Re: Need help disabling (re-)configure step

2009-12-29 Thread Eygene Ryabinkin
Ronald, good day. Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 07:33:32PM -0800, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > So anyway, I've found that if I just take the ./configure command as > it appears in the config.log file, and edit it to remove this option: > >--with-dbus-system-socket=unix:path=/var/run/dbus/system_bus_so

Need help disabling (re-)configure step

2009-12-29 Thread Ronald F. Guilmette
I've been trying for some time to ge graphics/gthumb installed on my 7.0-RELEASE system and it just ain't workin' and it's becoming _very_ frustrating. Basically, gthumb requires avahi-app, which (for as yet unexplained reasons) won't even properly go through the configure step on my system. (Se

boost 1.41 and net-p2p/deluge

2009-12-29 Thread Michal Varga
After the recent boost upgrade to 1.41, net-p2p/deluge needs to be recompiled to actually start, otherwise one just gets a nice crash/deadlock (I didn't investigate as I already remember the exactly same issue with previous boost upgrade, so went directly for recompilation). Anyway, just an idea -

Re: mplayer from SVN

2009-12-29 Thread Sean C. Farley
On Tue, 29 Dec 2009, Michal Varga wrote: On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 9:03 PM, Sean C. Farley wrote: I am jumping randomly into the thread. If we want to use some type of "release" for MPlayer based upon a snapshot from svn, how about using the same snapshot as used in Fedora (actually RPM Fusio

Re: mplayer from SVN

2009-12-29 Thread Michal Varga
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 9:03 PM, Sean C. Farley wrote: > I am jumping randomly into the thread. > > If we want to use some type of "release" for MPlayer based upon a snapshot > from svn, how about using the same snapshot as used in Fedora (actually RPM > Fusion)[1]?  It has the advantages of alrea

Re: mplayer from SVN

2009-12-29 Thread Sean C. Farley
I am jumping randomly into the thread. If we want to use some type of "release" for MPlayer based upon a snapshot from svn, how about using the same snapshot as used in Fedora (actually RPM Fusion)[1]? It has the advantages of already being created, tested(?) and easier to track bugs that use

Re: mplayer from SVN

2009-12-29 Thread Lars Engels
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 08:03:21PM +0100, Michal Varga wrote: > On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 7:05 PM, Frank Staals wrote: > > On 12/29/09 14:31, Lars Engels wrote: > >> > >> Quoting Frank Staals : > >> > >>> I know it is not as nice as simply having a port. But if you realy need > >>> the svn-releases

Re: mailman web access to archives failure:

2009-12-29 Thread Greg Larkin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 David Southwell wrote: [...] >> Hi David, >> >> This directory has a problem if mailman runs its scripts with uid/gid of >> www/www: >> >> drwxrws--- 10 mailman mailman 512 Dec 28 15:45 >> /usr/local/mailman/archives/private >> >> "Other" users (inc

Re: mplayer from SVN

2009-12-29 Thread Michal Varga
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 7:05 PM, Frank Staals wrote: > On 12/29/09 14:31, Lars Engels wrote: >> >> Quoting Frank Staals : >> >>> I know it is not as nice as simply having a port. But if you realy need >>> the svn-releases for some feature XYZ it may be a (temporary) solution. >> >> >> Are there an

Re: mailman web access to archives failure:

2009-12-29 Thread David Southwell
> David Southwell wrote: > >> David Southwell wrote: > David Southwell wrote: > [...] > > > Thank you Boris > > > > After reading your files I changed the httpd.conf to follow your > > format but it still did not work :-(. > > > > Here are my entries: > >

Re: mailman web access to archives failure:

2009-12-29 Thread Greg Larkin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 David Southwell wrote: >> David Southwell wrote: David Southwell wrote: [...] > Thank you Boris > > After reading your files I changed the httpd.conf to follow your format > but it still did not work :-(. > > Here

Re: mailman web access to archives failure:

2009-12-29 Thread David Southwell
> David Southwell wrote: > >> David Southwell wrote: > David Southwell wrote: > > Boris Kochergin helpfully said: > >> David Southwell wrote: > >>> Thank you in advance for replies. The list is now working fine > >>> however: From: > >>> http://www.vizion2000.net/mailman/l

Re: mailman web access to archives failure:

