On Sat, 23 May 2009, David N wrote:
> I'm currently very interested in Zimbra, but unfortunately the
> developers decided on a "Fat Package" approach so everything is
> bundled directly into the source. It also has its path hard coded into
> /opt/zimbra.
>
> If someone manages to create a patch f
Hi,
I'm currently very interested in Zimbra, but unfortunately the
developers decided on a "Fat Package" approach so everything is
bundled directly into the source. It also has its path hard coded into
/opt/zimbra.
If someone manages to create a patch for it to be compiled and running
successfull
On Fri, 22 May 2009 16:30:19 -0400
"Philip M. Gollucci" wrote:
> Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> > I can run a few test builds on QAT and maybe Phillip can do the
> > same on his tindy. Just drop us the patch ;-)
> > Even if it only works with MAXJOB = 2, we mark it as such and the
> > build will be fas
Uwe Laverenz wrote:
Panagiotis Christias schrieb:
I am already using that. Without it portinstall/upgrade would try
every time to install net/openldap24-client (and fail). But it still
does not register the dependency.
There is a "knob" for this problem that should help you, please add
Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> I can run a few test builds on QAT and maybe Phillip can do the same on
> his tindy. Just drop us the patch ;-)
> Even if it only works with MAXJOB = 2, we mark it as such and the build
> will be faster.
LOL. Do it once and I get volunteered.
Too funny. Sure I'm up for som
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 10:24:10PM +0200, Gustau Pérez wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > rm -rf /tmp/.vbox-* doesen't help ?
> >
>
>Nope. Vbox recreates the directory /tmp/.vbox-root-ipc. Nothing in
> /var/log/messages. Do you want an screenshot of it ?
Recr
>
>
> rm -rf /tmp/.vbox-* doesen't help ?
>
Nope. Vbox recreates the directory /tmp/.vbox-root-ipc. Nothing in
/var/log/messages. Do you want an screenshot of it ?
Regards,
Gus
--
PGP KEY : http://www-entel.upc.edu/gus/gus.asc
___
freebsd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 09:53:08PM +0200, Gustau Pérez wrote:
>
> >
> > We rolled a new version with a fix for all users where has problems
> > with kernel load and unload. Many thanks to Shin-ichi Okano where
> > submitted this patch to the vbox ml.
>
> We rolled a new version with a fix for all users where has problems
> with kernel load and unload. Many thanks to Shin-ichi Okano where
> submitted this patch to the vbox ml.
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~miwi/vbox/virtualbox_4.tgz
>
> happy testing.
>
>
Hi everyone,
I'm using i386/CUR
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
We rolled a new version with a fix for all users where
has problems with kernel load and unload. Many thanks to
Shin-ichi Okano where submitted this patch to the vbox ml.
http://people.freebsd.org/~miwi/vbox/virtualbox_4.tgz
happy testing.
- - Mar
Hi all,
I've started noticing more and more that packages I build are missing files
after they are rebuilt. I've tested this time and time again, and seem to
be able to show that about 10 ports (gettext, apache, net-snmp, some php
modules, etc.) are built correctly the first time, but when la
Hi,
I saw that the port www/p5-libapreq2 was updated between May 16th and 17th
(2009).
Trying to upgrade the port, I get the following error:
Writing Makefile for libapreq2
cd perl; gmake
gmake[2]: Entering directory
`/var/ports/basejail/usr/ports/www/p5-libapreq2/work/libapreq2-2.12/glue/perl'
* Pav Lucistnik (p...@freebsd.org) wrote:
> we finally decided that enough users migrated to recent enough FreeBSD
> versions that we can finally suggest that maintainers can start using
> file in their ports.
>
> The examples in Porter's Handbook had been updated to illustrate a new
> usage.
>
On Fri, 22 May 2009 19:53:50 +0900 (JST)
Maho NAKATA wrote:
> In massive parallel build, OOo can be broken. We explicitly
> fix them otherwise broken. I just test with MAXJOB = 4 or something
> like that.
>
> > I had it complain about perl (or
> > something) needing to be recompiled but that w
Boris Samorodov wrote:
On Fri, 22 May 2009 06:08:58 +0300 Panagiotis Christias wrote:
Ok, then how about dropping the net/openldap24-sasl-client port and
adding an SASL OPTIONS entry to the net/openldap24-client port, like
the server port?
Then those who use packages will loose a possibility
Dear,
we finally decided that enough users migrated to recent enough FreeBSD
versions that we can finally suggest that maintainers can start using
file in their ports.
The examples in Porter's Handbook had been updated to illustrate a new
usage.
This will solve the problem with USE_* flags peop
On Fri, 22 May 2009 06:08:58 +0300 Panagiotis Christias wrote:
> Ok, then how about dropping the net/openldap24-sasl-client port and
> adding an SASL OPTIONS entry to the net/openldap24-client port, like
> the server port?
Then those who use packages will loose a possibility to use
"pkg_add -r".
Hi David,
From: David Naylor
Subject: Re: MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE (some more ports)
Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 12:24:30 +0200
> On Friday 22 May 2009 07:11:19 Maho NAKATA wrote:
>> Dear,
>>
>> I appriciate David or Ion-Mihai make a patch for that.
>> just seetting MAXMODULE=4 and/or MAXPROCESSES=4 or somet
On Friday 22 May 2009 07:11:19 Maho NAKATA wrote:
> Dear,
>
> I appriciate David or Ion-Mihai make a patch for that.
> just seetting MAXMODULE=4 and/or MAXPROCESSES=4 or something like that.
>
> But note that sometimes it's broken :-( by missing dependencey.
What do you mean by missing dependency?
Philip M. Gollucci píše v čt 21. 05. 2009 v 22:34 -0400:
> > +20090521:
> > +AUTHOR: port...@freebsd.org
> > +
> > + * bsd.port.options.mk is now clear to be widely used.
> > +
>
> Are there any existing examples of how one should use this or porters
> handbook sections ?
There is an example in
20 matches
Mail list logo
