Re: ports-mgmt/portmaster distfile expression matching

2010-01-15 Thread Doug Barton
On 1/15/2010 6:32 PM, jhell wrote: > > Hi Doug, > > Recently in upgrading x11-wm/xmonad and x11-wm/xmonad-contrib I had > noticed that when portmaster asks to delete a distfile, when it asks > about xmonad-0.9.1 it was also asking to delete the xmonad-contrib-0.9.1 > before it had even upgraded x

Re: ports-mgmt/portmaster distfile expression matching

2010-01-15 Thread jhell
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 22:23, wxs@ wrote: On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 09:32:32PM -0500, jhell wrote: Hi Doug, Recently in upgrading x11-wm/xmonad and x11-wm/xmonad-contrib I had noticed that when portmaster asks to delete a distfile, when it asks about xmonad-0.9.1 it was also asking to delete the x

Re: rdiff-backup-1.2.8 python2.5.4 : OverflowError: signed integer is greater than maximum

2010-01-15 Thread Michel Le Cocq
I upgrade to python26 by following the 20090608 entry in /usr/ports/UPDATING. I'm now on : python26-2.6.4, rdiff-backup-1.2.8,1 But I still have the same error : OverflowError: signed integer is greater than ma

ports-mgmt/portmaster distfile expression matching

2010-01-15 Thread jhell
Hi Doug, Recently in upgrading x11-wm/xmonad and x11-wm/xmonad-contrib I had noticed that when portmaster asks to delete a distfile, when it asks about xmonad-0.9.1 it was also asking to delete the xmonad-contrib-0.9.1 before it had even upgraded xmonad-contrib. Is this a problem on portmaste

Re: ports-mgmt/portmaster distfile expression matching

2010-01-15 Thread Wesley Shields
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 09:32:32PM -0500, jhell wrote: > > Hi Doug, > > Recently in upgrading x11-wm/xmonad and x11-wm/xmonad-contrib I had > noticed that when portmaster asks to delete a distfile, when it asks about > xmonad-0.9.1 it was also asking to delete the xmonad-contrib-0.9.1 before >

Re: 8-STABLE: gmirror segfaulting

2010-01-15 Thread Alexander Motin
Oliver Lehmann wrote: > Hi, > > sorry for the long story following but I think this is important to get > the picture ;) > > > I had the following setup: > > 2 harddisks ada0, ada1 mirrored with gmirror as gm0 > 1 2.7TB twa-RAID as da0 > > the da0p1 partition had a gjournal on gm0s1fh > the gm

Re: sysutils/xfce4-netload-plugin - why is it marked as broken on 8?

2010-01-15 Thread Greg Larkin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 1:14 AM, RW wrote: > >> On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 19:04:29 -0500 >> Greg Larkin wrote: >> >> >>> The CVS commit in question says that the breakage was reported by >>> pointyhat (FreeBSD package b

Re: 8-STABLE: gmirror segfaulting

2010-01-15 Thread Oliver Lehmann
Oliver Lehmann wrote: > [some stuff] I picked the wrong list, sorry for the noise... -- Oliver Lehmann http://www.pofo.de/ http://wishlist.ans-netz.de/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-p

8-STABLE: gmirror segfaulting

2010-01-15 Thread Oliver Lehmann
Hi, sorry for the long story following but I think this is important to get the picture ;) I had the following setup: 2 harddisks ada0, ada1 mirrored with gmirror as gm0 1 2.7TB twa-RAID as da0 the da0p1 partition had a gjournal on gm0s1fh the gm0s1f partition had a gjournal on gm0s1fg I trie

Re: sysutils/xfce4-netload-plugin - why is it marked as broken on 8?

2010-01-15 Thread Torfinn Ingolfsen
Hi, On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 1:14 AM, RW wrote: > On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 19:04:29 -0500 > Greg Larkin wrote: > > > > The CVS commit in question says that the breakage was reported by > > pointyhat (FreeBSD package building cluster): > > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/sysutils/xfce4-n

authentication with hardware device identification??

2010-01-15 Thread David Southwell
Hi I want to be able to permit ssh access to servers over the internet in a way that limits that access to specific hardware (i.e. laptops with known hardware configurations and devices). So I am looking for some additional layer of security on top of the normal private key & certificate system

rdiff-backup-1.2.8 python2.5.4 : OverflowError: signed integer is greater than maximum

2010-01-15 Thread Michel Le Cocq
I run rdiff-backup on my backup server: - FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE AMD64 - rdiff-backup-1.2.8,1 - python25-2.5.4_3 - be pro quad - 4G Ram I try to rdiff a folder on a nfs ro mounted volume to an other volume. I obtain this error : OverflowError: signed integer is greater than maximum I have the same

Re: utmpx fallout - fix for mrxvt-devel

2010-01-15 Thread Lars Engels
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:43:18PM +0100, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > Here's an (inlined) patch to fix mrxvt-devel after the move to utmpx. > > The maintainer (lme@) copied per Cc. > > --- Makefile.orig 2010-01-15 12:23:35.0 +0100 > +++ Makefile 2010-01-15 12:27:54.0 +0100 > @@ -

mDNSResponder

2010-01-15 Thread Andrea Venturoli
This is on FreeBSD 6.3/i386: ---> Upgrading 'mDNSResponder-108' to 'mDNSResponder-214' (net/mDNSResponder) ---> Building '/usr/ports/net/mDNSResponder' ===> Cleaning for mDNSResponder-214 ===> Extracting for mDNSResponder-214 => MD5 Checksum OK for mDNSResponder-214.tar.gz. => SHA256 Checks

utmpx fallout - fix for mrxvt-devel

2010-01-15 Thread Gary Jennejohn
Here's an (inlined) patch to fix mrxvt-devel after the move to utmpx. The maintainer (lme@) copied per Cc. --- Makefile.orig 2010-01-15 12:23:35.0 +0100 +++ Makefile2010-01-15 12:27:54.0 +0100 @@ -37,6 +37,10 @@ .include +.if ${OSVERSION} >= 97 +CONFIGURE_ARGS+