Dear Sir,
I found the following ports in FreeBSD was maintained by you.
/usr/ports/security/nikto
In 10/062007, the nikto has released Ver 2.1.0
In this new release, it has many bugs fixed and new features.
Could you please update the nikto in FreeBSD port
tree to version Ver 2
The new addition to Makefile on /lib/libthr "-Wl,-znodlopen "
Breaks php4 and mhash on my current 1386
I'm sure other ports that use it are broken too as can't load the lib.
Remove -Wl,-znodlopen and everything works again.
Manfred
==
|| n...@pozo.com
With the impending public release of 8.0-RELEASE, we decided to lift the
soft freeze that was in effect on the Ports Collection in past weeks.
The ports tree is now fully open to commits.
--
Pav Lucistnik
The Linimon's Rule: The More You Close, The More Will Come
signature.asc
Max Baker wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a maintainer for net-mgmt/netdisco? We just released 1.0 which
> has 3+ years of improvements and bug fixes, and it would be great to
> have the FreeBSD port updated. Note that net-mgmt/p5-SNMP-Info is half
> of Netdisco and appears to have been updated recent
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 11:15:50AM -0800, Max Baker wrote:
> Is there a maintainer for net-mgmt/netdisco?
nope, it's listed as "po...@freebsd.org" which is the place-holder
address (signifies "unmaintained"). So, it's ready for adoption :-)
mcl
___
fre
Hi,
Is there a maintainer for net-mgmt/netdisco? We just released 1.0 which
has 3+ years of improvements and bug fixes, and it would be great to
have the FreeBSD port updated. Note that net-mgmt/p5-SNMP-Info is half
of Netdisco and appears to have been updated recently by jadawin.
Thanks
Folks,
I'd like to share the current status of devel/boost-* ports.
In brief, the patch for updating is ready, many ports build successfully,
but there are two failures caused by the update. One of them is severe and
hard to fix. The boost team is informed.
More information, the patch, build log
Foks,
The current status of the issue is as follows:
*) I've contacted a boost team, they suggested a smaller patch
*) I've applied a patch, this allows code to build, but one the tests for
the patched code (in "libs/smart_ptr/test") fail. This is not one of the
tests that were expected to fail
On Nov 26, 2009, at 2:35 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> kazehakase-0.5.4_6, FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT ia64
>
> I'm not really sure what to look for in debugger:
You want to to recompile at a lower optimization level and with
debugging enabled (i.e. -O0 -g). If you can't reproduce the
problem this wa
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 18:10, Michael W. Lucas
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there an approved/offical way to compile a port with debugging
> symbols?
>
> Habitually I've just run "make configure" and then edited Makefiles.
> But I'm sure that's not what you folks recommend users do...
IIRC, the
WITH_DE
On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 18:01 +0100, Rene Ladan wrote:
> 2009/11/26 Michael W. Lucas :
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is there an approved/offical way to compile a port with debugging
> > symbols?
> >
> > Habitually I've just run "make configure" and then edited Makefiles.
> > But I'm sure that's not what you folks
On Thu, 26 Nov 2009, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
Is there an approved/offical way to compile a port with debugging
symbols?
Habitually I've just run "make configure" and then edited Makefiles.
But I'm sure that's not what you folks recommend users do...
make -DWITH_DEBUG, according to bsd.ports.m
2009/11/26 Michael W. Lucas :
> Hi,
>
> Is there an approved/offical way to compile a port with debugging
> symbols?
>
> Habitually I've just run "make configure" and then edited Makefiles.
> But I'm sure that's not what you folks recommend users do...
>
Just adding -g to CFLAGS in /etc/make.conf s
Hi,
Is there an approved/offical way to compile a port with debugging
symbols?
Habitually I've just run "make configure" and then edited Makefiles.
But I'm sure that's not what you folks recommend users do...
Thanks,
==ml
--
Michael W. Lucasmwlu...@blackhelicopters.org
http://www.Micha
* Aldis Berjoza [26.11.2009. @10:12:53 +0200]:
> Hello!
>
> I'm creating OpenOffice 3.1.1 packages for FreeBSD-8-RELEASE, for i686
> cpu.
> CPUTYPE?=i686
>
> In few hours my work will be finished. I've found site that would host
> these packages [Linux Center of Latvia Univercity], but they wan
Quoting Gary Kline :
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 04:39:19AM -0600, Scot Hetzel wrote:
On 11/26/09, Gary Kline wrote:
> > Looks like all the OpenOffice ports have a line like this:
> > JAVA_VENDOR=freebsd bsdjava openjdk
>
>
>
> Okay, so what does this mean I'm going to have to
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 04:39:19AM -0600, Scot Hetzel wrote:
> On 11/26/09, Gary Kline wrote:
> > > Looks like all the OpenOffice ports have a line like this:
> > > JAVA_VENDOR=freebsd bsdjava openjdk
> >
> >
> >
> > Okay, so what does this mean I'm going to have to find and
>
Hi Daisuke Aoyama and list
I'm trying run iSCSI target on my -CURRENT box
%uname -a
FreeBSD current.domain 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #6
r198480: Tue Nov 3 10:03:09 EET 2009
r...@current.domain:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/KERN amd64
%pkg_info -xI istgt
istgt-20090428 An iSCSI target for Fr
On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:50:35 +0200, Balogh Szabolcs wrote:
> It is possible to spli Quassel-IRC into:
> - quassel-core (maybe a statically linked version, which doesn't
> require QT)
building quassel-core still requires non-gui Qt libraries, you have to install
Qt anyway.
> - quassel-client
>
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 10:35:51AM +, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> kazehakase-0.5.4_6, FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT ia64
>
> I'm not really sure what to look for in debugger:
>
> GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD]
> Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General P
On 11/26/09, Gary Kline wrote:
> > Looks like all the OpenOffice ports have a line like this:
> > JAVA_VENDOR=freebsd bsdjava openjdk
>
>
>
> Okay, so what does this mean I'm going to have to find and
> build from java-land from Sun? Anything??
>
>
It defines which jav
kazehakase-0.5.4_6, FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT ia64
I'm not really sure what to look for in debugger:
GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD]
Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it und
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 09:57:50AM +0100, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:04:01 -0800
> Gary Kline wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 02:25:59PM +0100, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> > >
> > > If it depended on OpenJDK by default it wouldn't be a problem. I do not
> > > know whether i
On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:04:01 -0800
Gary Kline wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 02:25:59PM +0100, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> > Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> > > On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 05:01:19 -0600
> > > Mark Linimon wrote:
> > >
> > >> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 09:05:46PM +0200, Aldis Berjoza wrote:
> > >>
Hello!
I'm creating OpenOffice 3.1.1 packages for FreeBSD-8-RELEASE, for i686
cpu.
CPUTYPE?=i686
In few hours my work will be finished. I've found site that would host
these packages [Linux Center of Latvia Univercity], but they want some
FreeBSD developer to verify quality of my builds, before t
25 matches
Mail list logo
