Running FreeBSD 7.3-REL, while building glib-2.24.1 the post-install
part stalls, so the port never finishes installing. The offending
line is:
/usr/local/bin/gio-querymodules /usr/local/lib/gio/modules/
Running this manually produces the same result - gio-querymodules
stalls with no output.
___
On Tue, 11 May 2010, Alberto Villa wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 May 2010 03:37:01 Sahil Tandon wrote:
> > Regarding portlint's FATAL output, please review Package Naming
> > Conventions in the Handbook. Specifically, "If the software version has
> > strings like ``alpha'', ``beta'', ``rc'', or ``pre'',
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 8:23 PM, Adam Vande More wrote:
>> DISTVERSION= 3.0pre1
>> is shorter and cleaner
>>
>
> That's longer, and cleaner is debatable.
Well I've used DISTVERSION and it now reports 'looks fine.'
What is the next step?
--
Christer Edwards
__
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 9:08 PM, Alberto Villa wrote:
> > PORTVERSION= 3.0.p1
> > DISTNAME=${PORTNAME}-${PORTVERSION:S/.p/pre/}
>
> DISTVERSION=3.0pre1
> is shorter and cleaner
>
That's longer, and cleaner is debatable.
--
Adam Vande More
_
On Tuesday 11 May 2010 03:37:01 Sahil Tandon wrote:
> Regarding portlint's FATAL output, please review Package Naming
> Conventions in the Handbook. Specifically, "If the software version has
> strings like ``alpha'', ``beta'', ``rc'', or ``pre'', take the first
> letter and put it immediately afte
On 05/06/10 23:27, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
>
> Compared to the major Linux distros, you might want to keep one thing
> in mind: we are not backed-up by a commercial entity that pays for our
> work and for the hardware to do the work on. Indeed, I am not aware of
> any ports committer hired by someon
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 7:37 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> Regarding portlint's FATAL output, please review Package Naming
> Conventions in the Handbook. Specifically, "If the software version has
> strings like ``alpha'', ``beta'', ``rc'', or ``pre'', take the first
> letter and put it immediately af
On Mon, 10 May 2010, Christer Edwards wrote:
> but I'm running into complaints from portlint that I'm not sure how to
> address.
>
> I am eager to learn and I'm happy to dedicate the time to put this
> together, if someone doesn't mind offering advice on getting it to
> pass portlint's critical ey
As a disclaimer, I don't have much experience maintaining ports. I've
altered a few for my own personal use, but never delved too deeply
into the "official" details of it all.
I have been working with the upstream maintainer of ccache to solve an
issue related to ccache and buildworld on amd64. I
Forgive my ignorance and the long rambling email below.
I have limited knowledge of the intricacies of diff and the patching
process so I'm not sure exactly what you are asking for when you say
"Can you perhaps send me a port diff?".
Here is a full description of the process I went through to g
On 05/10/10 06:40, Denny Lin wrote:
> Hi, the path listed for shared libraries on the portmaster man page
> seems to be wrong. It should be /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg/ instead of
> /usr/local/compat/pkg.
Well that's embarrassing! (although not as embarrassing as if the 'rm
-r' example had it wrong)
On Mon, 10 May 2010, Robert Huff wrote:
Ted Hatfield writes:
spamass-milter-0.3.0_9 appears to be an update to fix the
security vulnerability referenced by CVE-2010-1132.
The current ported version appears to be 0.3.1_9?
Robert Huff
Hi Ted,
Thanks for pointing this out!
Can you perhaps send me a port diff? (will shorten the ETA)
Thanks,
Niels
On 05/10/10 21:07, Ted Hatfield wrote:
>
> spamass-milter-0.3.0_9 appears to be an update to fix the security
> vulnerability referenced by CVE-2010-1132.
>
> However the patch insta
Ted Hatfield writes:
> spamass-milter-0.3.0_9 appears to be an update to fix the
> security vulnerability referenced by CVE-2010-1132.
The current ported version appears to be 0.3.1_9?
Robert Huff
___
spamass-milter-0.3.0_9 appears to be an update to fix the security
vulnerability referenced by CVE-2010-1132.
However the patch installed for this vulnerability fails to close
processes properly and spamass-milter leaves a large number of zombie
processes open until the milter is restarted.
Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 10/05/2010 17:12:47, Helmut Schneider wrote:
>
> > Is there a list of ports-related knobs for make.conf?
>
> Other than /usr/ports/KNOBS you mean?
No. :)
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/m
On 10-05-2010 19:34, O. Hartmann wrote:
> Since the X11-update from libraries and applications 1.4 -> 1.5 the
> xterminal keyboard beeping, disabled by 'xset -b' or 'xset b off'
> doesn't work. In xterm, I get beeping although I disabled beeping via
> the above mentioned xset command.
"Me too".
Since the X11-update from libraries and applications 1.4 -> 1.5 the
xterminal keyboard beeping, disabled by 'xset -b' or 'xset b off'
doesn't work. In xterm, I get beeping although I disabled beeping via
the above mentioned xset command.
Regards,
Oliver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/05/2010 17:12:47, Helmut Schneider wrote:
> Is there a list of ports-related knobs for make.conf?
Other than /usr/ports/KNOBS you mean?
As far as I know, no one has managed to assemble a document detailing
all of the various variables that can
Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 10/05/2010 24:30:19, Celso Viana wrote:
>
> > I already have Apache 2.0.x installed on a machine, but the
> > "dansguardian" has dependency on apache 1.3.x, how do I run
> > dansguardian with apache 2.0.x?
>
> Put:
>
> APACHE_PORT=www/apache20
>
> into /etc/make.conf
Hi, the path listed for shared libraries on the portmaster man page
seems to be wrong. It should be /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg/ instead of
/usr/local/compat/pkg.
--
Denny Lin
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/lis
(Note: an HTML version of this report is available at
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?category=ports .)
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including
experimental development code and obsol
Funny enough, I cannot contribute to this thread anymore, as it appears that
only a fraction of the messages in this thread ended in my mail box. I
understand this is a deliberate and convenient policy!
Tim
__
23 matches
Mail list logo
