just what the author was trying to say with > >> "output of shar `find port_dir`" > > > > If your port files are stored in the subdirectory 'newport' then > > you may issue the command >

apache22 imap "ssl_onceonlyinit" error following latest upgrades

2010-07-18 Thread David Southwell
Hi Apache22 no longer loading following upgrades. errors include: /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/lib/php/20090626/imap.so: Undefined symbol "ssl_onceonlyinit" thanks in advance for any help david Photographic Artist Permanent Installations & Design Creative Imagery and Advanced Digital Tec

Re: [new port] usage of shar command

2010-07-18 Thread Anonymous
Johan van Selst writes: > Joe wrote: >> I can not figure out just what the author was trying to say with >> "output of shar `find port_dir`" > > If your port files are stored in the subdirectory 'newport' then > you may issue the command > shar `find newport` > file.shar Another way is to

Re: [new port] usage of shar command

2010-07-18 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 18/07/2010 10:56:42, Joe wrote: > After getting my port ready for submitting to the ports system, I read > the above section from the porters handbook and come to a show stopper. > > I can not figure out just what the author was trying to say with > "output of shar `find port_dir`" > > Can so

Re: [new port] usage of shar command

2010-07-18 Thread Johan van Selst
Joe wrote: > I can not figure out just what the author was trying to say with > "output of shar `find port_dir`" If your port files are stored in the subdirectory 'newport' then you may issue the command shar `find newport` > file.shar This creates the 'file.shar' file, which contains a s

[new port] usage of shar command

2010-07-18 Thread Joe
3.6 Submitting the port Now that you are happy with your port, the only thing remaining is to put it in the main FreeBSD ports tree and make everybody else happy about it too. We do not need your work directory or the pkgname.tgz package, so delete them now. Next, simply include the output of

Re: Fakeroot for ports new round

2010-07-18 Thread Gary Jennejohn
On Sat, 17 Jul 2010 22:29:45 + Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > I also would like to get a clear statement on whether or should > continue working on this (ie is there a chance that this could be > accepted). > You should probably send a pointer to your PR and a request for review to port...@.

Re: www/linux-opera 10.60 patch...

2010-07-18 Thread Gary Jennejohn
On Sat, 17 Jul 2010 13:39:56 -0500 "Jeremy Messenger" wrote: > On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 02:46:11 -0500, Gary Jennejohn > wrote: > > I haven't noticed any problems with flash. > > No click issue? in Hulu? I only tested flash in hulu.com. > I just tried the trailer for Sorcerer's Apprentice and didn