2009-12-29 Thread David Southwell
> David Southwell wrote: > >> David Southwell wrote: > >> [...] > >> > >>> Thank you Boris > >>> > >>> After reading your files I changed the httpd.conf to follow your format > >>> but it still did not work :-(. > >>> > >>> Here are my entries: > >>> > >>> > >>> # This should be changed to whatever

Re: mailman web access to archives failure:

2009-12-29 Thread Greg Larkin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 David Southwell wrote: >> David Southwell wrote: David Southwell wrote: > Boris Kochergin helpfully said: >> David Southwell wrote: >>> Thank you in advance for replies. The list is now working fine >>> however: From: >>> http

Re: mailman web access to archives failure:

2009-12-29 Thread Greg Larkin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 David Southwell wrote: >> David Southwell wrote: >> [...] >> >>> Thank you Boris >>> >>> After reading your files I changed the httpd.conf to follow your format >>> but it still did not work :-(. >>> >>> Here are my entries: >>> >>> >>> # This should b

Re: mailman web access to archives failure:

2009-12-29 Thread David Southwell
> David Southwell wrote: > >> David Southwell wrote: > >>> Boris Kochergin helpfully said: > David Southwell wrote: > > Thank you in advance for replies. The list is now working fine > > however: From: > > http://www.vizion2000.net/mailman/listinfo/bps_comps_print_announce > >

Re: mailman web access to archives failure:

2009-12-29 Thread Boris Kochergin
David Southwell wrote: David Southwell wrote: Boris Kochergin helpfully said: David Southwell wrote: Thank you in advance for replies. The list is now working fine however: From: http://www.vizion2000.net/mailman/listinfo/bps_comps_print_announce On line: To see collecti

Re: mplayer from SVN

2009-12-29 Thread Frank Staals
On 12/29/09 14:31, Lars Engels wrote: Quoting Frank Staals : I know it is not as nice as simply having a port. But if you realy need the svn-releases for some feature XYZ it may be a (temporary) solution. Are there any killer features missing in our old version from ports? I don't really kno

Re: mailman web access to archives failure:

2009-12-29 Thread David Southwell
> David Southwell wrote: > [...] > > > Thank you Boris > > > > After reading your files I changed the httpd.conf to follow your format > > but it still did not work :-(. > > > > Here are my entries: > > > > > > # This should be changed to whatever you set DocumentRoot to. > > # > > > > # > >

Re: mailman web access to archives failure:

2009-12-29 Thread Greg Larkin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 David Southwell wrote: [...] > Thank you Boris > > After reading your files I changed the httpd.conf to follow your format but > it > still did not work :-(. > > Here are my entries: > > > # This should be changed to whatever you set DocumentRoot

Re: mailman web access to archives failure:

2009-12-29 Thread David Southwell
> David Southwell wrote: > > Boris Kochergin helpfully said: > >> David Southwell wrote: > >>> Thank you in advance for replies. The list is now working fine however: > >>> From: > >>> http://www.vizion2000.net/mailman/listinfo/bps_comps_print_announce > >>> > >>> On line: > >>> To see collection

Re: mailman web access to archives failure:

2009-12-29 Thread Boris Kochergin
David Southwell wrote: Boris Kochergin helpfully said: David Southwell wrote: Thank you in advance for replies. The list is now working fine however: From: http://www.vizion2000.net/mailman/listinfo/bps_comps_print_announce On line: To see collection of prior postings to the list, vis

Re: (no subject)

2009-12-29 Thread Eygene Ryabinkin
Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 02:50:25PM +0300, Yuri Pankov wrote: > Thanks for explanation. Welcome ;)) > I just wonder how PREFIX is different from > LOCALBASE (i.e., devel/gettext uses .if exists(${PREFIX}/.) without > including bsd.port.pre.mk). It is no different. Using PREFIX without bsd.port.

Re: mailman web access to archives failure:

2009-12-29 Thread David Southwell
Boris Kochergin helpfully said: > David Southwell wrote: > > Thank you in advance for replies. The list is now working fine however: > > From: > > http://www.vizion2000.net/mailman/listinfo/bps_comps_print_announce > > > > On line: > > To see collection of prior postings to the list, visit the > >

Re: mailman web access to archives failure:

2009-12-29 Thread Boris Kochergin
The two Alias lines I have in my working installation are: ScriptAlias /mailman "/usr/local/mailman/cgi-bin" Alias /pipermail "/usr/local/mailman/archives/public" -Boris David Southwell wrote: Thank you in advance for replies. The list is now working fine however: From: http://www.vizion2000

mailman web access to archives failure:

2009-12-29 Thread David Southwell
Thank you in advance for replies. The list is now working fine however: From: http://www.vizion2000.net/mailman/listinfo/bps_comps_print_announce On line: To see collection of prior postings to the list, visit the clicking link for> bps_comps_print_announce Archives goes to: http://www.vizion2

Re: mplayer from SVN

2009-12-29 Thread Lars Engels
Quoting Frank Staals : On 12/28/09 15:47, eculp wrote: On Fri, 11 Dec 2009, Denis Shaposhnikov wrote: Hello, Does anybody have a port for building mplayer from SVN? Thanks! On a sidenote: I used to build mplayer from svn regularly on my previous system. Updating mplayer usually was quite p

Re: mplayer from SVN

2009-12-29 Thread Stefan Ehmann
On Monday 28 December 2009 19:06:51 Frank Staals wrote: > On 12/28/09 15:47, eculp wrote: > >>> On Fri, 11 Dec 2009, Denis Shaposhnikov wrote: > Hello, > > Does anybody have a port for building mplayer from SVN? > > Thanks! > > On a sidenote: I used to build mplayer from s

INDEX failing on 6.3/i386

2009-12-29 Thread Andrea Venturoli
Hello. Am I the only one who's not able to build INDEX on the above version? I didn't see anything on the list WRT to this topic. What I get is: mod_webapp-4.1.24_3: "/usr/ports/www/apache1.3.6" non-existent -- dependency list incomplete I can build INDEX if I completely remove www/mod_webapp

Re: Call for tester: VirtualBox 3.1.2 for FreeBSD

2009-12-29 Thread David Southwell
> Beat Gaetzi wrote: > > Philipp Wuensche wrote: > >> Martin Wilke wrote: > >>> Please report any functionality which was working with previous > >>> versions of VirtualBox and no longer working with 3.1.2 or any build > >>> failure. > >> > >> Seem like the fix from > >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/

Re: (no subject)

2009-12-29 Thread Yuri Pankov
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 02:17:17PM +0300, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: > Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 10:40:02AM +0300, Yuri Pankov wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 01:28:46AM -0600, Scot Hetzel wrote: > > > dv8t01# make do-check > > > File /usr/local/etc/rc.d/motd exists > > > File /usr/local/etc/rc.d/hald d

Re: (no subject)

2009-12-29 Thread Eygene Ryabinkin
Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 10:40:02AM +0300, Yuri Pankov wrote: > On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 01:28:46AM -0600, Scot Hetzel wrote: > > dv8t01# make do-check > > File /usr/local/etc/rc.d/motd exists > > File /usr/local/etc/rc.d/hald doesnt exist > > > > This Makefile fails due to LOCALBASE is not defined at

Re: Mailman - group mismatch error

2009-12-29 Thread David Southwell
> > On Dec 28, 2009, at 3:57 AM, David Southwell wrote: > > > The entry in maillog does not say how to tweak postfix! > > > > Be sure to install mailman from ports and set the make options for > > postfix. > > > > cd /usr/ports/mail/mailman > > sudo make config > > > > and choose the postfix opti

Re: Mailman - group mismatch error

2009-12-29 Thread David Southwell
> On Dec 28, 2009, at 3:57 AM, David Southwell wrote: > > The entry in maillog does not say how to tweak postfix! > > Be sure to install mailman from ports and set the make options for postfix. > > cd /usr/ports/mail/mailman > sudo make config > > and choose the postfix option. > > Cheers, >

Re: Strange behavior of 'exists' function. Need help with Makefile.

2009-12-29 Thread Yevgen Krapiva
Thanks to all, Scot Hetzel have found the reason, I had to add the following line before target definitions: .include And yes, tomcat6 Makefile also had this line but I've missed it :( On Tue, 2009-12-29 at 09:56 +0200, Yevgen Krapiva wrote: > Thanks Ulrich, > > I've discovered the following

Re: (no subject)

2009-12-29 Thread Yuri Pankov
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 01:28:46AM -0600, Scot Hetzel wrote: > On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 3:22 AM, Yevgen Krapiva wrote: > > Hi guys, > > > > I'm trying to create my own port. I'm stucked with the following > > Makefile: > > > > PORTNAME= openjsip > > PORTVERSION= 0.0.4 > > ... > > ... > > MY_